User talk:Ravensfire/Archive 14

Archive 10

←

Archive 12

Archive 13

Archive 14

Archive 15

Archive 16

Archive for 2022

Vikcycircuit

Any idea who this is? It is obviously a sockpuppet of Wikicircuitz. I see you know quite well about them from your comment at ANI. I am unfamiliar with the case. This user is making disuptive changes and removing content just for reordering a cast member, which is also againt the poster billing, and edit warring for the same. What is happening here, are they sockpuppet or there are more? Which is the original account? (Let me invite Mrschimpf too for insight)--The Doom Patrol (talk) 13:26, 31 December 2021 (UTC)

@The Doom Patrol, it's certainly possible the same person is behind both accounts, but having multiple accounts isn't by itself against Wikipedia policy. WP:ALTACCOUNT covers having multiple accounts. The overlap between the accounts isn't that strong [1], but the edit summaries here are close and it's unusual to see editors with < 100 edits using terms like disruptive editing in edit-summaries. If both accounts aren't being used disruptively (and Wikicircuitz hasn't edited since December 14), that may not be a blockable offense. You can take it to SPI if you want, I probably would focus on the only active account and if the other becomes active again, revisit.

I can see you're in a dispute on Bro Daddy, currently with Vikcycircuit. You're throwing around the term vandalism and it's questionable there - good faith edits, even ones you disagree with, shouldn't be called vandalism. Some education could be helpful here, with a polite discussion (probably best on the article talk page) referencing WP:FILMCAST (and the template docs for {{infobox film}} and how that could guide the order. Using the article talk page would hopefully interest other editors on that article. Ravensfire (talk) 20:49, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

Edits are in violation of WP:ILLEGIT and WP:LOGOUT. You may be interested in Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Wikicircuit/Archive and User talk:Wikicircuit and [2]. Still ongoing: 175.145.180.163, 60.54.90.104.

You are victim blaming and justifying a vandal. Questionable? This person was trying to push Meena over top billed Kalyani. When did tampering the cast became good faith edit? Removing -578 size content and sources without explanation is not vandalism? not to mention the accusation "disruptive editing". FYI, I had started discussion at User talk:Vikcycircuit citing {{infobox film}} when it became clear that their intention was to edit war until the content is kept. I put that in user talk because the issue was not about Bro Daddy alone but going on in various articles to push their agenda. It was a mistake coming here.--The Doom Patrol (talk) 08:52, 7 January 2022 (UTC)

The same person making disruptive and removing content

This user 103.149.158.217, The same fan of Joythika I guess who consistently focus on puffing up Jyothika, List of awards and nominations received by Jyothika and focus on puffing down others by change the real fact of Indian film, actor articles and awards. I think this user is making disruptive and removing content before with different user ID. He/She consistently being disruptive right now. Please kindly investigate about this user — Preceding unsigned comment added by 175.142.84.239 (talk) 09:20, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

Thanks, I've added a SPI report - [3]. Ravensfire (talk) 16:13, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

See the best in the editings of an editor

Before you make anything. make sure you must see what is right and what is better editings... Not judge anyone on someone's doubt or anykind of their own selfish moves...see what clarity i have done in my edits and which alla reverted by some other unsigned anonymous users here... I.haven't made any vandalism or fan edits...each of my edits have proper sources and good edit credits.... Never accuse anyone for 1 or 2 mistakes whenever done... Hope you got what i meant... Hoping you understand the editor's wish not be suppressed by under an edit but wish to fly and rise more 103.149.159.224 (talk) 16:25, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

Please read WP:EVADE. YOU, the person behind the account, are blocked. Using new accounts and IP's to evade the block is not helpful. You need to address the reason your account was blocked in the first place. I'm betting that in part it involved edit-warring, minimal discussion and failing to follow Wikipedia guidelines. I'm going to be adding this IP to the sock report and asking the article be semi-protected. Ravensfire (talk) 16:48, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

Again the same person making disruptive and removing content

Please do something with this users 103.149.159.255, 103.149.158.2162. Shifting IPs, making disruptive, change the lead actors, removing content again and again here Rhythm (2000 film). Using so many user ID's making changes. It's said sockpuppet of [[4]] and currently partially blocked. But still the editor is attempting to edit-war in many pages with multiple accounts. Need protection for Rhythm (2000 film) as well — Preceding unsigned comment added by 218.111.17.247 (talk) 18:16, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Zindagi Mere Ghar Aana

Can you please look into again on user packer and tracker's edits in Zindagi Mere Ghar Aana whose edits over there is more of like WP:COI 202.41.10.102 (talk) 07:54, 5 January 2022 (UTC)

Please help with this disruptive editor

Again the same person with different user ID 223.228.183.6 making Content disputes and removing lead characters and fact which already there for a long time. This editor has repeatedly reverting the leads. His/her main motive is on puffing up Jyothika [[5]] , [[6]] , [[7]] to mentions her in leads, though she is in supporting character. Please help fix this problem. The page Rhythm (2000 film) need protection — Preceding unsigned comment added by 175.145.180.163 (talk) 09:08, 6 January 2022 (UTC)

175.142.84.239, 218.111.17.247, 175.145.180.163. You were warned multiple times against logged out editing. Now you are WP:EVADE. Stop fan warring and tampering content.--The Doom Patrol (talk) 09:00, 7 January 2022 (UTC)

Seeking help in blocking a user who is vandalizing

This request is in context of the article Ziddi Dil Maane Na. On the above mentioned article, some edits are being made which I consider vandalism since they are without any sense by a user User Talk:MoRanfaizi. I have even reverted them twice but the user again makes those same edits. Since you are a much more experienced editor than me, I wish to request you to look into the edits and if they are an act of vandalism, please take the required action.
--Natureisablessing (talk) 14:30, 13 January 2022 (UTC)

@Natureisablessing please read WP:NOTVAND - when they are making good faith edits, it's not vandalism, even if you really disagree with the edits. It's a content dispute, you both need to follow WP:BRD and I'm seeing a huge lack of D(iscussion). Also, remember I'm not at admin, I can't block anyone, just offer advice. If you took this to WP:ANI right now, you'd both be pointed to BRD and pointed to the article talk page. Ravensfire (talk) 23:33, 13 January 2022 (UTC)

@Ravensfire that's why I wanted to take an advice from you because I knew that I might be wrong too. Thanks for the advice!Natureisablessing (talk) 05:27, 14 January 2022 (UTC)

Dance vs dance (season 2)

Hi, I am Anushas09. I have read and acknowledged your comment on my talk page. This article was originally created under a different name but was changed by another Wikipedia user to the tile in subject with the same content included as the original one. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anushas09 (talk • contribs) 17:29, 19 January 2022 (UTC)

Deleted content

May I ask you why you had deleted my edits on the page "Chala Mussaddi - Office Office"??

Now, I have an reliable source. You may check yourself - https://www.boxofficeindia.com/movie.php?movieid=815 Bobe8q8661 (talk) 02:49, 25 January 2022 (UTC) Sorry, I understand why you deleted. Thank you Bobe8q8661 (talk) 03:32, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

Need help in publishing draft

Please sir/mam, would you like to help me in publishing my draft: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?preload=Template%3AAfc+preload%2Fdraft&editintro=Template%3AAfC+draft+editintro&title=Draft:Notable_incidents_caused_by_Manja_(kite)&create=Create+new+article+draft#

I don't no what to do and what not. It's been over 2 weeks and no any response by reviewers. Please help me.. Please.. Request — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bobe8q8661 (talk • contribs) 13:13, January 25, 2022 (UTC)

@Bobe8q8661: just be patient. There is a pretty substantial backlog of articles that need reviewing, and eventually someone will review your article. Ravensfire (talk) 18:34, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

Need help in getting back content

Dear sir/mam, please help me in re-gaining content from a recently deleted wikipedia article. I just want the content of that article back. Please help me!! Article link:[8]

Is there anyway to get the article back alive?

Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bobe8q8661 (talk • contribs) 09:23, January 27, 2022 (UTC)

When you click on the link, there's a reason given for the deletion which mentions the Article for Deletion discussion and has a link to the discussion. Click that and read the closing admin's comment. Ravensfire (talk) 15:13, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

Regarding false changes

Why are you removing the running time of the movie which is certified by censor board and who told you movie is going to release on 1st April what's the proof??? Don't change the information again without proof 106.200.246.238 (talk) 10:54, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

The date is sourced and you aren't giving a source for duration. Methinks one should look closer on a mirror before making accusations and consider a more collegial approach to your interactions. Ravensfire (talk) 13:22, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

Need help!

Please dear sir/mam, may you help me to use "Sort by" feature within "Wikipedia". I have a list of names which I want to sort in alphabetical order. Please help me.

Thank you in advance TriMain182681 (talk) 14:00, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

@TriMain182681 see the page Help:Sorting. Ravensfire (talk) 14:59, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

Deleted content

As you chopped out list of movies from this article [9]. Why you never take any action on this article [10]??

