User talk:RORYwikiEMERALDpedia

March 2016

Please do not write or add to an article about yourself. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to an existing article about yourself, please propose the changes on its talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was my page deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss it with the deleting administrator. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 08:29, 27 March 2016 (UTC)Looking for MarchJuly.RORYwikiEMERALDpedia (talk) 21:18, 5 May 2016 (UTC)Attention: Peacemaker67. (( trying to chat with you )).RORYwikiEMERALDpedia (talk) 21:26, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Rory Emerald page

Hello, RORYwikiEMERALDpedia. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Marchjuly (talk) 10:23, 27 March 2016 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Proposed deletion of Rory emerald

The article Rory emerald has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. 331dot (talk) 11:40, 27 March 2016 (UTC) https://books.google.com/books?id=e29yCwAAQBAJ&pg=PA300&lpg=PA300&dq=%22Julian+Lee+Hobbs%22&source=bl&ots=hA8Wc2MF_M&sig=QUMlemMVDSHeHd8EMOU0NcXjk7Y&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwillYnT4- DLAhVB9mMKHZVvCXwQ6AEIVDAJ#v=onepage&q=%22Julian%20Lee%20Hobbs%22&f=false https://books.google.com/books?id=V-4JAQAAMAAJ&q=%22Julian+Lee+Hobbs%22&dq=%22Julian+Lee+Hobbs%22&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwia7uf94-DLAhUW0GMKHQFBBO4Q6AEILDAB https://books.google.com/books?id=2SbuAAAAMAAJ&q=%22Julian+Lee+Hobbs%22&dq=%22Julian+Lee+Hobbs%22&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwia7uf94-DLAhUW0GMKHQFBBO4Q6AEIMDAC https://books.google.com/books?id=KPFMAQAAIAAJ&q=%22Julian+Lee+Hobbs%22&dq=%22Julian+Lee+Hobbs%22&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwia7uf94-DLAhUW0GMKHQFBBO4Q6AEIQTAF https://books.google.com/books?id=lmLuAAAAMAAJ&q=%22Julian+Lee+Hobbs%22&dq=%22Julian+Lee+Hobbs%22&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwia7uf94-DLAhUW0GMKHQFBBO4Q6AEIOzAE https://books.google.com/books?id=zLUgAQAAMAAJ&q=%22Julian+Lee+Hobbs%22&dq=%22Julian+Lee+Hobbs%22&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwia7uf94-DLAhUW0GMKHQFBBO4Q6AEIRTAG http://www.apnewsarchive.com/1993/Man-in-Liz-Taylor-Hoax-Allegedly-Poses-as-Mia-Farrow-s-Personal-Shopper/id-6c37f291caadcff526ce1bd939f8d1b2 http://www.ocregister.com/articles/emerald-192251-says-ran.html http://amarillo.com/stories/012608/new_9428681.shtml#.VvfHvo-cF9A http://celebrityblogsburg.blogspot.com/2009/03/hoaxer-rory-emerald.html http://www.auburnjournal.com/keywords/rory-emerald http://hoaxes.org/weblog/comments/rory_emerald http://www.rochestermagazine.com/the/rochies/story-403.html http://www.capecodtimes.com/article/20080327/NEWS/803270325 http://www.deseretnews.com/article/272141/MAN-CHARGED-WITH-POSING-AS-CELEBRITYS-SHOPPER.html?pg=all http://lacrossetribune.com/mattjames/yes-the-possibilities-are-endless/article_ef435ed6-4f52-5a07-a3bb-eb47dbad8baa.html http://www.altoonamirror.com/page/content.detail/id/505317/Joke-s-on-us--Prankster-gets-hoax-ad-in-Mirror.html?nav=742 http://mtstandard.com/news/state-and-regional/mummy-hoax-meant-to-cheer-up-missoulians/article_92ca140b-5a69-5c3d-90f2-fd4608e6def6.html http://www.aspentimes.com/article/20080129/NEWS/639542547 http://ivo.co.za/2008/01/26/lost-nose-life-imitates-hoax-ad/#.VvfJx4-cF9A http://www.topix.com/forum/source/palo-alto-daily-news/TGTFH0MAF0ER776P9 http://www.upi.com/Archives/1990/06/13/Publicity-hounds-denies-role-in-Liz-Taylor-hoax/2113645249600/ http://community.seattletimes.nwsource.com/archive/?date=19911011&slug=1310322 http://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/uniontrib/20050620/news_lz1c20pubeye.html http://www.ebay.com/itm/1990-Press-Photo-Entertainer-Rory-Emerald-/280802687739 http://www.plainsite.org/dockets/2p6gc1fl4/superior-court-of-california-county-of-los-angeles/rory-emerald-v-news-america-publishing-inc-et-al/ http://screamermagazine.com/vintage-magazines/year-1990/screamer-magazine-march-1990/ http://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/2008/feb/24/you-found-a-what-prankster-pulls-one-on-readers/ https://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P2-4002735.html http://hoaxes.org/weblog/comments/serial_prankster_claims_to_find_time_machine http://articles.philly.com/1993-02-11/news/25956891_1_mtv-reporter-tabitha-soren-julian-lee-hobbs-prince-charles https://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=1957&dat=19900612&id=EnMhAAAAIBAJ&sjid=tIgFAAAAIBAJ&pg=5154,2825907&hl=en https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/lifestyle/1990/06/11/personalities/62ca7638-8667-45c2-ba27-34902238dbac/ http://www.elvicities.com/~presleyinthepres/2005a/200507g.html http://lennontwist.livejournal.com/ https://books.google.com/books?id=9BoIAQAAMAAJ&q=%22rory+emerald%22&dq=%22rory+emerald%22&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiqkOvY6uDLAhUM4mMKHenECV4Q6AEIODAF http://g1.globo.com/Noticias/PopArte/0,,AA1379748-7084,00-ATOR+DE+LA+BAMBA+E+CONDENADO+POR+BATER+NA+NAMORADA.html[reply]

