User talk:Pschaeffer
November 2011
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Clements High School, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Dr.K. λogosπraxis 04:30, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
October 2020
[edit]Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at 2012 Benghazi attack. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- LuK3 (Talk) 14:57, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
Threats
[edit]Hello, Pschaeffer,
Please do not threaten other Wikipedia editors. You are free to present a case at one of our noticeboards, like ANI, but don't say you've "reported" an editor when you haven't put together a complaint. It serves to discourage and intimidate other editors and is not civil. Also, generally it's a really bad idea to share personal information like your email address on talk pages.
If you have questions about editing on Wikipedia, I encourage you to visit the Teahouse where editors can address your concerns. Liz Read! Talk! 22:54, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
October 2020
[edit]Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Talk:2012 Benghazi attack, you may be blocked from editing. Symmachus Auxiliarus (talk) 23:21, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
Discretionary sanctions notification
[edit]This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 04:01, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
Hello, Pschaeffer,
I'm just letting you know that your complaint is likely to be removed without being addressed because it was not complete or posted correctly, so it is impossible for admins to judge its merits. In just one example, you didn't state who this complaint was about, it simply says "Username" and not a specific editor. It also doesn't state which Arbitration decision this complaint concerns. It's impossible to state an arbitration decision needs enforcement when you haven't identified which arbitration case it concerns and which sanctions have been violated. My guess in your case is that it involves American politics 2, but this is your complaint so you will have to do the legwork here.
As an unsolicited opinion, you might have more success at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard which is a less formal forum for resolving disputes. A/R/E has more strict requirements and is less forgiving of errors. Good luck. Liz Read! Talk! 05:43, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
Apparent WP:BLP violations at 2012 Benghazi attack
[edit]Hello Pschaeffer. If the behavior described at Wikipedia:Teahouse#Talk page comments on Talk:2012 Benghazi attack continues you are likely to be blocked for disruption. Your edit here about Hillary Clinton seems to violate our policy on WP:Biographies of living persons. The text that you added was:
However, it became clear that Hillary Clinton lied to the American people about the attack. She publicly blamed the attach on a video while telling her own daughter (by Email) otherwise. Even the next day she was still publicly lying about the attach
.
Your addition to the article did not mention any references that could prove your claim. So, by our standards, your addition was unsourced defamation. Please reflect on whether Wikipedia is the right place for you to be expressing your opinions. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 22:52, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
Your thread has been archived
[edit]Hi Pschaeffer! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse,
|