Thanks TriMain182681 (talk) 15:43, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

@TriMain182681 A list of movies shown on a movie channel? That's pure trivia and not something that belongs in an encyclopedia article. For anything else, see WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Yes, there are bad articles out there. That doesn't excuse making more bad articles. You're welcome to start a discussion on this on the article talk pge, but note you've been reverted by two different editors at this point. Ravensfire (talk) 15:48, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

Citations removed

I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. The video you are trying to use as a source is NOT a reliable source for Wikipedia articles. Please don't try to use it or any other videos from that channel. Ravensfire (talk) 02:44, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

Question from Dr. Nagi: Would it help if I referenced a page from my personal website that provides all the necessary evidence to support my claims? Understand that adding a link to a Youtube video as a reference/citation does not provide a reliable source. What are the rules of adding reputable source? Does it need to come from a big publisher for instance swissinfo.ch? I have seen people citing articles from the web, even from blogs or personal websites? Can that be used or not? Please clarify. You could have only removed the citations/references if you felt they were unjust, but removing entire sentences without having the knowledge of the material or the facts is simply unjust. You are depriving the public of valuable facts and information regarding the subject matter of interest, not every statement can have a reference or reputable citation source, some are just plain facts, if you wish you accept them or not. Please do not tell me about citations or references, I have published more materials and scientific articles in conferences and journals than you can ever imagine: https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=6_rP4K8AAAAJ&hl=en — Preceding unsigned comment added by Awyeahs (talk • contribs) 10:12, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

Please read some of the information that was linked in the messages on your page. Wikipedia articles need reliable sources to support information added to articles. The links you added don't meet the criteria, nor would links to your personal website. information added without a source generally is removed as readers cannot verify the edit. Ravensfire (talk) 12:48, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

Ishq Zahe Naseeb

59.103.218.16 (talk) The reception section of Ishq Zahe Naseeb has reliable and related appraisal references but not good details added by the users. Please, review the section and make changes. — Preceding undated comment added 12:18, 5 February 2022 (UTC)

Why don't you stop evading your block, Bttowadch and actually use the WP:STANDARDOFFER to get unblocked. If you had done that, you probably would be unblocked and not see your edits reverted again and again by now. Until that happens, I'm not going to spend my time dealing with someone who can't be bothered to follow Wikipedia norms. You still have some issues around sourcing, too much puffery in some articles and POV editing, but it's not as bad as you once were. Think on it. Ravensfire (talk) 15:51, 5 February 2022 (UTC)

ZEE5

Troll and now blocked Sockpuppet, sad to see an decent editor throw away their otherwise good reputation doing something dumb like this
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
I have seen your reverted one of my edits in the ZEE5 not a problem , but where did you learn zee-sony already merged  ? so far that deal not concluded so next time you revert kindly check that your reverted version related to the actual situation . or you reverted to a truth. FeelsHard (talk) 03:27, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @FeelsHard When you use a deceptive edit summary as you did, that will happen. Your edit was not "fix typo". Please be accurate with your edit summaries. Ravensfire (talk) 04:30, 6 February 2022 (UTC) So tell me you are doing Wikipedia edits for some kind of Points ? And who actually makes revert based on summary ? who told you that so next time before making a revert check 1) what words actually added 2)what is removed 3)what is the truth/relevant have a nice day... FeelsHard (talk) 05:05, 6 February 2022 (UTC) So tell me, are you? Are you just trolling? Either way, you finally clarified what you were actually doing, that's helpful. Ravensfire (talk) 05:13, 6 February 2022 (UTC) legend you got me FeelsHard (talk) 06:12, 6 February 2022 (UTC) FeelsHard: Got you indeed. Enjoy the block.--2409:4073:48E:2202:78A4:B29B:2684:FB66 (talk) 13:31, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

Double signing at RM

Hey! There is an option to suppress signing an RM, this is useful when you use the Visual Editor's new section which auto-appends signature, like this message, instead of using the source editing. Template:Requested move#Suppressing the signature or the section heading |sign=no :) — DaxServer (t · c) 10:17, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

@DaxServer thanks! I completely missed that, despite checking it over after posting. Ravensfire (talk) 16:52, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

Haha I miss it all the time as well 😂 — DaxServer (t · c) 16:53, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

Non-notable awards

Hi, A user, Lillyput4455 is adding the info of nominations and awards of non-notable awards such as IPPA awards and Fuchsia Magazine Awards in articles such as Aisi Hai Tanhai, Sammi (TV series), Khuda Aur Muhabbat (season 2) and Raqeeb Se and sometimes without any reference as well, they are not notable awards and also there is no no article linked to that awards, thus not satisfy the wiki criteria for awards. Please, guide the user about it and remove the awards if required. Qwef1234 (talk) 12:39, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

It happens, any not just by Lillyput4455. I removed the non-notable awards from some of those, and added "citation needed" tags for the major awards that need a source but should be easy to get ([11] for example). Polite discussion should work. Ravensfire (talk) 14:45, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

Imran Aslam

Hi this is Imran Aslam here, and this is my own profile that we are talking about i have updated a correct information in the profile of Wikipedia including my date of birth and projects details kindly acknowledge Imranaslam8 (talk) 02:33, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

@Imranaslam8, that's what I was guessing. So here's the issue. First, nobody actually knows if you are that person or not. I'm sure you can understand that. Second, and the main one, regardless, Wikipedia articles must be supported by reliable sources so that the reader can verify the information. This is especially true of articles related to living persons. Third issue, there's a significant measure of conflict of interest by editing your own article. You will naturally be include to accentuate positive while shading against anything else. The preferred approach is for article subjects to use the article talk page to suggest edits, but not actually edit their article.

The sourcing aspect is something key - you cannot add something to the article that is not supported by a reliable, secondary source. No, you are not a source, a reader cannot ask you to verify the information. Please read some of the links in the message I left you about autobiographical editing. Ravensfire (talk) 02:40, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

Hi, this is Imran Aslam here and the profile details were missing or changed i dont why so i updated it kindly acknowledge, have also updated the details regarding the projects i have done please feel free to ask me a question Imranaslam8 (talk) 02:37, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

Read the above message as well as the messages left on your talk page. Ravensfire (talk) 02:43, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

Ok than if thats the case than kindly update the date of birth to 8 july 1981 and i was born in karachi, readers should not we mislead by false information thats why i updated but if there is an issue you update the details for me please for an assurances i have given you the link to my Facebook account which is verified, Wikipedia is all about correct information if the information is not correct than i find it not better than any low profile website that has false information https://www.facebook.com/imran.aslam08 Imranaslam8 (talk) 02:50, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

Federal Reserve talk page FAQ

I've written a new talk page FAQ. I wonder if you'd mind reviewing it. 67.180.143.89 (talk) 02:32, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

Puffing up actress with unsourced puffery,

This IP 117.230.42.129 , 106.200.30.132 Jyothika pro puffing up her with unsourced puffery. Dispute content and fact [12] [13]

Please check the same references provided for each Cinema express awards she won - List of awards and nominations received by Jyothika

Also this , [14] edits of the same person. Senior actor should be on top. But this user top billing Jyothika while downgrading others.

Please check all the unsourced and fake references provided for each awards here List of awards and nominations received by Jyothika — Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.54.96.132 (talk) 23:35, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

Seriously, both of you are non-stop edit-warring over useless crap. Award articles generally show the most recent winner, NOOT puffing up your favorite actress. You both need to use the article talk pages. If needed, I'll start getting these pages semi-protected and force you both to talk. Ravensfire (talk) 00:03, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

I have seriously no idea what is going on here. Honestly I never returned to tamper the cast, dispute, puffing up or degrade other. I have no intention to do vandalism at all here. The User so called Jothika pro keeps reverting the cast, facts, awards, already listed in advance. The user vandalizing the fact. If can please range block the Pro IPs

Surgical strike and disputed POV edits

So according to you any disputed should not be added and should be discussed about it on "talk page" should get "consensus" before adding. If we follow this "Rule" , should half of wikipedia be deleted? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amanraj13 (talk • contribs) 07:21, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

@Amanraj13 When something has been removed multiple times from the article before AND there have been discussions on the talk page where that material should be removed, then yes, it should be removed. Especially when it's a one-sided, highly POV sourced only to partisan sources. Ravensfire (talk) 16:44, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

Move my page draft to public

Hi Ravensfire, can you move my page - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Devi_Chitralekha because i didn't the right's to move from draft. Thanks in Advance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ammyronce (talk • contribs) 10:55, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

I've added a template at a the top that gives you a way to submit the article for review. I'm not a reviewer, so I can't do that, but from just a quick scan, it's unlikely to be accepted. There's a fair number of places where you need sources to support the information. The entire early life section needs to be supported by good reliable sources. There are several other places that need to be rewritten - remember this is an encyclopedia, not a personal blog or website for the person. I've also got concerns about the images used. The uploader doesn't appear to know much about copyright and has had quite a few images deleted already. All of these are claimed as "own work" which is quite unlikely. They've probably been downloaded from a website and don't have the stated license. Ravensfire (talk) 14:28, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

Help in uploading "non-free" file

Hi Ravensfire, may you please help me in uploading a non-free file? Unlike before, when I go for upload, it redirects me to the "same page". I was unable to upload my file and looking for a solution.

