User talk:Quatticapic

September 2010

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to D.W.Brown, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Dawnseeker2000 00:06, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Pumpernickle3 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Dawnseeker2000 00:10, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:DARK

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Draft:DARK, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://backwoodshorror.com/tags/dark-movie/.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 08:31, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

In respect to your note on the talk page, I have done a search on our OTRS permission files but cannot find your permission. Unfortunately, we processes many thousands of emails every week, and our search system is not always up for the task. I also did a visual scan of emails received around the time that you placed your note. If your email has already been assigned to an agent, it would not show up in our chronological list, so I might have overlooked it. If you have already received a response from an agent, please check your mail. There may be some other action requested of you before that permission can process. If you have not received a response, you may wish to re-send your mail, as it may have been lost in transit. If you need more information about this, please feel free to visit my talk page. In the meantime, the copied content has been removed from the draft.

I have placed a note on your talk page below, as it seems quite likely you are personally connected to the film. Please review our conflict of interest guidelines and note especially that if you are compensated for edits related to any subject, you are required to disclose this. Even if not, it's good practice to be transparent about your connection. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 13:12, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Quatticapic. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies. Note that Wikipedia's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 13:07, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: DARK (January 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MatthewVanitas was:

This submission's references do not adequately evidence the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of films and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:DARK and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MatthewVanitas (talk) 15:55, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Quatticapic, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MatthewVanitas (talk) 15:55, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: DARK (film (February 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:

This submission's references do not adequately evidence the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of films and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:DARK (film and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 (talk) 02:32, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: DARK (film) (July 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bilorv was:

Per WP:CRYSTAL and WP:NFF, we don't usually like to have article on films that haven't been released yet. There are not enough reliable sources in this draft that show notability; please consider waiting until the film has been released before resubmitting the draft, and make sure you include any reviews of the film to show it is notable.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:DARK (film) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— Bilorv_(talk)^(c)(e) 21:56, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:DARK (film) concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:DARK (film), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:DARK (film)

Hello, Quatticapic. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "DARK".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Anonymouspoutateoh (talk) 06:01, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Nick Basile for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nick Basile is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nick Basile until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DARTHBOTTO_talk•cont 11:26, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]