Marchjuly, please send me a Facebook friend request. Immediately. <3 RORYwikiEMERALDpedia (talk) 08:18, 28 March 2016 (UTC) http://community.seattletimes.nwsource.com/archive/?date=19911011&slug=1310322 MarchJuly, Has anything changed regarding Rory Emerald? New suggestions please? Looking for MarchJuly or Cordless Larry.RORYwikiEMERALDpedia (talk) 21:11, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Rory emerald

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Rory emerald, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Theroadislong (talk) 12:25, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Rory_Emerald&action=submit RORYwikiEMERALDpedia (talk) 23:27, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 22:29, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Trying to chat with you but I'm not sure how? RORYwikiEMERALDpedia (talk) 23:34, 27 March 2016 (UTC) S. O. S. to Peacemaker67. How do I talk with you? Thank you![reply]

Hi RORYwikiEMERALDpedia. If you would like to post a message to Peacemaker67, then you can do so at User talk:Peacemaker67. Before you do so, however, I suggest you take a peek at Help:Using talk pages just to familiarize yourself with how to format, etc. talk page posts so that it's easier for Peacemaker67 to understand your question. You can also ping Peacemaker67 to your user talk page if you wish. You can do this by posting your message here (your user talk page) and beginning the post with {{ping|Peacemaker67}}. The system will notify Peacemaker67 that they have been pinged and they should respond to your post here. I don't recommend you try both pinging here and posting Peacemaker67's user talk; only one is needed and both is a bit of overkill. Be advised that it may take Peacemaker67 a little time to respond because editors are sometimes busy with other things so multiple posts/pings are not needed.

If you would like to request that your account be unblocked, then please read Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks and follow the instructions listed there. You can add {{unblock|reason="Add your reason for requesting an unblock here"}} to your user talk page below this post and Peacemaker67 or another administrator will review your request. Be advised, however, that administrators are likely to only unblock you if they feel you are sincere about being here to help build an encyclopedia and not only to try an promote yourself or something/someone else. Many administrators are willing to give blocked editors a second chance, but rants/complaints against Wikipedia or trying to pass the blame to others are generally things which do not go down too well with those reviewing such requests. You should try and and stay on point and explain why you feel you can be a positive contributor to Wikipedia as a whole if that's your goal. Your block may only be reduced from indefinite to a set period of time. If that's the case, then I suggest you use the downtime to better familiarize yourself with the way Wikipedia operates and what is expected of it's editors.