Link: [15]

Please help me. Thank you. Bobe8q8661 (talk) 04:40, 20 February 2022 (UTC)

@Bobe8q8661, there shouldn't be a reason you can't. The File Upload Wizard is the right place to start, and you would click on the Upload a non-free file. The page title stays as File Upload Wizard, but now it's got the steps to walk you through the upload process. If you're really struggling, you might try the Special:Upload form or the Special:Upload/old old upload form. Ravensfire (talk) 17:29, 20 February 2022 (UTC)

Removing awards and honour

This SaNaNtha Hegde sockpuppet of [[16]] is back reverting and vandalism with disruptive edits over the pages. At Meena (actress), Vani Bhojan — Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.54.88.20 (talk) 07:52, 25 February 2022 (UTC)

Blocked later on 25 Feb as a sock of Eswaran Naveen. Ravensfire (talk) 14:11, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

Darft: Lovepanti

Ise darft me wapas kyo kar diya gaya Rk12345678 (talk) 11:50, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

@Rk12345678 It's not ready, wait for it to be accepted by a reviewer. At a minimum, you need to add some reviews that it's gotten. Ravensfire (talk) 13:58, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

Please ise sudharne me meri madad kar dijiye Rk12345678 (talk) 11:20, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

@Rk12345678 please use English to communicate with other editors. Ravensfire (talk) 14:02, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

Sunny Prajapati

I've written this autobiography up for a deletion discussion, so I am going to revert your redirection to the draft, just so that we can have the greater formality of AFD. The draft and the article may wind up both being deleted as G5 if the originator is blocked as a sockpuppet, but that is still also in the process. Robert McClenon (talk) 17:26, 1 March 2022 (UTC)

@Robert McClenon sounds good to me - that will stop long-term disruption with an easy tag to delete. That article was just a mess - worse than the draft if that was possible! Ravensfire (talk) 17:27, 1 March 2022 (UTC)

Okay. Originating account is a sockpuppet of a blocked promotional account. They waited three months after the previous account was blocked, so that the checkuser data has gone into the bit bucket, so the duck test will have to apply without microscopic analysis of the feathers. Robert McClenon (talk) 17:34, 1 March 2022 (UTC)

Socks in a promotional article related to Indian film / television. What a concept! </sarcasm> Thanks for the update! Ravensfire (talk) 18:05, 1 March 2022 (UTC)

The promotional article is now also in the G5 bit bucket because it was written by a sock. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:13, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

Perfect - thank you for the update and pushing this through. Ravensfire (talk) 17:28, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

Jagannath Aur Purvi Ki Dosti Anokhi

Hi Ravensfire, I saw your reply on the talk page of Jagannath Aur Purvi Ki Dosti Anokhi. I clearly agree that the show doesn't have much citations but what can I do if there is nothing, if there is any other solution tell me and Is there any possibility that the Article can be approve? If not after how much time it can rejected? Thank You Wikiuser829 (talk) 15:01, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for the Information

Hi Raven, I want to thank you for providing me info about citation. I will include citation in forever company article for adding information.

As i think that information is important for people to know and read about it on wikipedia. 106.206.241.230 (talk) 20:33, 18 March 2022 (UTC)

Please note that the websites you were using on your previous edits to Forever Living Products were not reliable sources and what was being added was purely promotional in nature. Edits of that type and/or using those sources will be removed.Ravensfire (talk) 15:50, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

Lock upp

Hello, I just wanted to tell regarding lock upp show. 1. Inmates - their profession is written after rhat their charge is written in italic font with it. Pls don't change it as it is important. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 106.207.221.170 (talk) 15:27, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

No. Don't use italics like that. Wikipedia has a WP:MOS that needs to be followed. Ravensfire (talk) 15:30, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

Moving to draft twice

Hi, please see WP:DRAFTOBJECT as your second drafting of Draft:Baba Ki Rani was in contravention of this policy, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 11:43, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

@Atlantic306, yeah, I'm aware of it. I've been going under WP:IAR - the alternatives have been AFD or take the editor to ANI for repeatedly moving articles out of draft when they aren't ready. Any thoughts on that? Ravensfire (talk) 14:27, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

AfD is the proper option if you think it should be deleted or adding notability tags, there is also redirect but if its reverted it would mean AfD. WP:IAR re-drafting is not a good option, as it would be no defence against edit-warring and could result in a boomerang at ANI, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 14:31, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

Also the drafting limits have just been strenghened as shown here, Atlantic306 (talk) 14:37, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

Yeah, I knew about the 90 days and honestly that's reasonable. Dealing with unreasonable editor now will take substantially more time. I get the reasons, but it's just going to be taking people to ANI now when they start doing this kind of thing. More time sink. More WP:BURO when returning to draft is much cleaner. Less likely I'll be doing as much of this. Ravensfire (talk) 14:44, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

Blocking user who is vandalising and using abusive language

Recently, I come through a user named: Yankoshbadal (User:Yankoshbadal).

He/she had recently changed some contents (actually, he/she undid my revision) on article [17] without giving any single reason. I think it is known as "vandalism" on Wikipedia.

He/she also used abusive language on my talk-page. You can go and check my talk-page history.

Culprit user link: [18]

Culprit user name: Yankoshbadal TriMain182681 (talk) 04:59, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

@TriMain182681, I'm not an admin (and have zero desire to be one!). However, that edit was NOT vandalism. It's one that you don't like, but it's not vandalism - please read WP:NOTVANDAL for what is and is not vandalism on Wikipedia. I noticed that they did explain why in an earlier edit summary. You did leave a message on their user talk page, which is good, but they did give a reason for why they made the change. They did leave a message on your user page, which was the wrong place, but this is a new editor, a polite message about the right place to leave a comment would have been helpful. Their subsequent remark was out of line, but that just merits a warning at this point. Ravensfire (talk) 14:43, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

Help!!

Can you make wikipedia page for Priya Ahuja, she is well known actress worked on many shows and films like Taraakh Mehta Ka Ooltah Chashmah, The Stoneman Murders, etc. It will be a great help. Qpms (talk) 15:51, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

Khidmat Guzar and Kountry Luv

The originator of these articles, User:Lillyput4455, has copied them back into article space after you moved them into draft space. I have redirected the drafts from draft space into article space. So they can either be left in article space or taken to AFD. I haven't reviewed whether the sources are reliable and secondary, and don't plan to do that. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:51, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

Thanks. At this point, AFD and then probably ANI for Lillyput4455 is the way to go. Ravensfire (talk) 17:01, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

Reverting edits

Sorry I didn't get it why you reverted my edits? Can you tell me please? Sidhu Shubh Shash (talk) 15:55, 5 April 2022 (UTC)

@Sidhu Shubh Shash, please read WP:CATEGORY. Generally, if a more precise category is already in the article, parent categories should not be included. For example, Category:Zee Bangla original programming has Category:Bengali-language television programming in India, so that category (Bengali-language television programming in India) should not be included in articles that have the more specifici Zee Bangla original programming category. Ravensfire (talk) 15:59, 5 April 2022 (UTC)

Okay thank you for telling the actual reason. Sidhu Shubh Shash (talk) 16:02, 5 April 2022 (UTC)

Sorry for not leaving you a message after the first couple of reverts, I try to do that, but was caught up in the cleanup and didn't get a chance to do so. Categories are a pain sometimes, especially for newer editors. Ravensfire (talk) 16:07, 5 April 2022 (UTC)

New articles in mainspace and they shouldn't be there:

The newly created articles like Dil Haari, Haya Kay Rang, Mere Khwab Lauta Do and Na Katro Pankh Mere are in worst conditions, have references of blogs and trash websites and have no citations from reliable sources expect one in Na Katro Pankh Mere. Please review these articles. 59.103.216.228 (talk) 09:55, 9 April 2022 (UTC)

Always humorous to see a Bttowadch sock trying to get articles deleted. Hmmm, hoping to get paid for creating them yourself? Ravensfire (talk) 20:59, 9 April 2022 (UTC)

Request

@Ravensfire: Sir, are you a "global" pending changes reviewer? If yes, then kindly revert the last edit on hi:अलका नूपुर as it is vandalism. Thanking in anticipation. 117.234.164.36 (talk) 14:17, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

Sorry, I don't have that role. Ravensfire (talk) 16:03, 12 April 2022 (UTC)

Reverting all edits made by a sock

Hi, I am Itcouldbepossible! Recently I saw that you had opened an SPI case against Sidhu Subhas Babu, and now CU has confirmed them to be a sockpuppet of YAM. Good catch. But alongside this, I saw that you have reverted each and every edit made by Sidhu. Was it really needed? Can it be actually done? For example, the sock could have made some useful edits as well, like improving articles or stuff. Maybe 98 percent of his edits were bad faith, but some could be good faith as well. Consider this edit. It was made in good faith and what he was merely doing was add TRP ratings to a TV show with reliable sources. So should edits like this be reverted even if they are a sockpuppet. I am new out here, but I think what you have done from your side needs justification. How would you have reverted if the sock would have made, say around 5000 edits? Is there a policy of reverting edits made by a sockpuppet especially when the edit actually isn't disruptive and improves the article. Would you please take a moment to explain me this facts? Don't really know how many good edits were reverted because he was a sockpuppet. Itcouldbepossible^Talk 02:30, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

Zero edits from that editor are made in good faith. They have been WP:BANNED from editing because of the number of socks they have created. They have made unsourced edits, edits with material not found in sources, edits with material contradicted by sources. They ignore the MOS and consensus and only follow their preferences. I will spend zero of my time reviewing edits from an editor that has wasted so much of so many others time. Ravensfire (talk) 02:35, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

But what about the edit that gave you. Do you think that it was made in bad faith? And something more I have to tell you. All edits made by 142.120.34.183 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) could actually be YAM lout socking again. So you might want to keep an eye on it. Itcouldbepossible^Talk 02:42, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

Given there's were several exaggerations in that exact edit, you want me to spend any of my time on an editor that doesn't give a damn about Wikipedia policies or anyone else but themself? Not a chance. If they were editing in good faith, they'd actually follow WP:STANDARDOFFER and yeah, that's been pointed out to them. YAM doesn't care about anyone but themself. The IP probably isn't YAM. They usually use templates for show start/end dates. There are a couple of ranges that I know YAM normally works out of - this was the most recent, but since it was blocked, they have been using accounts. Ravensfire (talk) 03:12, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

Need help

Is there any way to see "how many" people had seen my edits on Wikipedia?

