User talk:Parekh apurva cricketer
Parekh apurva cricketer, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]
|
Hi Parekh apurva cricketer! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:04, 17 December 2018 (UTC) |
December 2018
[edit]
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Sunrisers Hyderabad. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 15:41, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
Category:IPL
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Sunrisers Hyderabad, you may be blocked from editing. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 15:40, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Parekh apurva cricketer. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, Draft:Parekh apurva.
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89 (T·C) 03:03, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
January 2020
[edit]
Please stop adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did on Mumbai Indians. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. David Biddulph (talk) 05:58, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of User:Parekh apurva cricketer
[edit]
A tag has been placed on User:Parekh apurva cricketer requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. David Biddulph (talk) 06:13, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of User:Parekh apurva cricketer
[edit]Please do not introduce inappropriate pages, such as User:Parekh apurva cricketer, to Wikipedia. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.
Blatant hoax - references refer to a different cricketer, though in at least one case (ref 4) the title given in the ref was falsified David Biddulph (talk) 06:13, 18 January 2020 (UTC)