Finally, I also suggest that if you are unblocked that you do not try and recreate an article about yourself and instead try your hand at editing other topics that may interest you. Doing the former is almost surely going to be seen as being not here for anything other than your own personal reasons and will almost surely lead to you being blocked once again. If you feel you meet Wikipedia's notability guidlines for an article to be written about you, then please request that another editor do so at Wikipedia:Requested articles. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:44, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ping Marchjuly talk Oh my goodness, thank you for an eloquent very well written response. Now, let me see if this message gets to you. <3 RORYwikiEMERALDpedia (talk) 02:13, 28a March 2016 (UTC)

pingMarchjulytalk RORYwikiEMERALDpedia (talk) 02:14, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again RORYwikiEMERALDpedia. Yes, I saw your ping, but for a different reason than you probably intended. Two things about your post: (1) Please try to use proper indentation when you post. It makes things easier to follow. Refer to WP:INDENT for more informatkon; and (2) When you ping someone, use the markup {{ping|user name}} and do not simply type "ping" followed by other person's user name. "Ping" is a template so you need to use the curly brackets to make it work right. For example, I need to type {{ping|RORYwikiEMERALDpedia}} when I want to ping you. If I do it correctly, the end result will look like @RORYwikiEMERALDpedia: and you should get a notification (check the bell icon at the top of your user page). -- 02:26, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Marchjuly, I just wrote you a long message. Please tell me you got it? When I tried sending it something happened. Trying to retrieve it. RORYwikiEMERALDpedia (talk) 03:58, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

i received no such message, but that was because you've indefinitely blocked from editing. Unfortunately, this means you are unable to edit not only articles, but other pages such as your user page, the user talk pages of other editors and noticeboards/question pages like the Teahouse. My original suggestion to you about posting on Peacemaker67's user talk page was an incorrect one, so sorry for any confusion that may have caused. I suggest you ping Peacemaker67, ask for a little more detail as why you were blocked, and ask what you need to do to get unblock. You were blocked by Peacemaker67 for being here for reasons other than to help build an encyclopedia. You should discuss this with Peacemaker67 first or follow the instructions in the above template if you feel a mistake was made.

For reference, you still have access to your user talk page. This is currently your only way of communicating (via Wikipedia) with other editors, so be careful about what you post. You can post messages here for other editors to read and then ping them to let them know about the post, but whether they reply is completely up to them. If, however, you start posting long unrelated threads of stuff, complaints, lists of sources, reasons why you should have a Wikipedia article or other stuff that's too long to read, then those you ping are likely to just ignore you. It's also possible that administrator will consider anything too excessive to be disruptive and block you from even editing your user talk page. Right now, your primary focus should be on better understanding the reasons why you were blocked and what you need to do to get unblocked. Unfortunately, that is the Wikipedia-reality of your situation and you need to resolve your block if possible before worrying about any other stuff. -- Marchjuly (talk) 04:48, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Marchjuly, PLZ send me a FB friend request. Immediately. Thanks RE <3

Whatever interaction we have can take place on Wikipedia and should be limited to Wikipedia related matters. Anything related to Wikipedia should be discussed in the open on Wikipedia where other editors can see and comment as needed. I am happy to try and answer whatever questions you may have about Wikipedia editing, but I'm not looking for any more interaction than that and will only do so on Wikipedia itself. -- 08:42, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

Marchjuly, my apologies. Yes, I agree, everything should be out in the open. I just assumed that Peacemaker67 was going to block me all the way. My heart tells me that's what he wants to do. But I sure hope not. At the moment, only very short messages are getting through. I was trying to do everything the right way and still got burned. And for the record, I have no intention of doing a page about myself. I don't think it's even possible. Can we find someone else to do it? And, am I allowed to help? Or is that forbidden too? ✞RORYwikiEMERALDpedia (talk) 09:06, 28 March 2016 (UTC) https://books.google.com/books?id=e29yCwAAQBAJ&pg=PA300&dq=Rory+emerald+cashmore&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiwkL6IhOPLAhUHKGMKHfTiCqUQ6AEIHDAA#v=onepage&q=Rory%20emerald%20cashmore&f=false Author Ellis Cashmore said some very nice things about me in his new book. Marchjuly, I hope you get the chance to read it. I've been in many books, however, what Ellis said was special. ELIZABETH TAYLOR: A PRIVATE LIFE FOR PUBLIC CONSUMPTION 2016 [NEW][reply]

As I stated above, I think your current focus should be on better understanding why you were blocked and what you exactly need to do to get unblocked. The best way to do this is to ping the Peacemaker67 and simply ask. Listening to your heart and making assumptions as to why you were blocked or wondering about extraneous matters such as whether an article about you can someday be created is not going to help resolve your current situation in any way. If you wish to have your block lifted so that you can return to editing Wikipedia, then here's what you need to do.