If so, then please reply. Thank you. Bobe8q8661 (talk) 16:10, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

There really isn't a way to get that, sorry. Ravensfire (talk) 16:11, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

Please Suggest Draft about Sunny Prajapati https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Sunny_Prajapati

Please Suggest how it can afc ..

Thank regards Air Flik (talk) 05:18, 26 October 2022 (UTC)

PLEASE DO NOT EDIT UNKOWN THINGS

PLEASE DO NOT EDIT THINGS THAT YOU DONT KNOW UNDO YOUR CHANGES OF REMOVING INFOBOX IN ACTOR SHAFI — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wiki unofficial editors (talk • contribs) 14:05, 21 April 2022 (UTC)

@Wiki unofficial editors, when an infobox has unsourced information about a living person (WP:BLP), or the article intro is written more by a marketing team and full of WP:PUFFERY and WP:POV text, they will be removed. Also please read WP:OWN - nobody owns articles on Wikipedia, you cannot demand others stay away. Ravensfire (talk) 14:08, 21 April 2022 (UTC)

Warning

Hi hello don't delete information that you don't know I gathered all porjects of hombli films, And i follow their website and YouTube channels Announcement form every media i know all upcoming projects of hombli films, Don't delete the things you don't know. MNWiki84556 (talk) 06:14, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

@MNWiki84556 please don't add information without also adding a reliable source that supports that information. One of Wikipedia's core pillars is that readers can verify what was added. Information added without including a source is very likely to be removed. You are responsible for including the source when you add information. Ravensfire (talk) 13:13, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

There is no source in Google, what I edit it is thier youtube channel and instgram,instgram and twitter.the announced film Poster are source to me What can I do MNWiki84556 (talk) 20:40, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

@MNWiki84556, instagram and twitter posts are considered WP:PRIMARY, so they can be used as sources as long as it's basic information, about the author (meaning the company in this case) only. Youtube is more challenging as a source, see WP:YOUTUBE. If you haven't read the reliable source page I linked, it mentions this. Ravensfire (talk) 13:20, 5 May 2022 (UTC)

Revdel?

Hi. About the above revdel- do you want me to action it? Moneytrees🏝️(Talk) 03:48, 5 May 2022 (UTC)

@Moneytrees if you don't mind, please. I only speak English, but for someone to call out that a revdel is warranted, it must be pretty impolite language. Appreciate it! Ravensfire (talk) 03:58, 5 May 2022 (UTC)

Alright then, done 👍 Moneytrees🏝️(Talk) 04:03, 5 May 2022 (UTC)

Moneytrees, you're quick. Thanks, stay safe. C1K98V ^{(💬 ✒️ 📂)} 04:27, 5 May 2022 (UTC)

Rohitashv

Hi someone moved the Page Rohitash Gaud to this page. As I have no idea how page move request works can you look after this matter. Sid95Q (talk) 22:41, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

@Sid95Q, Wow, that's a lot of move activity that happened. I tried to move the page to Rohitash Gaud, but since it already exists (and I don't have the Page Mover user right), you'll need to go to WP:RM#TR and request the move there. This should be a non-controversial move as the WP:COMMONNAME appears to be Rohitash Gaud. He's credited with some of the other names, so there should be redirects from those spellings to that page. I would also note that the page was moved from that title by a now blocked sock puppet a few days ago. That should help reinforce this is a non-controversial move. Ravensfire (talk) 16:16, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

Message from Insaanhuok

Aap koi aur tag bhi laga sakte the par aapne meri saari mehnat bekaar kar di aur sabko direct draft mein bhej diya...jabki mere pages se bhut saare link connect ho gaye the kuch Wikipedia se bhi connect ho gaye the....and sources bhi reliable the lekin aisa laga jaise aapko draft mein daalna hi tha chahe ander kuch bhi ho..so thank you aapne itni mehnat ki now I'm leaving wiki

Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Insaanhuok (talk • contribs) 02:04, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

@Insaanhuok, please use English only to communicate with other editors here. Ravensfire (talk) 03:44, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

Would you consider becoming a New Page Reviewer?

Chart of the New Pages Patrol backlog for the past 6 months. () Hi Ravensfire, I've recently been looking for editors to invite to join the new page reviewing team, and after reviewing your editing history, I think you would be a good candidate. Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time but it requires a good understanding of Wikipedia policies and guidelines; the new page reviewing team needs help from experienced users like yourself. Would you please consider becoming a New Page Reviewer? Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision (if it looks daunting, don't worry, most pages are easy to review, and habits are quick to develop). If this looks like something that you can do, please consider joining us. If you choose to apply, you can drop an application over at WP:PERM/NPR. If you have questions, please feel free to drop a message on my talk page or at the reviewer's discussion board. Cheers, and hope to see you around, (t · c) buidhe 20:30, 27 May 2022 (UTC)

Moved pages to draft

Why you always moved pages to draf space. You or any other reviewer can suggest the improvement by adding the tag on page. But you directly move my pages to draft. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Insaanhuok (talk • contribs) 05:51, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

@Insaanhuok when you are creating very short articles with minimal information and not enough solid sources with significant coverage, moving the articles to draft is re right answer. Having a production section and a reception section (with sources!) would be ideal. Using scraper sites as sources doesn't help either. Ravensfire (talk) 11:59, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Ravensfire

Thank you for creating Kountry Luv.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 17:17, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

Moved pages to draft

This actress made her debut recently. So don't you think, we can't find much sources about her. still I try my best and use many source and information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Insaanhuok (talk • contribs) 21:58, June 5, 2022 (UTC)

@Insaanhuok: First, please remember to sign your talk page posts with ~~~~ at the end. Most visual editors will help with that. Second, new actresses rarely meet WP:NACTOR. Multiple significant roles are required or winning a notable award. Ravensfire (talk) 03:27, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

Review My Draft

Hey Ravensfire, hope you're doing good. The draft you said to add content and sources to, Draft:Khidmat Guzar, I have added plot and sufficient information required. Kindly, review the draft and suggest me an appropriate action. (talk) 10:24, 9 June 2022 (UTC)

@Lillyput4455 my apologies, I've managed to keep skipping over this despite intending to take a look. I'm planning on looking it over this evening. Ravensfire (talk) 18:21, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

@Lillyput4455 It's better than it was, but still not quite there. The sourcing still isn't the best. The hipinpakistan.com source is the best one, it actually focuses on the show. The rest are passing mentions in articles or basic landing pages. Sources that have significant coverage about the show (not just a mention of the show title) are needed. Professional reviews of the show, in depth coverage of the production. Ravensfire (talk) 16:54, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

Okay Thank you for your time @Ravensfire, I'll try to look for the sources relevant to the show then will let you know. Thank you! Lillyput4455 (talk) 20:38, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

Give better information is spam or not ?

Give reference to information provided to the people better understanding but some one say it's spam so how can I provide this information? Love958 (talk) 20:09, 9 June 2022 (UTC)

@Love958 The first issue is that the site is not a reliable source. It's a blog and probably scraping content from other sites. Second, you are quite likely connected to that site, meaning you need to read WP:PAID and make any required disclosures. Don't use Wikipedia to promote a site by spamming links, which is exactly what you were doing. It's not acceptable and can lead to you being blocked and/or the site put on the spam black list which will stop anyone from adding links to the site. Ravensfire (talk) 20:16, 9 June 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for your supporting and best reply but I can't promoting or advertising Love958 (talk) 20:53, 9 June 2022 (UTC)

Blocked

Please block these IP addresses. 139.193.54.228, 139.193.54.18, 139.193.49.205, 139.193.54.147, 139.193.44.148, 139.193.44.242, 139.193.44.187, 139.193.44.2 They are repeatedly adding same unsourced list of shows in various articles. 103.185.174.115 (talk) 04:44, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

The user you are requesting is not an administrator. Only administrators can block and unblock. If you are want the IPs to be blocked for vandalism, then you can report at WP:AIV. If it is for other issues, then you can report WP:ANI. Thanks. Itcouldbepossible ^Talk 05:05, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

Exactly as Itcouldbepossible said. I am not, not have any interest in becoming an admin here. The venues they suggested are the same I would have. Thank you. Ravensfire (talk) 05:20, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

hey i have updated article with related please give a check once

I have updated the article with relevant links please give a check its been 3 months since you rejected the article, thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Koundinyajayanth (talk • contribs) 09:20, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

@Koundinyajayanth I'm not a AFC reviewer, but I can give you some feedback on Draft:Saurabh Vaibhav. A big issue is that it's hard to tell if the article is talking about the pair, or just one of them. It switches from one to the other (They have ... He has...). Very confusing for the reader. WP:NMUSIC is the notability help for this area. They've composed songs for multiple films, that's a plus. They've been nominated for several significant awards, which is also a plus, but the article doesn't mention it much. It says they have won awards, but an album where they contributed one song among many really needs to be precisely spelled out (and sourced![19]). Minor awards generally aren't mentioned (if there's no article, it's generally considered minor).

The sources are iffy - Times of India is well known for paid news, and this is especially true around film/television. Interviews are generally not considered helpful for notability reasons. Lists on apple music, you tube and similar sites aren't really good sources for articles. Some really good advice is at WP:THREE - identify your top three sources, make sure they have significant coverage about the topic, not an interview and from a reputable news site (please, not TOI!).

