User talk:IlluminatingTrooper

IlluminatingTrooper, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi IlluminatingTrooper! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cordless Larry (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:06, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

Welcome[edit]

Hello, IlluminatingTrooper, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of contents / Department directory

The Wikipedia Adventure (a tutorial orienting you with Wikipedia)
The Signpost, our newspaper

Need help?

Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations

Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:

Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help

Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.
If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills without changing the mainspace, the Sandbox is for you.

IlluminatingTrooper, good luck, and have fun. SharabSalam (talk) 05:27, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

August 2019[edit]

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Edith Alice Waterworth, from its old location at User:IlluminatingTrooper/Edith Alice Waterworth. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. -Liance^{talk/contribs} 03:31, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Edith Alice Waterworth has been accepted[edit]

Edith Alice Waterworth, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Thsmi002 (talk) 18:40, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Camp Wildwood[edit]

Hello IlluminatingTrooper, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Camp Wildwood, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: founded by notable organization, consider merging to its article per WP:ATD-M. If you are interested in learning more about how speedy deletion works, I have compiled a list of helpful pages at User:SoWhy/SDA. You can of course also contact me if you have questions. Thank you. So Why 07:19, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback granted[edit]

Hi IlluminatingTrooper. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have temporarily enabled rollback on your account until {{{24 December 2019}}}. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
Rollback should never be used to edit war.
If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Beeblebrox (talk) 00:05, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I don't usually do temporary granting so I'm not super familiar with this template but you get the idea. The reason I've done it temporarily is that right now you seem to be doing pretty good anti-vandal work, but you are at the very bottom (in terms of time on Wikipedia and number of edits) for even being considered for any advanced permissions. Your work is good enough that I'm willing to roll the dice and grant it for three months, at which time you can re-apply and if there's been no serious issues you can expect to get it permanently at that time. Beeblebrox (talk) 00:05, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mabel Jewel Baker has been accepted[edit]

Mabel Jewel Baker, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MurielMary (talk) 11:02, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

why you edit my revision? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jdrury697 (talk • contribs) 02:52, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback granted[edit]

Hi IlluminatingTrooper. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
Rollback should never be used to edit war.
If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! - TNT ^💖 18:11, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do continue to take it slow

- TNT ^💖 18:14, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Stupid Senseless Holiday[edit]

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Stupid Senseless Holiday, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 19:35, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:02, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 22[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Munsters, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Wizard of Oz. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Arch Mission Foundation, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. warmly, ezlev. talk 02:55, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sometimes WP:OR and WP:IAR is needed when the article is so biased and full of WP:FLUFF.IlluminatingTrooper (talk) 03:02, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021[edit]

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at User talk:Doggy54321. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. No one asked for your opinion on my signatures. If it’s not nice, keep it to yourself. Take your opinions on a holiday to Twitter, not Wikipedia. Thank you. D🐶ggy54321 ^{(let's chat!)} 18:28, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

First of all, it is not cool to attack anybody. Second of all, I agree with Doggy54321 that you should keep your opinion to yourself. I can tell that you don't like Valentine's Day, but please make sure to not attack other users with that reason. Another thing, please don't threaten other editors. You can express your opinion nicely and not attacking. Please let me know if you need any help. Jack Reynolds (talk to me!) (email me!!) 18:33, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]