Add the markup {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} (see Template:Unblock for details) to the bottom of your talk page. I suggest adding a level 3 subsection titled "Unblocked request" to make it easier to see. This can be done by adding ===Unblock request=== (three equal signs "Unblock request" three equal signs) to bottom of your talk page and then adding the template. Click "Show preview" to check your edits, but don't click "Save page" just yet.
Add your reasons for requesting to be unblocked after "reason=". Delete the "Your reason here" part, but don't delete the ~~~~ (those 4 tilde add your signature and time stamp, and you need those things at the end of your post) or the two squiggly brackets at the end of the post (those are part of the template markup and are needed for it to work properly). Try to be concise and contrite, so that the administrator who reviews your request can see that you understand why you were blocked and that you truly intend to be a more productive editor in the future and that they don't have to read a multiple paragraph manifesto. Word to the wise, if you post something rambling, filled with links or stuff about the books you've been in, etc., etc. the reviewing administrator is likely going to see that as a failure to get the point and decide that you are really not here to help build an encyclopedia. Everyone makes mistakes, and administrators are willing to give even those who have been blocked a second chance if they show signs of becoming a productive editor; they will not, however, unblock someone whom they feel is just wasting their time. After adding your reason, click "Show preview" to review. If everything is as you want it, click "Save page". If not, go back an change things until they are.
Wait for an administrator to review your request. It could be Peacemaker67 or it could be another administrator. This may take a little time, so you need to be patient. Do not post multiple request in the hope of speeding things up. That will actually have the opposite effect and be seen as disruptive.
The administrator who reviews your request will explain their decision. Read that carefully because it may contain certain conditions you need to follow if the administrator decides to unblock you or certain things you still need to show if they decide not to unblock you. Be advised that agreeing to any conditions attached to your being unblocked means that an administrator will not hesitate in re-blocking you if you violate them. Being indefinitely blocked does not mean you are blocked forever, but the reviewing administrator may simply feel that they have not seen enough on your part to unblock you at the moment. If that happens, do not immediately make another unblock request and hope that a different administrator will see things differently. This almost never happens and will almost surely be seen as disruptive. If your request is declined, then I would not post another one for at least a couple of months. I would also refrain from trying to use this user talk page as some kind of website to post your personal thoughts or opinions per WP:NOTWEBHOST. That will almost certainly lead to an administrator revoking you user talk page editing privileges. Best thing to do is to post nothing for a couple of months, and then come back an add another block request.

All of the above might seem like a lot to take in, but please read through it carefully and then take a look at Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks for more information. Good luck. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:49, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Many many thanks Marchjuly. Guys like you are few and far between. I've been reading everything over-and-over again; taking notes and writing things down. In your personal and professional opinion do you think a page about Rory Emerald should materialize. Marchjuly today you are Superman! — Preceding unsigned comment added by RORYwikiEMERALDpedia (talk • contribs) 16:17, 29 March 2016 (UTC+9)