I think they (I'm assuming this is about the duo) are notable, but that the article doesn't really show it yet. The phrasing especially needs to get fixed, it's extremely confusing to read right now. I'm doing some basic cleanup stuff, but hopefully you'll take this feedback and do the work needed to bring this article up to an easy accept for a reviewer. Ravensfire (talk) 01:01, 24 June 2022 (UTC)

yea will change the phrase and add the notable links, thanks a lot for your feedback it means a lot! Koundinyajayanth (talk) 12:17, 24 June 2022 (UTC)

New page reviewer granted

Hi Ravensfire. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group. Please check back at WP:PERM in case your user right is time limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the new page reviewer talk page. In addition, please remember:

• Be nice to new editors. They are usually not aware that they are doing anything wrong. Do make use of the message feature when tagging pages for maintenance so that they are aware.
• You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted. Please be formal and polite in your approach to them – even if they are not.
• If you are not sure what to do with a page, don't review it – just leave it for another reviewer.
• Accuracy is more important than speed. Take your time to patrol each page. Use the message feature to communicate with article creators and offer advice as much as possible.

The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. – Joe (talk) 09:58, 24 June 2022 (UTC)

New Page Patrol newsletter June 2022

New Page Review queue June 2022

Hello Ravensfire,

Backlog status

At the time of the last newsletter (No.27, May 2022), the backlog was approaching 16,000, having shot up rapidly from 6,000 over the prior two months. The attention the newsletter brought to the backlog sparked a flurry of activity. There was new discussion on process improvements, efforts to invite new editors to participate in NPP increased and more editors requested the NPP user right so they could help, and most importantly, the number of reviews picked up and the backlog decreased, dipping below 14,000 at the end of May.

Since then, the news has not been so good. The backlog is basically flat, hovering around 14,200. I wish I could report the number of reviews done and the number of new articles added to the queue. But the available statistics we have are woefully inadequate. The only real number we have is the net queue size.

In the last 30 days, the top 100 reviewers have all made more than 16 patrols (up from 8 last month), and about 70 have averaged one review a day (up from 50 last month).

While there are more people doing more reviews, many of the ~730 with the NPP right are doing little. Most of the reviews are being done by the top 50 or 100 reviewers. They need your help. We appreciate every review done, but please aim to do one a day (on average, or 30 a month).

Backlog drive

A backlog reduction drive, coordinated by buidhe and Zippybonzo, will be held from July 1 to July 31. Sign up here. Barnstars will be awarded.

TIP – New school articles

Many new articles on schools are being created by new users in developing and/or non-English-speaking countries. The authors are probably not even aware of Wikipedia's projects and policy pages. WP:WPSCH/AG has some excellent advice and resources specifically written for these users. Reviewers could consider providing such first-time article creators with a link to it while also mentioning that not all schools pass the GNG and that elementary schools are almost certainly not notable.

Misc

There is a new template available, {{NPP backlog}}, to show the current backlog. You can place it on your user or talk page as a reminder:

Very high unreviewed pages backlog: 12688 articles, as of 10:00, 4 May 2024 (UTC), according to DatBot

There has been significant discussion at WP:VPP recently on NPP-related matters (Draftification, Deletion, Notability, Verifiability, Burden). Proposals that would somewhat ease the burden on NPP aren't gaining much traction, although there are suggestions that the role of NPP be fundamentally changed to focus only on major CSD-type issues.

Reminders

• Consider staying informed on project issues by putting the project discussion page on your watchlist.
• If you have noticed a user with a good understanding of Wikipedia notability and deletion, suggest they help the effort by placing {{subst:NPR invite}} on their talk page.
• If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process and its software.
• To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

Notes

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:02, 24 June 2022 (UTC)

Muhammad Alauddin Siddiqui

You have made reverts on this page (Muhammad Alauddin Siddiqui) . Please change his birth year from 1936 to 1938 as you can see in most of the references their birth year is 1938. Please consider it. 119.73.114.110 (talk) 07:32, 28 June 2022 (UTC)

I've adding it in addition to the 1936 year as that's the general way to handle situations where sources differ. And WP:EVADE. Ravensfire (talk) 13:16, 28 June 2022 (UTC)

Alia Bhatt is not a British actress

Alia Bhatt is not a British actress. She is an Indian actress who predominantly works in Bollywood cinema. https://www.google.com/search?q=british+actresses&sxsrf=ALiCzsadDNvAoPVnqyHIpUTbQuc6Xr2ytQ%3A1656485830566&ei=xve7YsqSIsOF-Abk0b9Q&oq=&gs_lcp=Cgdnd3Mtd2l6EAEYADIHCCMQ6gIQJzIHCC4Q6gIQJzIHCC4Q6gIQJzIHCCMQ6gIQJzIHCCMQ6gIQJzIHCCMQ6gIQJzIHCCMQ6gIQJzIHCCMQ6gIQJzIHCC4Q6gIQJzIHCC4Q6gIQJ0oECEEYAEoECEYYAFAAWABgqA1oAXABeACAAQCIAQCSAQCYAQCgAQGwAQrAAQE&sclient=gws-wiz This is an example of British actresses So I would like to change the description which says she is a British actress with Indian descent. Alia Bhatt has a British citizenship but she is NOT a British actress, she is an Indian actress. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mickyds27 (talk • contribs) 07:20, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

@Mickyds27, the convention for Wikipedia articles is to use their citizenship for the description. Bhatt is a British actress who performs in India films. Please see WP:ETHNICITY. Ravensfire (talk) 12:10, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

Redirect of Murder of Kanhaiya Lal

Hi Ravensfire, you redirected a page on the Murder of Kanhaiya Lal. However, this was discussed here and a consensus was arrived at to keep the page separate. As such, could you please create consensus before the action? The page was not for the subject (so WP:BLP1E doesn't apply). It was for the act. See Samuel Paty. -- Webberbrad007 (talk) 07:32, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

@Webberbrad007 my apologies, the page came up under new page patrol without me realizing there was a discussion, hence my WP:BOLD redirect. I'll be interested to see how this evolves and if it warrants a standalone article in a months time. Ravensfire (talk) 12:01, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

Ahad Raza Mir's LSA win

Raven, if I provide you better references will you rewrite the Ahad Raza Mir's LSA win section?? I am sick of writing the same thing again and again, followed by your deletions. Here is the reference: https://www.somethinghaute.com/ahad-raza-mir-is-like-my-son-says-naumaan-ijaz/ Muhammad Ahmad SM (talk) 18:42, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

@Muhammad Ahmad SM, having other editors change or remove material you've added is a normal part of Wikipedia. Couple of things to note - first, sources are absolutely needed for something like this, and you started without sources at all. Sources need to support everything in the edit, and some of what you've added hasn't been in the sources. Finally, I think most of what you've added is more appropriate in the specific award show. Snubs are a normal part of any award, as is complaining about them. If it's not widespread and actually involves some critical analysis and commentary, it's questionable to include it here.

Specific to the change you requested, the source you gave is not that good. It's one person venting, and that's it. Most of what you had added in the last version isn't supported by the source, that's called original research. The source far below the level needed for something like this. I am probably going to start moving some of this to the show specific articles, and look at what would be relevant to stay in the main article. I think something short about the #MeToo impact on the 18th LSA is relevant as it seems to have had widespread impact and notice. I'm not sure about the rest staying in the main article, but I plan on moving the information to the show specific article. Ravensfire (talk) 20:00, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

My article is about an award wining women entrepreneur

Hello , You set my article Nasima Akter Nisha for deletion but its about an famous entrepreneur & she got Anannya Top Ten Awards award for her entrepreneurship .I will request to re-check it and then remove the tag as its about a notable person Marjianitu (talk) 04:22, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

@Marjianitu, please double-check Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Nasima_Akter_Nisha, I was not the one that nominated the article for deletion. My only edit to the article was to remove a WP:MIRROR of Wikipedia you were using as a source. Please allow the AFD discussion to run it's course, you're welcome to leave a comment there noting that you've edited the article after the AFD started and provide reasons the article should be kept. Ravensfire (talk) 13:38, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

Understood. But now it shows that its under deletation discussion or something.You may set up this tag ? Marjianitu (talk) 04:26, 2 July 2022 (UTC)

Take a look at the article page history, that will tell you who felt the article should be deleted. My suggestion to you is not to worry about that, but to read Help:My article got nominated for deletion!, and understand the types of points you need to make. Articles on Wikipedia need to show that the subject is notable. Okay, she's won an award, is the award notable (meaning, does it have an article)? That's something to bring up. WP:THREE is a good help article to read as well. Identify the best three sources for the article - from reliable sources (think major news sites, NOT press-releases, blogs, publicity, etc), independent of the subject (not interviews) and have significant coverage. You need to make those points at the AFD or the article will probably be deleted. You could also ask for the article to be moved to draft space and work on it there until it's accepted by a reviewer. Ravensfire (talk) 04:32, 2 July 2022 (UTC)

Yes the award she got have an article . Nasima Akter Nisha got Anannya Top Ten Awards 2019 as an entrepreneur . Marjianitu (talk) 04:18, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

NPP July 2022 backlog drive is on!

