User talk:Progress4weegies

Problems with upload of File:Cessnock Subway-Underground - munroassociates.co.uk - design-design-graphic-cessnock subway files-Cessnock underground arch photo.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Cessnock Subway-Underground - munroassociates.co.uk - design-design-graphic-cessnock subway files-Cessnock underground arch photo.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 08:30, 5 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Progress4weegies

Thank you for creating Fairfield, Glasgow.

User:Insertcleverphrasehere, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

This does not seem to be a region in glasgow, but a the name of a single street. I'd cease starting new articles on 'areas of Glasgow for now without better references.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Insertcleverphrasehere}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

— Insertcleverphrasehere ^{(or here)}_{(click me!)} 04:46, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No, Fairfield is historic land that was established by the Barony in the 1700s. BAE systems was built on the land, which is vast and leads up to the wharf and waterside. Ask any person from the region, or any person that lives or works there - they will certainly know what Fairfield is.

It's in songs by Billy Connolly. It was in any Glasgow article to do with Thatcher and industrialisation.

It's was traditionally called salterscroft. Can also be referenced as the Govan shipyards. Please do a Google search on it.

Progress4weegies (talk) 05:11, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you could help me add in information, it would be much appreciated.

Areas such as this have been forgotten by Google maps because there is no Wiki.

Any edit I make has been researched.

https://maps.nls.uk/geo/explore/#zoom=15.98687712797152&lat=55.8616&lon=-4.3059&layers=5&b=1 Progress4weegies (talk) 05:13, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

https://maps.nls.uk/geo/explore/#zoom=15.014080768238175&lat=55.8638&lon=-4.3251&layers=5&b=1

That was supposed to be this, sorry Progress4weegies (talk) 05:16, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

https://maps.nls.uk/geo/explore/#zoom=15.348064993870004&lat=55.8454&lon=-4.3280&layers=5&b=1

Farmland and Barony owners of land is what founded Glasgow's labels, neighbourhoods and areas. I live along fro. waerieston. My Grandfather of Mosspark, that being 5 balloch gardens for 40 years called the area "Wearieston" by name.

This is a relevent label to anyone that lives in the community.

Proposed deletion

Proposed deletion of Sandyford, Glasgow

The article Sandyford, Glasgow has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of existence as a recognised populated place: name of a post office, a hotel, and a sexual medicine clinic but not on OS map.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PamD 18:24, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

https://goodmoves.com/jobs-in/glasgow/anderston-city-yorkhill https://m.yelp.co.uk/biz/sandyford-post-office-glasgow https://www.booking.com/hotel/gb/sandyford-lodge.en-gb.html https://scotlandschurchestrust.org.uk/church/sandyford-henderson-church-glasgow/ https://moovitapp.com/index/en-gb/public_transportation-Sandyford-Scotland-site_25821091-402 https://www.essentialosteopathy.co.uk/files/5115/2778/1847/Essential_Osteopathy_clinic_view_5.jpg

https://www.agoda.com/en-gb/the-sandyford-hotel/hotel/glasgow-gb.html?cid=-218

https://www.glasgowstudent.net/news/changes-to-sandyford-clinic-walk-in-services/

https://digital.nls.uk/directories/browse/archive/87840077

Sandyford, the westend of Sandyford. Did you even try to look? No you didn't.

Go away now.

Progress4weegies (talk) 17:44, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fairfield

Request for discussion

Hi, talk pages are for discussions. Therefore please use yours or mine to do so, thanks. Crowsus (talk) 22:11, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm doing all these stubs in a phone as my laptop broke down, its extensive work that needs done. We need to consolidate the regions of Glasgow as it's showing as fragmented on Google maps I do agree that pages and stubs can't sit empty for lenghtly periods, but if someone is showing to be working in them day-to-day then I don't see the major problem.

Having the articles or page showing as needing work brings people to contribute.

There are far too many people on here that don't actually contribute, but go around undoing other people's work. People subscribed to "new pages" and "list updates" but aren't actually adding to the history.

It makes it difficult for areas like Glasgow to get ahead. We have had full.communites ripped apart by motorways and expressways, and nobody has put the time in to reform the communities. Full areas ripped out for industrialisation and nobody thought to give the communies back their labels there after.

If you aren't willing to help me, please give me a wee bit of leeway or help protect the advancement without other wiping it needlessly. I don't see anyone in GCC doing it and it's protecting our culture.

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Ibrox, Glasgow into Moorepark, Glasgow. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 00:29, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Wearieston

Hello, Progress4weegies

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username JamesG5 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Wearieston, should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wearieston.

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|JamesG5}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

JamesG5 (talk) 01:05, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Fairfield, Glasgow

Hello, Progress4weegies

I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Fairfield, Glasgow, should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fairfield, Glasgow.

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top. Crowsus (talk) 01:48, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please update the Geo data on Kingston for me? Line the point up with the centre of kingston quay. Re-add the Geo data box. As I said, it has been taken off of Google maps because of this. I believe it might be because Kingston was labelled as being the middle of the motorway. I think it got Kingston, mixed up with Kingston Bridge.

Grazi. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Progress4weegies (talk • contribs)

Deletion discussion about Langshot

Hello, Progress4weegies

I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Langshot, should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Langshot.

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top. Crowsus (talk) 03:00, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The person that added the Street known as Gallowgate? Is disputing my addition of actual land?

If this gets taken down, your additions do too my friend.

I look forward to showing you the literature as to how areas and neighbourhoods were formed by selling off land in Scotland.

Can I just say, I am employed by those businesses in Langshot to develop their Business district BID. You can go along the units, shops or dwellings at the Langshot area (same with a few other neighbourhoods south of the Clyde. If you actually look at the businesses instead of plodding along on street view, you will realise that a lot of them do have the "Langshot" label. This is pathetic. I really don't think any of you have actually tried. Na

Neighsayers.

I am going to be reporting you all. You haven't even tried. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Progress4weegies (talk • contribs) 5:44, 19 December 2019 (UTC)

December 2019

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. IlluminatingTrooper (talk) 05:11, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I updated my sources. The sources are relevant in Scotland by Scottish land law and Geography. There is nothing to discuss. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Progress4weegies (talk • contribs) 06:03, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Once an AfD discussion has been opened the discussion must be allowed to continue. Your second removal of an AfD template is repeated disruptive editing. If you do anything similar again you will be reported at WP:ANI. PamD 07:48, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. --PamD 08:58, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Signing

Please sign and date all contributions to talk pages and AfD discussions, even your own talk page: it makes it much clearer for other editors to see who said what and when. The easiest way is just to type ~~~~ . PamD 09:07, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Issuing level 2 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Langshot. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 04:05, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2019

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at Langshot, you may be blocked from editing. Isaidnoway (talk) 12:27, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

I've blocked you for one week because you keep repeatedly deleting and removing the AFD notices from the article you have created. You were warned several times to stop doing this, and are still persisting in doing so. If you wished to be unblocked, please assure us you intend to stop disrupting Wikipedia in this way. --Jayron 32 12:55, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]