This will be the only specific comment I'll make about your Draft:Rory Emerald or any potential article about you and it will also be my final post here for the time being. In my opinion, I do not feel you've established that you have received the significant coverage in independent reliable sources needed for a Wikipedia article to be written about you. Whether you are hoax is not for me to say and is something really only you know for sure, but it is likely that your draft will be deleted as such per Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Rory Emerald. It may be possible that another editor might feel there is enough to write such an article about you someday, and you can request such an article be written at Wikipedia:requested articles if and when you are unblocked, but that will only happen if it can be established that you satisfy WP:N. It's the quality, not quantity, of the sources that matter when it comes to establishing notability and what you've provided so far does not seem sufficient. -- Marchjuly (talk) 08:28, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize Marchjuly for only giving you [one source]. Here are some more whereupon establish "Rory Emerald" as a public figure, and a few other things. ✝ https://books.google.com/books?id=lmLuAAAAMAAJ&q=%22Rory+Emerald%22&dq=%22Rory+Emerald%22&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjtx-260eXLAhUS6WMKHWdYBi8Q6AEIMjAE https://books.google.com/books?id=V-4JAQAAMAAJ&q=%22Rory+Emerald%22&dq=%22Rory+Emerald%22&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjtx-260eXLAhUS6WMKHWdYBi8Q6AEIPDAG https://books.google.com/books?id=9BoIAQAAMAAJ&q=%22Rory+Emerald%22&dq=%22Rory+Emerald%22&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjtx-260eXLAhUS6WMKHWdYBi8Q6AEIODAF https://books.google.com/books?id=zLUgAQAAMAAJ&q=%22Rory+Emerald%22&dq=%22Rory+Emerald%22&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjtx-260eXLAhUS6WMKHWdYBi8Q6AEIHDAA http://amarillo.com/stories/012608/new_9428681.shtml#.VvpS2o-cF9A http://g1.globo.com/Noticias/PopArte/0,,AA1379748-7084,00-ATOR+DE+LA+BAMBA+E+CONDENADO+POR+BATER+NA+NAMORADA.html http://hoaxes.org/weblog/comments/rory_emerald http://www.ocregister.com/articles/emerald-192251-says-ran.html http://www.senore.com/Who-can-prove-that-Rory-Emerald-exists-q2759435 http://screamermagazine.com/vintage-magazines/year-1990/screamer-magazine-march-1990/ http://hollywood-haiku.blogspot.com/2010/03/rodney-bingenheimers-english-disco.html http://www.rochestermagazine.com/the/rochies/story-403.html http://lacrossetribune.http://community.seattletimes.nwsource.com/archive/?date=19911011&slug=1310322com/mattjames/yes-the-possibilities-are-endless/article_ef435ed6-4f52-5a07-a3bb-eb47dbad8baa.html http://www.deseretnews.com/article/272141/MAN-CHARGED-WITH-POSING-AS-CELEBRITYS-SHOPPER.html?pg=all http://articles.latimes.com/1993-01-27/local/me-1830_1_beverly-hills http://www.apnewsarchive.com/1993/Man-in-Liz-Taylor-Hoax-Allegedly-Poses-as-Mia-Farrow-s-Personal-Shopper/id-6c37f291caadcff526ce1bd939f8d1b2 https://books.google.com/books?id=e29yCwAAQBAJ&pg=PA300&lpg=PA300&dq=%22Rory+Emerald%22+farrow&source=bl&ots=hA8We-KFUJ&sig=AdrnYDVK0Hbt6gvLK_tJNu7NInw&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwj3qMGh1eXLAhUC_mMKHVzBA4UQ6AEIQzAG#v=onepage&q=%22Rory%20Emerald%22%20farrow&f=false https://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=1696&dat=19930126&id=Z7IaAAAAIBAJ&sjid=o0cEAAAAIBAJ&pg=6621,4671712&hl=en http://mtstandard.com/news/state-and-regional/mummy-hoax-meant-to-cheer-up-missoulians/article_92ca140b-5a69-5c3d-90f2-fd4608e6def6.html https://www.newspapers.com/newspage/19955948/ http://www.wuha.in/question/20060605212358AA6Loeh.html http://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/2008/feb/24/you-found-a-what-prankster-pulls-one-on-readers/ https://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P2-4002735.html http://hamsternames.info/Actor-G/Sydney-Greenstreet/index.html http://www.canberratimes.com.au/zoom/archive/rnews910813_0081_1914 https://www.newspapers.com/newspage/77669542/ http://www.elvisinfonet.com/oddspot.html http://www.az-encyclopedia.info/r/16101/ Marchjuly [absolutely not true, Victoria is a dear friend and that's all]. http://nobodysfriend.blogspot.com/2008_01_01_archive.html http://www.upi.com/Archives/1990/06/13/Publicity-hounds-denies-role-in-Liz-Taylor-hoax/2113645249600/ http://sfppc.blogspot.com/2008/02/prankster-slips-joke-ad-into-palo-alto http://www.elvicities.com/~presleyinthepres/2005a/200508e.html http://www.keepcalm-o-matic.co.uk/p/keep-calm-it-s-rory-emerald/ https://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P2-15351495.html http://first-thoughts.org/on/Rory+Emerald/ http://rnnx.com/thread-16124.html http://uk.qacollections.com/Wikipedia-archived-false-and-misleading-statements-about-Rory-Emerald-How-do-I-edit-andor-remove-content http://simpsontabhi.blogspot.com/2009/12/rory-merry-merry-pranksters-keep.html https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20120807202711AA9fdbo http://dictionary-webster-en.blogspot.com/2012/02/what-font-is-dictionary-printed-in.html http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archives http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archives Howdy Marchjuly, There are lots of stories that are the same andor similar. Those stories are usually AP, UPI, Gannett, Reuters, etc. However there are cartoon caricatures, editorial cartoons, heaps and heaps of stories about me that are completely different. Reader's Digest, the New York Times, Vanity Fair, Andy Warhol's Interview Magazine, all the tabloids here in the US and UK. Marchjuly, what do you suggest because I feel like I'm in way over my head. I stopped collecting stuff about me over twenty years ago. Unable to keep up. Again, thank you! MarchJuly, I have a question. Are you there? Desperately seeking Peacemaker67. Peacemaker67.RORYwikiEMERALDpedia (talk) 21:15, 5 May 2016 (UTC)Desperately seeking MarchJuly.RORYwikiEMERALDpedia (talk) 21:17, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]