New Page Patrol | July 2022 Backlog Drive
On 1 July, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Redirect patrolling is not part of the drive. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

(t · c) buidhe 20:26, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

Merger Proposal at Naagin (2015 TV series)

I have suggested a Merger Proposal to merge Naagin 6 with Naagin (2015 TV series) . I pinged you to give your honest opinion. Please give your opinion here. [20] Pri2000 (talk) 11:11, 13 July 2022 (UTC)

Requested move

I have suggested a move request for Naagin (2015 TV series) . Please give your opinion here [21] Pri2000 (talk) 10:12, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

Dil Awaiz (2022 TV series) & Aik Sitam Aur

Both of these articles which were moved to draftspace sometimes ago, has now again moved to mainspace without adding reliable citataions from independent sources while the both has just a single source of Dawn (newspaper) and Aik Sitam Aur has another source of Daily Times (Pakistan) which is actually false and doest belong to this article.39.34.170.60 (talk) 10:08, 16 July 2022 (UTC)

I always find it humorous when serial sock user who shows zero regard for Wikipedia, whose articles still have some unsourced material from time to time and more frequently a promotional tone, complains about another editor doing exactly what they've done. Ravensfire (talk) 13:19, 16 July 2022 (UTC)

Warning ⚠️from India Predator The Butcher of Delhi

Hi there! Could you please tell me and educate me why the hell you put the article Indian Predator: The Butcher of Delhi to redirect and also for deletion? Point me the valid reason why the hell you put that article to redirect and deletion? Firstly, the article has no issues on the field of content, citations, title, and even it has fulfilled basic Wikipedia guidelines. Tell me what is the reason behind all this! Fucker!!! Morgankarki (talk) 16:01, 21 July 2022 (UTC)

@Morgankarki Stop the Personal attacks, it's petty, childish and I certainly won't interact with someone that insults others. You're welcome to discuss with me after you've calmed down and retracted (use strikethrough) the crap in your above message. Also, read the message I left before again, it tells you exactly why. Ravensfire (talk) 16:12, 21 July 2022 (UTC)

Ok fine!! But It need to be reviewed as soon as possible and kept the article in Mainspace. And kindly mention the reason in the article talk page so that other users who are unknown on this find it. Morgankarki (talk) 16:17, 21 July 2022 (UTC)

Please strikethrough the insults in your initial message, and you really should do the same in the other places you left the same post. Ravensfire (talk) 16:26, 21 July 2022 (UTC)

First see the topic My Reply to you Morgankarki (talk) 16:30, 21 July 2022 (UTC)

I've seen it. Yes, you did mean to disrespect - the tone of your message is abundantly clear on that. You still haven't retracted it, and you've left it on two user talk pages and the article talk page. Tell me, if I'd left a message with that tone on your page, how likely would you be to work with me? Especially when I've left it up after you requested I retract / redact parts of the message?

So that's my venting done. What you've added is probably enough for a pretty easy DRV overturn. There's some formatting issues and the review section needs some copyediting and better summary of the sources. It looks like you copy and pasted sentences in several places, especially the lead which is a problem. You need to summarize sources and rewrite, completely in your own words, what's in those sources. "notorious serial killer Chandrakant Jha who ruthlessly dismembered his victims and scattered their body parts around the city of Delhi" is from here. Several other places you've got very lurid phrasing is most likely copy-paste and it's also not in an appropriate tone for an encyclopedia article. Ravensfire (talk) 16:44, 21 July 2022 (UTC)

I've removed your inappropriate post from the article talk page, and a user removed your post from their talk page. There's still one on your talk page that would be good for you to remove. I've given up hope you'll redact your inappropriate comments from the post here. Wikipedia is a collaborative environment. You WILL deal with other editors removing or changing your edits. You must learn to assume good faith and work with other editors. This can't happen when you start with hostility. I'm glad you have started discussing this in a calmer manner. I'm going to be copying my second para above to the article talk page where further discussions about the article belong. Ravensfire (talk) 16:55, 21 July 2022 (UTC)

My Reply to You ⚠️

Hey! I don't mean to disrespect but the article really don't need any redirect and nominating for deletion process. Kindly review the article as fast as possible and allow it to move from draft to mainspace on the particular date with the message on my talk page. I need to know where this article has the issue?! Morgankarki (talk) 16:21, 21 July 2022 (UTC)

Indian Predator

Can I work on this User:Ravensfire/sandbox/Indian Predator: The Butcher of Delhi Morgankarki (talk) 01:57, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

Of course! Ravensfire (talk) 13:32, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

What Next for Indian Predator article???

Ravensfire, me and some other users had edited this article on the Ravensfire user sandbox and done enough maintenance required for it and the content (Plagiarism) like was removed from the inappropriate headings and section used over there. Citations which are unauthentic was removed. Link had been fixed. So to all the top users over there, what is the remaining things that is still required to publish this article to Mainspace. Please do mention on this topic!!! Morgankarki (talk) 03:38, 23 July 2022 (UTC)

Nalina's at it again.

Hello, Ravensfire! I recently warned Nalina about some edits she recently made. First off I would like to thank you for not leaving this unhandled, but taking the time out of your day to cleanup the mess. This is probably her third-last warning before I request a block, but she's making edits that have been problematic in almost every way. Due to that, I am not sure which administrator board to request a block for her. Seeing you are the more experienced editor, is it possible if I can leave a message on your talk page again, and you can request a block for her on an administrator board, and once again, thanks for your hard work and efforts! Sincerely, Dinoz1 (chat?) 15:34, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

@Dinoz1 I'll take a look, thank you. Ravensfire (talk) 20:23, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

Sounds good, thanks once again! Dinoz1 (chat?) 16:53, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

TMKOC

What's the problem sir. Anupamaa, Ye hai chahatein, CID, Wagle Ki Duniya, etc. Shows has story arcs. Why can't you let TMKOC page keep story arc/Episode section. It tells the story simply and help user know about the episodes. . If there is any rules CHANGE IT. it pisses off actually. What's big deal if tmkoc had story arc section. What's the problem. It will definitely help. .. I request you to add story arc section. Thank you ☺️ 106.207.253.147 (talk) 12:16, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

Please discuss and get consensus on the article talk page. You've been reverted by several people and you keep trying to force it in the article. That's not helpful. Ravensfire (talk) 14:50, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

Talk:Kundali_Bhagya

Hi, i have updated the broken link you can check this link is no longer exits https://www.zee5.com/zee5news/kundali-bhagya-08-february-2022-written-update-monas-plan-to-worsen-maheshs-condition Waqasdesi (talk) 03:31, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

@Waqasdesi, seriously, stop spamming your site. This wasn't your first account promoting that site. I will ask for it to be blacklisted if there are anymore additions. Dead links can usually be recovered through archive.org - [22]. NO MORE SPAM. Ravensfire (talk) 03:36, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

yes im trying to get a backlink from wikipedia, can you tell me a legal way of doing that? Waqasdesi (talk) 04:33, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

@Waqasdesi bluntly, it won't happen. it's not a reliable source, and using Wikipedia to try to promote your site is absolutely not the purpose of Wikipedia. Further additions of the site will result in a blacklist request. Ravensfire (talk) 04:45, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

Also, all links on Wikipedia are set as no-follow, so there isn't any page rank advantage. Ravensfire (talk) 04:55, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

@Waqasdesi and just noticed that your prior account Waqasdurani (talk · contribs) was globally locked from spamming. Now you're in WP:EVADE territory after creating a new account to get around a block. Don't go down that road. You need to get your original account unblocked, which is not going to be simple as it's a global block. Add in you continuing to spam with this new account, and you've put yourself in a very difficult place. Ravensfire (talk) 14:53, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

New Page Patrol newsletter August 2022

New Page Review queue August 2022

Hello Ravensfire,

Backlog status

After the last newsletter (No.28, June 2022), the backlog declined another 1,000 to 13,000 in the last week of June. Then the July backlog drive began, during which 9,900 articles were reviewed and the backlog fell by 4,500 to just under 8,500 (these numbers illustrate how many new articles regularly flow into the queue). Thanks go to the coordinators Buidhe and Zippybonzo, as well as all the nearly 100 participants. Congratulations to Dr vulpes who led with 880 points. See this page for further details.

Unfortunately, most of the decline happened in the first half of the month, and the backlog has already risen to 9,600. Understandably, it seems many backlog drive participants are taking a break from reviewing and unfortunately, we are not even keeping up with the inflow let alone driving it lower. We need the other 600 reviewers to do more! Please try to do at least one a day.

Coordination

MB and Novem Linguae have taken on some of the coordination tasks. Please let them know if you are interested in helping out. MPGuy2824 will be handling recognition, and will be retroactively awarding the annual barnstars that have not been issued for a few years.

Open letter to the WMF

The Page Curation software needs urgent attention. There are dozens of bug fixes and enhancements that are stalled (listed at Suggested improvements). We have written a letter to be sent to the WMF and we encourage as many patrollers as possible to sign it here. We are also in negotiation with the Board of Trustees to press for assistance. Better software will make the active reviewers we have more productive.

TIP - Reviewing by subject

Reviewers who prefer to patrol new pages by their most familiar subjects can do so from the regularly updated sorted topic list.

New reviewers

The NPP School is being underused. The learning curve for NPP is quite steep, but a detailed and easy-to-read tutorial exists, and the Curation Tool's many features are fully described and illustrated on the updated page here.

