User talk:Pro95mustafa

This is Pro95mustafa's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Anas Morshed (May 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

The submission appears to be written in Arabic. This is the English Language Wikipedia; we can only accept articles written in the English Language. Please provide a high-quality English Language translation of your submission. Otherwise, you may write it in the Arabic Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Anas Morshed and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Anas Morshed, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 06:15, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pro95mustafa! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 06:15, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Anas Morshed (May 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Sulfurboy were:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Anas Morshed and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Anas Morshed, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 10:03, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Anas Morshed

Hello, Pro95mustafa. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Anas Morshed".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 22:38, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Yesar Al-Maleki

The article Yesar Al-Maleki has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No independent coverage, does not meet WP:GNG. H-index does not appear to be high enough to be considered on an WP:NACADEMIC basis

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 20:39, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Raed Faisal Alhuwaizi moved to draftsapce

An article you recently created, Raed Faisal Alhuwaizi, is not suitable as written to remain published. The person about which you wrote is non-notable. It fails WP:GNG, WP:PERSON, that is- the dentist hasn't made any notable contributions or got notable awards at highest national level. There is nothing notable in search. Besides, a biographic article needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. A.A Prinon (talk) 06:18, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi A.A Prinon, Well, I am confident that he's well known and noticed in the Iraqi society, but as you may or may not know, Iraqi media in recent years was depending mostly on social media platforms even the official outlets, such as the syndicate of dentists which is an official governmental entity posted on him more than once on social media (here). Their official website is not frequently updated and more than 100 doctors posted about him on social media platforms, of these doctors some are very well known, who are sad to lose him and his professional and scientific input. As for rewards he got awarded with more than 20 awards you can find the source here. I haven't added this yet because I'm trying to collect more than one source and if I can get certificate images but sadly the Iraqi media websites have issues because Iraqis don't browse websites all that much, instead they use social media platforms. If there is anything I can provide you with, please tell me, but I'm pretty sure that this doctor is well known in Iraq and I can provide his social media accounts links. Thank you. --Pro95mustafa (talk) 06:49, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Pro95mustafa I have explained my opinion or reason for moving your article to draftspace. Now, you just submit the draft for review. If a reviewer accepts it then it will be moved to articlespace. And if the reviewer declines it, you can explain him the comment that you left me. A.A Prinon (talk) 07:08, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

thank you A.A Prinon, and hope you stay safe

Hi A.A Prinon, and I apologize for disturbing you and I try to clarify the matter but no response, Is delay normal? What can I do?

@Pro95mustafa:, Though I'm not a reviewer, I'll try to help you. Actually, your draft was declined because of lack of enough notability proofs. See - Wikipedia:Notability. You said that the doctor was notable, got many rewards and contributed notably to the country. But I couldn't find anything related to the contributions of the doctor, his awards or even his death news in any popular news portal websites like Tehran Times of Iran, Aljazeera etc. And as you said that, there are some news of the doctor on social media. But actually, social media are not reliable because any person including I and you can also post anything on social media. And they are also difficult to understand because they aren't written in English language. However, please don't lose hope and stop editing articles. When I was extremely new to Wikipedia, all my articles were also used to be deleted. You can create article about any subject that has enough sources, notability and significance. You can also follow some good articles on Wikipedia to get ideas about editing. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

Your submission at Articles for creation: Raed Faisal Alhuwaizi (April 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CommanderWaterford was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Raed Faisal Alhuwaizi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Raed Faisal Alhuwaizi, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CommanderWaterford (talk) 08:13, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi CommanderWaterford I am confident that he's well known and noticed in the Iraqi society, but as you may or may not know, Iraqi media in recent years was depending mostly on social media platforms even the official outlets, such as the syndicate of dentists which is an official governmental entity posted on him more than once on social media (here). Their official website is not frequently updated and more than 100 doctors posted about him on social media platforms, of these doctors some are very well known, who are sad to lose him and his professional and scientific input. As for rewards he got awarded with more than 20 awards you can find the source here. I haven't added this yet because I'm trying to collect more than one source and if I can get certificate images but sadly the Iraqi media websites have issues because Iraqis don't browse websites all that much, instead they use social media platforms. If there is anything I can provide you with, please tell me, but I'm pretty sure that this doctor is well known in Iraq and I can provide his social media accounts links. Thank you --Pro95mustafa (talk) 08:20, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please read carefully Help:Referencing for beginners - not the amount of sources is important but the quality and all of your sources are not realiable ones, see here Wikipedia:Reliable sources. CommanderWaterford (talk) 08:46, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi CommanderWaterford Thank you for your response, as I mentioned earlier that the problem with Iraqi sources is that they do not use websites all that much, even for official governmental sources (such as the Syndicate of Dentists or the Ministry of Health) are more active and write official releases on their social media accounts more often than they do on their websites, if they even updated them. This doctor has been awarded on their website, he even has certificates from the Minister of Health himself, this is mentioned in the official university of Kufa website as you can find here The other problem is that half of the official accounts in Iraq don't go through the verification process so even though they are reliable sources, they don't have the verification badge. I hope that you understand how the situation is in Iraq, thank you in advance. --Pro95mustafa (talk) 09:08, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

