User talk:Qwerck

Disambiguation link notification for August 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Battle of Tonlé Sap

added a link pointing to Annam

Gena the Crocodile

added a link pointing to Roman Kachanov

Po Inu Nagar

added a link pointing to Serpent

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:23, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Littlemen moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Merry Littlemen. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs very significant work. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 10:30, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! (Qwerck (talk) 10:31, 29 August 2023 (UTC))[reply]

Love in Chains moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Love in Chains. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability, it has too many problems of language or grammar and taken to draftspace so that you won't be disturbed while developing it. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 17:38, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The Serf, or Love in Chains

Hello Qwerck,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged The Serf, or Love in Chains for deletion, because it's a redirect from an article title to a namespace that's not for articles.

If you don't want The Serf, or Love in Chains to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

FatalFit | ✉ | ✓ 18:28, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies, I misclicked. I meant to nominate for WP:R1 instead of WP:R2. If this was a typo just redirect it to the right page name and remove the speedy deletion tag. Thanks! FatalFit | ✉ | ✓ 18:30, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Ukrainian telenovelas

A tag has been placed on Category:Ukrainian telenovelas indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:13, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from United Front for the Liberation of Oppressed Races into Provisional Government of the Republic of Vietnam. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 20:42, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

South Vietnamese elections

Hello. Please could you stop adding the candidate list to the constitutional assembly article. It's unsourced, and clearly isn't a complete list. Cheers, Number 5 7 18:20, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please be aware of the WP:BRD behavioural guideline. If you make changes to an article and those changes are reverted, you should not reinstate them. Instead, you should start a discussion on the talk page and attempt to gain consensus for your proposed changes. Please stop reinstating your edits again and again. Thanks, Number 5 7 18:32, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In addition, what you have added to the 1966 election article is wrong. Those candidate lists are for the 1967 Senate election. Please revert your edits. Number 5 7 18:38, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I added some sources. You had better read a bit. I'm not being stubborn, however, you also shouldn't simplify words - because that's disrespectful to historical figures.

I've read them, hence realising not only were your edits unsourced, they were also wrong. Please undo your last edit to the 1966 South Vietnamese Constitutional Assembly election, which now contains incorrect information. Thanks, Number 5 7 18:41, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand, how can you read it and say it's wrong? Did the CIA lie? Besides, is it wrong if I change the spelling to make it better?

The candidate lists you added to the 1966 South Vietnamese Constitutional Assembly election are not for that election. They are the candidate lists for the 1967 South Vietnamese Senate election. Please undo your incorrect edit to the 1966 South Vietnamese Constitutional Assembly election article. Thanks, Number 5 7 18:45, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Failed verification tags

Please reinstate these tags. I checked the sources and they do not support the material you have added. If they are not reinstated, I will be requesting administrator action against you. Thanks, Number 5 7 19:13, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I has no problem with you, however, you are trying to attack me.

I am trying to ensure the information being added is sourced and correct. Please provide a source or reinstate the tags. You have also not sorted out the mess you made at the 1966 article yet. Number 5 7 19:16, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You are very persistent in insulting me, while the information is distorted more by you than by me. Maybe I'm not technically strong, but what you do is violating the right to freedom in public space.

I am not insulting you. I am trying to point out that you have added incorrect information to one article (the 1966 one) and asking for sources for what you are trying to add to another. All material added to Wikipedia must be WP:Verifiable – it is a core policy. If you had adhered to WP:BRD rather than kept trying to force your edits into article, the articles would not be in this mess because these matters would have been discussed on the talk page and resolved there, meaning you would not have reinserted clearly incorrect information to the 1966 article, and would not be adding unverifiable material to the presidential election article. Number 5 7 19:22, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have failed to remove the incorrect data from the 1966 article and not reinstated the failed verification tags. Once you do that, we can talk. Number 5 7 09:48, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

But I do not know how do.

