User talk:Pot8OKing

April 2024

Hello, I'm Rdp060707. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to SS Kaiser Wilhelm II—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. ----Rdp060707|talk 15:07, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Rydex64. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to SS Kaiser Wilhelm II have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. 𝓡𝔂𝓭𝓮𝔁 15:08, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Dadd. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ----Rdp060707|talk 15:11, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ok I'm sorry I made a edit on last words Pot8OKing (talk) 15:15, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to introduce jokes into articles, as you did at List of last words (20th century), you may be blocked from editing. Wikipedia is a serious encyclopedia, and contributions of this type are considered vandalism. ----Rdp060707|talk 15:14, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

my friend made me Pot8OKing (talk) 15:15, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

he said he would tell everyone a embarassing secret about me Pot8OKing (talk) 15:15, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

where is sandbox Pot8OKing (talk) 15:16, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

where sandbox Pot8OKing (talk) 15:16, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent further vandalism, as you did at Edit.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 15:25, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Pot8OKing (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I should be unblocked. I was trying to help on the Edit page. Pot8OKing (talk) 15:27, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 15:29, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Pot8OKing (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand that I was vandalizing some pages. I understand I shouldn't do it again. I hope I could be unblocked, and start helping Wikipedia again. It was a joke, but a bad joke. Pot8OKing (talk) 17:51, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Since you are willing to vandalize Wikipedia when a friend pressures you to, it's probably best for Wikipedia to leave you blocked to prevent that possibility, and until you mature more as a person. If you want to be unblocked, please tell a specific, substantive edit you would make to an article. Not just fixing spelling or grammar, something substantive. 331dot (talk) 19:51, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Just some free advice, perhaps consider if a friend who pressures you to do something bad is really a friend. 331dot (talk) 19:52, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Pot8OKing (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

You must have misunderstood me. My friend took my laptop and made some edits. I am sorry about this inconvenience. Please do not judge my account for his actions. As for helping Wikipedia, a significant edit I would make to tons of pages is to be a page watcher. I would like to monitor pages and not let people vandalize them, as my friend did with my laptop :( I would create some pages about no vandalizing and all about Wikipedia. Could I be unblocked from editing because of these reasons? Pot8OKing (talk) 13:24, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

"Someone else did it" is not a convincing lie. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 15:55, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I didn't misunderstand anything, but your story seems to be changing. Are you saying your friend used your account to make edits? Being a "page watcher" is not an example of a specific edit you would make to an article. 331dot (talk) 13:44, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Pot8OKing (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My friend said the second to last message. He was trying to get me unblocked. I understand that what he did was wrong. and I would like to create some pages about not making the same mistake I did. Can you give me a chance? - Pot80King Pot8OKing (talk) 12:11 pm, Today (UTC−4)

Decline reason:

I'm afraid I don't unblock compromised accounts. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:21, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Since you are saying someone else operated your account, it will need to remain blocked as compromised. You're not helping yourself here. 331dot (talk) 16:23, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is getting ridiculous. You keep blaming other people for things that your account does. Enough of that. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 00:25, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

Proposed deletion of File:Giga Chad.Gigagiaga.svg

The file File:Giga Chad.Gigagiaga.svg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Creator is indefinitely blocked. I don't think anyone else will find it useful.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. jlwoodwa (talk) 04:38, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]