Reminders

• Consider staying informed on project issues by putting the project discussion page on your watchlist.
• If you have noticed a user with a good understanding of Wikipedia notability and deletion, suggest they help the effort by placing {{subst:NPR invite}} on their talk page.
• If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process and its software.
• To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:24, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

Jhalak Dikhhla Jaa (season 10)

Hello @Ravensfire I hope you're doing well. Can you look at my article creation, if it's eligible for page triage would you consider marking it. I know it's not advice to ask for review due to backlog. Please suggest me improvement as well. Thanks for your consideration. C1K98V ^{(💬 ✒️ 📂)} 14:12, 15 August 2022 (UTC)

@C1K98V, No worries. I've marked it as reviewed. Cast members are sourced, there's a fair amount of information about the show (that's sourced). The release section is a bit weak with it being mainly routine marketing fluff without any context. MOS:FILMMARKETING talks about this, but that's film specific and the Television MOS is silent, so I've given up pushing hard on things like this. Article is a solid start. Ravensfire (talk) 18:57, 22 August 2022 (UTC)

@Ravensfire yeah I myself was a bit doubtful with the release section, but that's how I have been creating it or I'm used to now. I will look into other articles to learn about the release section more. I will go through the above mos as well. Thanks alot for quick assistance. C1K98V ^{(💬 ✒️ 📂)} 00:07, 23 August 2022 (UTC)

NPP message

Hi Ravensfire,

Invitation

For those who may have missed it in our last newsletter, here's a quick reminder to see the letter we have drafted, and if you support it, do please go ahead and sign it. If you already signed, thanks. Also, if you haven't noticed, the backlog has been trending up lately; all reviews are greatly appreciated.

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:11, 20 August 2022 (UTC)

September 2022 Jenish Talaviya

Dear,

Thank you for you review but I am not receiving any compensation. I am Only Adding Information of the people related to Indian Cinema Maily Focusing of Gujarati Cinema as there are not many articles of Persons related to Gujarati Cinema. I am only creating articles to show people their contribution to the Gujarati Cinema. Jenishtalaviya (talk) 04:01, 22 September 2022 (UTC)

October 2022 New Pages Patrol backlog drive

New Page Patrol | October 2022 backlog drive
On 1 October, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled and for maintaining a streak throughout the drive. Barnstars will also be awarded for re-reviewing articles. Redirect patrolling is not part of the drive. Sign up here!
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

(t · c) buidhe 21:17, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

Wikipedia for the Actor Walid Riachy in Kurup (film)

Hello, i was reading kurup (film) https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kurup_(film)

& i saw your last edits, im a director & honestly a big fan of Walid Riachy a main actor in the movie & when i was reading i noticed that his name isn’t highlighted in the cast section, wanted to go to his wikipedia but couldn’t find one, wanted to read more about him to get in touch with him for a movie.

Im just highlighting that because he is a notable actor on the big screen in Mollywood Cinema & Hollywood & would be nice having all info about him in Wikipedia & i thought maybe i should get in touch with someone who edited the article. Wish you a nice day Denisbock (talk) 03:21, 4 October 2022 (UTC)

Reference Removals

I will be careful next time and will definitely avoid removing references. Muhammad Ahmad SM (talk) 03:46, 4 October 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Cringe pop for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cringe pop is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cringe pop until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Python Drink (talk) 23:36, 6 October 2022 (UTC)

Discussion at Talk:Gurmeet Ram Rahim Singh § Removal of the recently added section- Allegations of conspiracy behind conviction

 You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Gurmeet Ram Rahim Singh § Removal of the recently added section- Allegations of conspiracy behind conviction. NotSOnovice (talk) 18:23, 7 October 2022 (UTC)

3rd PMAs

I have searched all over the internet and I have been unable to find valid sources of winners for 3rd Pakistan Media Awards. Can you please help me out by providing them?? Muhammad Ahmad SM (talk) 11:51, 12 October 2022 (UTC)

To start, please don't use forum posts as sources (see [23] for example). They are NOT RS|reliable sources. If you can't find any valid sources, it shouldn't be included. You're in a far better spot than I am to find Pakistani sources, to be honest. Ravensfire (talk) 19:40, 12 October 2022 (UTC)

October 2022

Hello. This is to let you know that one of your recent contributions of a page article being moved to draft space has been reverted as a matter of fact it being supported with many reliable sources. Do familiarise yourself with WP:INSPECTOR. Simply moving a article to draft space for small reasons about having proper citations could be done using a template instead. Your actions can be discouraging to people who genuinely are trying to build content on Wikipedia. Thanks  Rejoy2003  05:26, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

Fortunately, @Rejoy2003, you've created enough articles to have known to create something with large unsourced sections in draft space from the start, so this was a courtesy move for you intended to help Wikipedia as a whole. Do read WP:AGF, and note that leaving retaliatory, bad faith warnings like this is disruptive and portrays you in a rather poor light. Ravensfire (talk) 14:35, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

New Page Patrol newsletter October 2022

Hello Ravensfire,

Much has happened since the last newsletter over two months ago. The open letter finished with 444 signatures. The letter was sent to several dozen people at the WMF, and we have heard that it is being discussed but there has been no official reply. A related article appears in the current issue of The Signpost. If you haven't seen it, you should, including the readers' comment section.

Awards: Barnstars were given for the past several years (thanks to MPGuy2824), and we are now all caught up. The 2021 cup went to John B123 for leading with 26,525 article reviews during 2021. To encourage moderate activity, a new "Iron" level barnstar is awarded annually for reviewing 360 articles ("one-a-day"), and 100 reviews earns the "Standard" NPP barnstar. About 90 reviewers received barnstars for each of the years 2018 to 2021 (including the new awards that were given retroactively). All awards issued for every year are listed on the Awards page. Check out the new Hall of Fame also.

Software news: Novem Linguae and MPGuy2824 have connected with WMF developers who can review and approve patches, so they have been able to fix some bugs, and make other improvements to the Page Curation software. You can see everything that has been fixed recently here. The reviewer report has also been improved.

NPP backlog May – October 15, 2022

Suggestions:

• There is much enthusiasm over the low backlog, but remember that the "quality and depth of patrolling are more important than speed".
• Reminder: an article should not be tagged for any kind of deletion for a minimum of 15 minutes after creation and it is often appropriate to wait an hour or more. (from the NPP tutorial)
• Reviewers should focus their effort where it can do the most good, reviewing articles. Other clean-up tasks that don't require advanced permissions can be left to other editors that routinely improve articles in these ways (creating Talk Pages, specifying projects and ratings, adding categories, etc.) Let's rely on others when it makes the most sense. On the other hand, if you enjoy doing these tasks while reviewing and it keeps you engaged with NPP (or are guiding a newcomer), then by all means continue.
• This user script puts a link to the feed in your top toolbar.

Backlog:

Saving the best for last: From a July low of 8,500, the backlog climbed back to 11,000 in August and then reversed in September dropping to below 6,000 and continued falling with the October backlog drive to under 1,000, a level not seen in over four years. Keep in mind that there are 2,000 new articles every week, so the number of reviews is far higher than the backlog reduction. To keep the backlog under a thousand, we have to keep reviewing at about half the recent rate!

Reminders

• Newsletter feedback - please take this short poll about the newsletter.
• If you're interested in instant messaging and chat rooms, please join us on the New Page Patrol Discord, where you can ask for help and live chat with other patrollers.
• Please add the project discussion page to your watchlist.
• If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be a reviewer, please ask any admin to remove you from the group. If you want the tools back again, just ask at PERM.
• To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

Nevel Gracias

Hey. I reviewed this one as there now appear to be sufficient citations to prove notability. I saw the running battle you were having with the article and its author, so just thought I'd ping you and let you know! Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 07:16, 19 October 2022 (UTC)

@Alexandermcnabb, thanks for the heads up! It's definitely better than it was. There's still some puffery language in there, but dealing with the creator is, umm, challenging and I just don't feel up to wasting time in another edit-war over something obvious but they have to be forced to the talk page to discuss. (And sorry for the late reply, out on the Blue Ridge Parkway for the past week - nature triumphs over Wikipedia!) Ravensfire (talk) 13:54, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

Chill in natural beauty/wrangle with obdurate random. It's a no-brainer, no? :) Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 15:41, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

Impersonator?

Just wanted to double-check...is

• Ravensfire original (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

you? DMacks (talk) 08:06, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

@DMacks, nope, that's not me. It's probably the latest Eswaran Naveen sock. Ravensfire (talk) 13:47, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

I hard-blocked and reverted all their edits. No time to do more Wiki work today, so feel free to add a note to the SPI. DMacks (talk) 14:14, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

Will do, and thank you! Ravensfire (talk) 14:35, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

MV Brigitte Bardot

My edit was both true and constructive in the light of the last events with SSCSUS and it's FOUNDER Paul Watson being kicked out and the new BOD changing from direct action to being GREEDPEACE V.2.0, Paul Watson was against the sale from the beginning and on top of that the boat had just been refitted with new engines and navigational equipment (all done via donations from supporters of SSCS), the new BOD has sold or scrapped 4 vessels so they could by a high end luxury boat (party boat) with no real purpose of campaigns other than providing living space for the brass and friends 95.223.44.231 (talk) 13:30, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

It represents your view only though. Great for a blog, not great for a Wikipedia article. Your edits were reverted because they were disruptive and made unsupported and unsourced accusations against a living person. Please don't make them again. Ravensfire (talk) 13:45, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

A cheeseburger!

Dinoz1 (chat?) haz givn u Cheezburgr! Cheezburgrs promot WikiLovez and hoapfuly thiz one haz made yore day bettr. Spreadd teh WikiLovez by givin sumone else Cheezburgr, whethr it be sumeone youz hav had disagreementz with in teh past or a gud frend. Hapy munchins!

Spredd teh goudnesz of Cheezburgerz to all lolcat buddiez by addin {{subst:Cheezburgr}} to their talk paj with friendly messuj to all.