You need to undo these edits (there should be an "undo" button). Please also stop changing the introductory sentences of the articles – what you are adding is not grammatically correct. Going forwards, stop reverting and discuss on the talk page if changes you make are reverted. Cheers, Number 5 7 11:48, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm trying, but you should really help me instead of trying to lash out. Just because I'm bad doesn't mean I "should be offended".

I have tried to help by tabularising details you are adding. Had you discussed on the talk page (as is expected of editors), I would have explained all the problems with your edits there. The problem is that you kept reverting and forcing your edits into the articles before the matters were discussed. Number 5 7 11:52, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

But now I've stopped, you saw.

You still need to undo these edits and it would also be appreciated if you could undo these ones too, as there are a few errors and formatting issues. The photo, commons category and one of the two external links (the Public Administration Bulletin) are fine, but the rest is problematic. Number 5 7 11:56, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 5

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Battle of Tonlé Sap

added a link pointing to Annam

Gena the Crocodile

added a link pointing to Roman Kachanov

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copying/translating content within Wikipedias requires attribution

Hi. I see in a recent addition to Thirteenth Tsardom you included material translatedx from ru:Тридевятое царство. That's okay, but you have to give attribution so that our readers are made aware that you copied the prose rather than wrote it yourself. It's also required under the terms of our license. I've added the attribution for this particular instance. Please make sure that you follow this licensing requirement when copying within Wikipedia in the future. — Diannaa (talk) 22:13, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Two remarks

Thank you for your intererest in contributing to Wikipedia. However your edits have two probjems: major and minor.

You are too liberally writing wikipedia articles. Please write in strict accordance with our basic rules about verifiability of information: all material must be attributable to reliable, published sources. See WP:RS and WP:CITE for details. Also pay attention to a common error called "synthesis"
Please avoid WP:OVERLINKING: do not link the same word repeatedly and avoid linking common words. - Altenmann >talk 01:17, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
P.S. Please also pay attention to "disambiguation link" notifications, such as above. - Altenmann >talk 01:25, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Once again, please do not add your speculations into wikipedia as you did in The Golden Ball (novel). If you disagree, please use article talk page. Please do not revert edits of wikipedians more experienced than you. - Altenmann >talk 16:16, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You must understand that, if Asians rarely read books, they will not understand the meaning of Orb, Ring and even Dragon like Europeans. I just said that's it ! You should not sit high up to teach people lower than you, because they cannot understand and have no responsibility to listen to you. (Qwerck (talk) 16:19, 12 September 2023 (UTC))[reply]
- And you must understand that Wikipedia has rules. If you write Orb (which meaning of the word "orb"?), Ring(which meaning of the word "ring"?), Dragon, then if someone does not know these words, they may click at wikilink an read about them. If you dont have responsibility to listen to experienced wikipedias, then you will run into troubles pretty soon, because, as I said, Wikipedia has rules. Therefore if you don't understand something, ask questions, not just revert someone's edits. - Altenmann >talk 17:04, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Third warning: Please do not add information into wikipedia without providing references as you did it in In the Country of Unlearned Lessons. By Wikipedia rules unreferenced information may be deleted at any time. - Altenmann >talk 05:02, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fourth warning: Please do not restore removed information in wikipedia without providing references as you did it in The Golden Ball (novel). By Wikipedia rules unreferenced information may be deleted at any time. If you do this again, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.- Altenmann >talk 05:07, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add external links to website that publish pirated texts of books as you did it in The Golden Ball (novel). - Altenmann >talk 05:07, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Thirteenth Tsardom has been nominated for renaming

Category:Thirteenth Tsardom has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Immanuelle ❤️💚💙 (talk to the cutest Wikipedian) 17:16, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Thirteenth Tsardom in fiction has been nominated for renaming

Category:Thirteenth Tsardom in fiction has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Immanuelle ❤️💚💙 (talk to the cutest Wikipedian) 17:17, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

WP:AN/I notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. - Altenmann >talk 05:25, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Bbb23 (talk) 15:58, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]