User talk:Phuc180802

February 2022[edit]

Please refrain from changing genres, as you did to My Beautiful Dark Twisted Fantasy, without providing a source or establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to sult your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 04:28, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022[edit]

Hello, I'm Ampimd. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Hatem Ben Arfa have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Ampimd (talk) 05:29, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Travis Scott, you may be blocked from editing. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:03, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy, as you did with this edit to Travis Scott. lavender|^{(formerly HMSSolent)}|lambast 04:16, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at My Beautiful Dark Twisted Fantasy. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 15:04, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at My Beautiful Dark Twisted Fantasy, you may be blocked from editing. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 07:00, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at My Beautiful Dark Twisted Fantasy. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 14:16, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 15:36, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022[edit]

Hello! I'm Lord Belbury. Your recent edit(s) to the page United Kingdom appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been reverted for now. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Lord Belbury (talk) 09:11, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 2022[edit]

Hello, I'm Knitsey. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to D'Angelo seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Knitsey (talk) 14:47, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Taiwan. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox. Do not alter direct quotations from books. Belbury (talk) 16:16, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Taiwan. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Belbury (talk) 16:55, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Phil Foden, you may be blocked from editing. Mattythewhite (talk) 16:12, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Phil Foden. Mattythewhite (talk) 16:44, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikilinking commonly used English words[edit]

Avoid Wikilinking commonly used English words like "south". The links usually lead to disambiguation articles where there are multiple meanings, but in general it is pointless because even early English learners will know what the word means, making the linking pointless. Yue🌙 22:46, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 6[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Futsal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Indoor football. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Adding incorrect information[edit]

Hello! I'm Canterbury Tail. Your recent edit(s) to the page Xenia Deli appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been reverted for now. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Canterbury Tail talk 21:41, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Same at Illinois (Sufjan Stevens album). Stop putting lies in Wikipedia. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 10:33, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

South Korea[edit]

I have reverted your edit to South Korea. The link to a disambiguation page is not helpful in that context. - David Biddulph (talk) 14:09, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. – filelakeshoe (t / c) 🐱 12:19, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Similar disruptive behaviour to the last block - introducing factual errors / unsourced content. – filelakeshoe (t / c) 🐱 12:20, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Channel Orange. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 05:33, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Channel Orange, you may be blocked from editing. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 11:25, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 15:13, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Blonde (Frank Ocean album). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 19:03, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at To Pimp a Butterfly, you may be blocked from editing. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 05:30, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Blonde (Frank Ocean album). TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 19:35, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 19:45, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]