User talk:Pablito1977

December 2016

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia moronically, as you did at Michael Reagan, this IP will be blocked from editing privileges. Quis separabit? 01:05, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for contravening Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 01:11, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

April 2017

Hello, I'm MrOllie. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 01:10, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I provided proper sources and the information is relevant to the subject. Peer to peer rental is an interesting subject and I am tracking the leaders of that industry. Will be adding more. If you want, edit the text but do not delete it. Not fair for someone that is working hard to contribute. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pablito1977 (talk • contribs)

Thanks for your work, but we can't promote particular companies on Wikipedia. Write about the industry in general instead of companies in particular and you should be fine. - 75.136.67.37 (talk) 15:33, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

But, there are millions of companies on Wikipedia. How is that possible then?

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rentus’ (April 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft also has notability issues because there are too few independent references.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rentus’ and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 05:04, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Pablito1977, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 05:04, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Sillicon Beach

A tag has been placed on Category:Sillicon Beach requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and it is not presently under discussion at Categories for discussion, or at disambiguation categories.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —swpb^T 20:09, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]