User talk:Rahsin88

March 2016

Hello. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Antara Banerjee has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. JAGUAR 13:24, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Antara Banerjee

The article Antara Banerjee has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NACTOR. Blatant POV fluff, reads like a press release, not an encyclopedic article. Article would have to be rewritten from scratch to be acceptable. Likely an WP:AUTOBIOGRAPHY. More importantly, article indicates that she is currently shooting what would be her first lead role. Her earlier roles were either cameo or non notable and thus she clearly fails WP:NACTOR.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Safiel (talk) 16:20, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), such as at Talk:Antara Banerjee, please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. Safiel (talk) 16:24, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Dr. Madhuri Agarwal

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Dr. Madhuri Agarwal, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
It appears to be a clear copyright infringement. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. However, even if you use one of these processes to release copyrighted material to Wikipedia, it still needs to comply with the other policies and guidelines to be eligible for inclusion. If you would like any assistance with this, you can ask a question at the help desk.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Kolbasz (talk) 11:30, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

August 2016

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Dr. Madhuri Agarwal, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Pppery (talk) 15:13, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Deb. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.Deb (talk) 17:07, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Dr. Madhuri Agarwal

Hello Rahsin88,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Dr. Madhuri Agarwal for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Joel.Miles925 (talk) 17:47, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Rahsin88, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! 220 of ^Borg 18:22, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Dr. Madhuri Agarwal

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Dr. Madhuri Agarwal requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 18:29, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This account has been blocked from editing for a period of 3 days for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Rahsin88. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to make useful contributions. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. GAB^gab 00:38, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

February 2018

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for block evasion. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. GAB^gab 04:18, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi when I get unblocked from editing please help me with this it's almost 6 days and now also I can't edit any articles please help me with this Thanks Rahsin88 (talk) 17:55, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This account is not currently blocked. If you are unable to edit, please follow the instructions which appear when you attempt to do so. Note the warning at the bottom of the page, though. You must not edit without complying with our policies. --Yamla (talk) 18:02, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I again tried to edit I'm getting msg that I'm blocked and the error is:-

Your account is blocked from editing. The block was made by GeneralizationsAreBad for the following reason:

Abusing <a href="/wiki/Wikipedia:SOCK" class="mw-redirect" title="Wikipedia:SOCK">multiple accounts</a>: Please see: <a href="/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Rahsin88" title="Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Rahsin88">Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Rahsin88</a>

Please see and tell me what should I do Thanks Rahsin88 (talk) 18:12, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not aware of SUE

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rahsin88 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

sorry I was not aware of multiple accounts is not allowed but due to some technical issue I created another account sorry for now I'll make sure next time this will not repeat and give me permission to edit and make me contribute to wikipedia family by editing article thank you I hope u will understand my problem that I was not aware of creating another account Rahsin88 (talk) 05:35, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You clearly knew because you were blocked for this on the 21st and then continued to evade your block on the 23rd. I'm very surprised you were only given a 48 hour block on the 23rd. It would be much more common to block you indefinitely. Your next block will almost certainly be indefinite. Yamla (talk) 13:38, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I'll note that the edits you made were totally inappropriate, too. Any more of those sorts of edits will lead to your indefinite block, too. You should consider this your final opportunity to read WP:COI, WP:PAID, WP:PROMO, and the other policies you've been violating. --Yamla (talk) 13:40, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Declined blocked request

Hi yamla first of all I m very sorry for my mistake, i haven't edited article using I'd means not logged in I edited without login because I got resume tag that's the reason I edited the article for improving the article, I know that I was blocked for editing for 48 hours that's the reason I edited the article without logged I was not aware of that I can't edit article anyhow for 48 hours that's y I edited without logged I thought I can't edit using my I'd but I can edit without logged in I'm very sorry I'll not edit now but please help me with this as I'm new with this all and I'll never repeat my mistake and please unblock me Thanks Rahsin88 (talk) 15:41, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ip is same as account

Hi yamla I m sorry at the time of editing I was not aware of that without logged in and editing the article is same as logged in, that the reason I edited without logged in now I read the blocked user policy and get to know that ip address and logged in account are same next time I'll not repeat this mistake and please allow me to edit and unblock me I'm really sorry for my mistakes Thanks Rahsin88 (talk) 15:54, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Vijay Surase

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Vijay Surase, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Yamla (talk) 22:08, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dr.-Jayashree-Todkar.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Dr.-Jayashree-Todkar.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Yamla (talk) 22:14, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest

It's clear that you are editing in violation of WP:COI, WP:PAID, WP:PROMO, and WP:COPYRIGHT. This is an encyclopedia, not a business directory. Please do not edit any further until you have read and understood those policies and until you have explicitly declared your various conflicts of interest. --Yamla (talk) 22:17, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I read all the policies and I understood my mistakes and in future I will not repeat this please unblock me so I can give my contribution to Wikipedia and learn Rahsin88 (talk) 18:03, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock account

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rahsin88 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

its almost more than 6 days I'm blocked, I read most of the wikipedia rules and now I understood my mistakes and I'm ready to contribute in wikipedia again please unblock me and give me chance once again Rahsin88 (talk) 18:01, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This account is not blocked. If you are unable to edit, please follow the instructions which appear when you attempt to do so. Yamla (talk) 18:03, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Speedy deletion nomination of Tripti Gupta

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Tripti Gupta, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. FITINDIA 11:44, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

Because of your refusal to declare your conflict of interest and because you've continued to violate WP:PAID and WP:PROMO, I have blocked you indefinitely. Your reign as a digital marketer here, in violation of our terms of use, is over. --Yamla (talk) 14:13, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I got blocked for no reason

Hi, This is totally wrong that Yamla blocked me without any proper reason just blaming that I m using Wikipedia for promotion and advertising how he can blame me like this even after explaining that why I created another account that i was not aware of multiple account craetion after reading policy of multiple account i left that account. I'm writing all the content here for free not for money then also they are saying that I'm using for promotion or money please go through my all of the article nothing promotion content is there I'm just giving or writing information which is right and came in well-known news media. after getting deleted my article again I tried after 10 days to write the same article with modification tried more neutral way, then also they deleted my article without proper reason just saying you are promoting, advertising then what should I do how should I write content. I like to read and write that's the reason I started Wikipedia and mostly I read about doctors medical related things that's the reason I started writing on doctors which are really good and done good thing for people so I want to know public about their efforts but they thought that I'm advertising and deleted my all the articles even I read most of the rules of Wiki they have many different categories of article in which one category is Biography and subcategory in medical that's the reason I started biography type content on doctors but not like advertising way just normal neutral way please help me with my questions and please dont hurt anyone feelings before you dont know anything. I really like Wikipedia so please help me what I do and sorry I became little harsh

Thanks & I am waiting for your positive reply