Dinoz1 (chat?) 16:36, 27 October 2022 (UTC)

Hera Pheri logo

Editor directed to use the article talk page
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
@Ravensfire i think that logo is real, you nees to see official posters of both films. Can't you see?? maybe you will get my point. don't know why you think it's fan made or whatever else. Themodifie7 (talk) 13:08, 28 October 2022 (UTC) @Themodifie7 Use. The. Article. Talk. Page. Ravensfire (talk) 13:10, 28 October 2022 (UTC) I am talking about Hera Pheri (film series). Themodifie7 (talk) 13:13, 28 October 2022 (UTC) @Themodifie7 Use. The. Article. Talk. Page. Not. My. Talk. Page. This is a content dispute. Use the article talk page for those. Sheesh, how many times do I have to point to there? Ravensfire (talk) 13:14, 28 October 2022 (UTC)

Keep an eye

Hi, please keep an eye on User:Jerry369, a pro-Mammootty and anti-Mohanlal editor. Please review the edits, articles, and references if you get time. Thank you. 2409:4073:2019:9020:F062:9A21:EE17:903E (talk) 18:40, 29 October 2022 (UTC)

MTV Splitsvilla 11

⚠️ Do not remove information like you have been doing. The information given are ghe actual ones. So you aren't meant to be removing them continuously...! Ems 27 03 (talk) 14:53, 30 October 2022 (UTC)

Discuss on the article talk page. You have been reverted multiple times by multiple editors over this. You will end up blocked if you continue this. Read WP:BRD and follow that process. Hint - D means discuss, on the article talk page. Do NOT keep pushing fancruft. Ravensfire (talk) 14:55, 30 October 2022 (UTC)

Why am I being reverted like these? Ems 27 03 (talk) 14:25, 31 October 2022 (UTC)

Get consensus on the article talk page. Ravensfire (talk) 14:30, 31 October 2022 (UTC)

Possible block evasion

Looks like Nalina.E.Nalina has returned again on a different account. I've filed a report at WP:SPI to get the possible sockpuppet blocked. Just letting you know. Thanks, Dinoz1 (chat?) 15:08, 31 October 2022 (UTC)

@Dinoz1 and now confirmed as a sock. That's just sad to see - obviously someone with some passion for editing, but the same issues over and over. Perfection is never a requirement, but there needs to be improvement, and it's just not there. Very disappointing. Ravensfire (talk) 16:16, 31 October 2022 (UTC)

MTV Splitsvilla 14

Have been noticing that you are removing the contestants' list in Splitsvilla 14. You're being requested and told not to do that thing again. Watch splitsvilla on 12 Nov; if you think of removing after watching, you may. But DO NOT DO that before that. Ems 27 03 (talk) 14:41, 10 November 2022 (UTC)

@Ems 27 03, you have been requested and told you CANNOT continue to add information without a source. DO NOT DO THAT AGAIN. You WILL be reported and asked to be blocked. Read WP:V and Reliable Sources for help understanding the reasons. Seriously, you need to stop with the unsourced editing and ignoring those concerns and just edit-warring to push your version. Ravensfire (talk) 14:43, 10 November 2022 (UTC)

Okay, you reverted again, you've been reported to WP:AIV. Ravensfire (talk) 14:45, 10 November 2022 (UTC)

AFC review

Hello Ravensfire, Hope you're doing well. Can you please consider reviewing the Draft:Kaveri Priyam, and sharing improvement as well. Thanks, stay safe. C1K98V ^{(💬 ✒️ 📂)} 01:17, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

@C1K98V, apologies, I've only done a quick glance through, but it's far better than it was at the last decline. The main hurdle as always is showing the multiple significant roles. Reviews of the show as a whole (not just one episode) that call out her performance (even critical views) can really help for that. I think after Dil Diyaan Gallaan is broadcast, that will be easier to demonstrate. Ravensfire (talk) 04:35, 23 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Sock back removing huge content and fact with sources

Seems like Sock Eswaran Naveen [24] as Sensris [25] removing huge content and fact with sources. Nehansaxan (talk) 16:41, 30 November 2022 (UTC)

@Nehansaxan, This is probably a sock, but it's not likely to be EN. A CU check was performed a few weeks ago that likely would have at least triggered a closer look. I can see the similar edits though, that is interesting. With the volume of their edits over 5+ months, there have been multiple CU checks on EN socks. That said, what they are removing is, in part, just name-dropping. When a secondary sources critically comments on pairings (good or bad), that can be notable, but just mentioning names is puffery. I've done some cleanup in that section, but really Sensris's edits were mostly in good faith. Using edit-summaries would have been helpful to explain their edits. Ravensfire (talk) 18:26, 30 November 2022 (UTC)

For sure this is Sock of Eswaran Naveen returned as as Praanchi prroooti. [26] Removed the whole important content and fact with sources Nehansaxan (talk) 19:25, 2 December 2022 (UTC)

I've already reported them at WP:SPI. Ravensfire (talk) 19:25, 2 December 2022 (UTC)

The same sock returned as Simran Bagga Rishi [27] Nehansaxan (talk) 11:35, 4 December 2022 (UTC)

Next time, please consider just filing the SPI report. Ravensfire (talk) 03:28, 5 December 2022 (UTC)

Adding notability template again to Sanjeev Tyagi Article.

Hii @Ravensfire, There are many articles on the internet which are independent of the subject and few are listed below:

https://www.tribuneindia.com/news/lifestyle/sanjeev-tyagi-returns-on-tv-with-crime-patrol-2-0-407601

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/tv/news/hindi/its-not-only-the-costume-but-also-the-character-that-should-be-visible-says-sanjeev-tyaagi-tvs-favourite-cop/articleshow/77487142.cms

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/tv/news/hindi/sanjeev-tyagi-returns-to-crime-patrol-2-0/articleshow/91794092.cms

https://www.tellychakkar.com/tv/tv-news/crime-patrol-fame-sanjeev-tyagi-joins-shashi-sumeet-s-upcoming-web-series-surang-211112

https://www.tellychakkar.com/digital/exclusive-crime-patrol-fame-sanjeev-tyagi-and-patakhaa-fame-abhishek-duhan-join-ruslaan

https://www.tellychakkar.com/tv/tv-news/sony-entertainment-television-s-crime-patrol-completes-1000-episodes-190320

https://www.jansatta.com/photos/picture-gallery/crime-patrol-fame-sanjeev-tyagi-wiki-bio-age-family-marriage-fees-know-about-sony-tv-crime-show-inspector-real-life/1586787/

and there are many articles on the internet involving accouncement or promotion of the project where his name is written. Some of them also are in the references to his work in the article.

Columbidae5 (talk) 16:29, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

Believe it or not, I've reviewed the sources. It's still questionable, and with the AFD not all that along ago, your move was not ideal. Please continue this on the article talk page. Ravensfire (talk) 16:41, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

Also, TellyChakkar is generally not considered a reliable source, see WikiProject Film/Indian cinema task force#Not reliable. Ravensfire (talk) 19:52, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

About Hirani's introduction

when sources is added then why to remove? Themodifie7 (talk) 18:06, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

Replied on article talk page, also started a section on improving the lead. Ravensfire (talk) 19:24, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

Sock of Eswaran Naveen

Sock of Eswaran Naveen returned as as Mrishtika removing content, awards and fact with sources at: Cinema Express Award For Best Actress [28]

Rajeswari Kalyanam [29]

Nandi Award for Best Actress [30]

Filmfare Award for Best Female Debut [31]

Talk inappropriately in my Talk page. Please help me to open SPI report. I'm not quiet familiar with this. Nehansaxan (talk) 08:42, 17 December 2022 (UTC)

@Nehansaxan: (TALK PAGE STALKER) I recommend you read the first few paragraphs at WP:SPI, including the part "How to open a sockpuppet investigation". Dinoz1 (chat?) 12:39, 21 December 2022 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/Ak131001

Hello Ravensfire, the Zimi09 CCI was just reopened and renamed with some socks included, just notifying you since I've seen you've already reverted and cleaned some of the edits listed there. Moneytrees🏝️(Talk) 04:12, 22 December 2022 (UTC)

@Moneytrees, sigh. I would like to think that this editor would have learned from the last time, but quite obviously they haven't. Thank you for the notice, I'll try to help over the next couple of days. I should have connected the dots on this one. Ravensfire (talk) 14:08, 22 December 2022 (UTC)

I finished the remaining stuff, it wasn't too bad-- almost everything significant had been taken care of by you and others. Thank you for dealing with this sockmaster. Moneytrees🏝️(Talk) 22:33, 24 December 2022 (UTC)

@Moneytrees that's good to hear! I've been thinking on Mohiuddin Trust - it's a redirect, but the full history is still present. Of course, there are some issues in what they created. Even in some of the early versions before other started pushing it as a redirect [32], the Earthquake paragraph is a direct copy of the opening paragraph of the source [33]. It might be easier to just delete the article as a G5 since the only substantial edits are from AK131001 socks, then recreate it as a redirect and protect it to stop them from doing anything further with it. If a neutral editor wants to create it later, draft space is a viable option. Hope the holidays are treating you and your family well! Ravensfire (talk) 17:57, 29 December 2022 (UTC)

 Done. My holiday has been nice so far; the annual Christmas dinner turkey caught fire, but it still ended up pretty good! Moneytrees🏝️(Talk) 03:30, 31 December 2022 (UTC)

Happy Holidays!

Hello Ravensfire: Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, Dinoz1 (chat?) 13:19, 22 December 2022 (UTC)

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings}} to send this message

Dinoz1 (chat?) 13:19, 22 December 2022 (UTC)

@Dinoz1 - Thank you and cheers for the message! I hope you and and your family enjoy the season as well. Ravensfire (talk) 13:58, 22 December 2022 (UTC)