User talk:Radhey100

Welcome!

Hi Radhey100! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Fragrant Peony (talk) 10:10, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Richa Rathore

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Richa Rathore requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Kleuske (talk) 10:42, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Richa Rathore

The article Richa Rathore has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. WWGB (talk) 11:55, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023

Hello, I'm Sumanuil. Thank you for your recent contributions to Rabb Se Hai Dua. I noticed that you added an image to the article's infobox as a thumbnail. In future, please do not use thumbnails when adding images to an infobox, as this is against the Manual of Style. When adding an image, supply only the filename to the |image= parameter and the caption to the |caption= parameter instead. The specific parameters for the image and caption may be different for the infobox you are using; please consult the Template page for the infobox being used on that page for proper instructions and documentation. Thanks! - Sumanuil. _{(talk to me)} 07:11, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Rabb Se Hai Dua, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. C1K98V ^{(💬 ✒️ 📂)} 09:04, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Rabb Se Hai Dua, you may be blocked from editing. C1K98V ^{(💬 ✒️ 📂)} 09:06, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Rabb Se Hai Dua. C1K98V ^{(💬 ✒️ 📂)} 10:07, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Lag Jaa Gale (TV series) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Lag Jaa Gale (TV series), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. EnIRtpf09b^{chat with me} 10:23, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023

Hello, I'm C1K98V. I noticed that you recently removed content from Lag Ja Gale without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. C1K98V ^{(💬 ✒️ 📂)} 15:38, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Durga Aur Charu moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Durga Aur Charu, is not suitable as written to remain published. An article needs more information and citations from reliable, independent sources to remain in the mainspace. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline, has suitable content and thus is ready for mainspace, click the Submit the draft for review! button atop the article. Silikonz💬 15:10, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023

Hello, I'm ManaliJain. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Kundali Bhagya seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ManaliJain (talk) 15:09, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kundali Bhagya. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ManaliJain (talk) 03:49, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Kundali Bhagya. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. ManaliJain (talk) 13:34, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Kundali Bhagya, you may be blocked from editing. ManaliJain (talk) 04:59, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Kundali Bhagya. ManaliJain (talk) 14:19, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. ManaliJain (talk) 05:14, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Apna Time Bhi Aayega

The French word is spelled "fiancé", not "fiancè". Jellysandwich0 (talk) 15:46, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Jayani joshi per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jayani joshi. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 15:02, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Radhey100 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I apologise to Wikipedia. I will make sure to abide by Wikipedia's guidelines anymore. I request Wikipedia for a last chance Radhey100 (talk) 14:26, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Please specifically speak to the reason for the block, abuse of multiple accounts. 331dot (talk) 14:39, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

{{unblock | Dear Wikipedia, I terribly apologize for my actions. I didn't mean to vandalize Wikipedia on purpose. I promise to abide by the rules and regulations of Wikipedia. The main purpose of mine was to add more information on Wikipedia. I promise not to repeat the same mistake. Please kindly let me know the expiry date of my block. Radhey100 (talk) 12:12, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Durga Aur Charu 2

Hello, Radhey100. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Durga Aur Charu 2, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:01, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Durga Aur Charu 2

Hello, Radhey100. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Durga Aur Charu 2".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 15:41, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]