CommanderWaterford Can you please check this link here it's Urubah Foundation for Human Rights official NGO, Which is verified by the Organizations Registration Department of the Iraqi government, It has published about the death of the doctor and helped orphans in their grief over the loss of the doctor, as mentioned in the description of the post, but everyone publishes in the social media and they don't have a website As well as many official parties which they do not own websites --Pro95mustafa (talk) 12:21, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Zahrat Al Khaleej moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Zahrat Al Khaleej, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:09, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Onel5969: Though unrelated, I want to say that the article was created on 20th of March. So, it has been too late for being draftified. However, I haven't made any reverts to your move. A.A Prinon (talk) 16:04, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A.A Prinon, why would you say it "has been too late for being draftified"? Where did you get that idea? Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:07, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

onel5969, Don't take it seriously. I just said that being wondered that for a month, no users including me noticed that the article wasn't suitable to remain published. Because, generally unqualified articles are moved to draft within couple of hours or days. However, don't be serious as this discussion is not a matter of worrying. A.A Prinon (talk) 16:15, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A.A Prinon, hi. I actually take my work at NPP pretty seriously. I think to take it cavalierly would be an insult to those attempting to write articles. I don't always get it right, but I try my best. I actually try not to draftify articles which have not been tagged for improvement, and I also try to wait at least 3-4 weeks after they've been tagged, in order to give the article's creator, or other editors, a chance to improve the article. Regardless, have a good day. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 04:13, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, onel5969 Hope you doing well, for Zahrat Al Khaleej is a famous magazine in the Arab world that began in 1979 source and is older than 40 years old as she realized her celebrity eligibility as it exists in Wikipedia Arabic So Can you tell me the reason for moving it to draft space? --Pro95mustafa (talk) 01:52, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. To show notability, you need several references which are in-depth about the articles subject, and are from independent, reliable sources. Currently, the article has zero of these, having a non-reliable source and 2 blurb pieces. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 02:36, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, can you see this please, 1 from wikipedia Arabic, 2 from Alittihad Newspaper as you can see the reference in the article itself all of that is independent and reliable sources and see this 3, thank you--Pro95mustafa (talk) 20:03, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Raed Faisal Alhuwaizi (May 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by JavaHurricane was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This is still the text book example of a résumé. See WP:WBA for help on writing better articles.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Raed Faisal Alhuwaizi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Raed Faisal Alhuwaizi, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Java Hurricane 03:46, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Haider Alnuaimi moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Haider Alnuaimi, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. In addition, there is a WP:COI or WP:UPE issue. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, and have addressed the UPE/COI issue, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Do not move the article back into mainspace yourself.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 00:03, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tia Alkerdi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tia Alkerdi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tia Alkerdi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Boleyn (talk) 21:29, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zahrat Al Khaleej (August 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hatchens was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Zahrat Al Khaleej and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Zahrat Al Khaleej, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hatchens (talk) 03:03, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Haider Alnuaimi (August 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hatchens was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Haider Alnuaimi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Haider Alnuaimi, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hatchens (talk) 03:07, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Raed Faisal Alhuwaizi (December 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by S0091 were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Raed Faisal Alhuwaizi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Raed Faisal Alhuwaizi, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 18:42, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Haider Alnuaimi

Hello, Pro95mustafa. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Haider Alnuaimi, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:02, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Haider Alnuaimi

Hello, Pro95mustafa. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Haider Alnuaimi".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:08, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Digital Media Center

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Digital Media Center, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. DMySon (talk) 16:35, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Zahrat Al Khaleej

Hello, Pro95mustafa. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Zahrat Al Khaleej, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:35, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Haider Alnuaimi

Hello, Pro95mustafa. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Haider Alnuaimi".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:20, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]