User talk:Rbworld528

This is Rbworld528's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rudybundini (July 25)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SkyGazer 512 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

For Wikipedia articles, what primarily establishes verifiability and notability for subjects is sources, preferably multiple reliable secondary sources, which the article currently lacks.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rudybundini and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Rudybundini, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SkyGazer 512 ^{Oh no, what did I do this time?} 17:53, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Rbworld528! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! SkyGazer 512 ^{Oh no, what did I do this time?} 17:53, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Editing with a conflict of interest[edit]

Hello, Rbworld528. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Largoplazo (talk) 01:14, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Rudy Bundini[edit]

The article Rudy Bundini has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable, fails WP:GNG and WP:BIO, a number of photo spreads that haven't generated any actual coverage.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Largoplazo (talk) 01:21, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Largoplazo, I am new to this wikipedia. I just provided the references that he is real and can be contacted. I don't have any conflict of interest or connection with Rudy Bundini. I live pretty far away from him and don't really know him personally but I admire and follow his work. I follow his career and he has significant major of achievements, his followers now is around 408,000 and I believe soon he can reach 1 million followers so he is pretty big influence in Fashion Industry and also a public figure. I asked him the permission to use his images and I've got his written permission through email and I just forwarded the permission to the permissions-en@wikimedia.org and I got the ticket number 2018091810000471. I hope this will clarify the doubt. Please let me know if you have questions. Thanks and Regards, Rbworld528 (talk) 02:06, 18 September 2018 (UTC)rbworld528[reply]

September 2018[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Wikipedia. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Largoplazo (talk) 11:44, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rudy Bundini for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rudy Bundini is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rudy Bundini until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Largoplazo (talk) 11:45, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

How to have a discussion[edit]

Hi. Please stop sticking your responses in the middle of my contributions. It ruins the ability of anybody to follow the discussion and distinguish different people's contributions. I am about to clean up your additions to the deletion discussion for the second time. Largoplazo (talk) 18:52, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Mr Largoplazo, I could have the right for contribution and responses. So I just responded with the facts. You are trying to removed my hard work, my research and someone who I believe should be recognized. Thanks for your time. Regards, --Rbworld528 (talk) 21:07, 18 September 2018 (UTC)RBworld528[reply]

What does that have to do with sticking your responses in the middle of what I wrote? Largoplazo (talk) 21:10, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry that if you think I am sticking in the middle. I tried to responses for each subject. I really did my homework, so I want you to understand my point of view. Regards, --Rbworld528 (talk) 21:17, 18 September 2018 (UTC)Rbworld528[reply]

That's fine, and there's nothing wrong with what you chose to communicate. It's just that when someone types five paragraphs, with one signature at the end, and you put responses right in the middle of it, there's no longer any way for anyone to tell who's written what and follow the conversation. Largoplazo (talk) 21:22, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2018[edit]

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Rudy Bundini, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Largoplazo (talk) 18:58, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Besides again restoring the maintenance tags that you removed while the problems they flag remain unresolved, you again added a bunch of improper external links to the article, partly because you continue to confuse WP:References with WP:External links, and you again violated WP:EL and WP:ELMINOFFICIAL. Please acquaint yourself with Wikipedia's guidelines on these things before restoring once more inappropriate material. You are attempting to use this website as a portal to all of Rudy Bundini's content around the web. This is not what Wikipedia is for. Largoplazo (talk) 19:00, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I just undid additions of yours one more time. Please understand that your passion for your subject doesn't override the nature of Wikipedia. All articles have to conform to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, regardless of how passionate their creators are about their subject or how much recognition they think their subjects deserve. If you haven't read the relevant ones yet (the ones I keep giving you links to), you ought to. Largoplazo (talk) 21:13, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:24, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It is clear from your edit history that your sole purpose in creating this account (which I assume stands for "Rudy Bundini World") is to promote Rudy Bundini contrary to Wikipedia's policies regarding promotion. You've attempted to circumvent the draft process when your draft article was declined by creating it directly in Wikipedia space and have not listened to any of the concerns raised by other editors.--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:24, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Rbworld528 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #22705 was submitted on Sep 18, 2018 21:51:03. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 21:51, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rudy Bundini, you may be blocked from editing. This is for removing his former name twice from my deletion discussion page comments. Largoplazo (talk) 22:55, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please Unblock my user account - I am not a spammer[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rbworld528 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I would like to request to be unblocked. I would really appreciate it if the admins would unblock me. I am the newbie here and I have a lot to learn. It was really came to my surprise how many people were attacking me and think that I am a spammer and I am promoting a business or someone. I found this person that I think worthy to be on Wikipedia, I did the research and created a page for him. I did contact him to get some information and permission and gather sources from my research. I did editing for other profiles too but I did them awhile back with different username and I thought if I created a new user name, it will be recognize as the first author and other people can jump in to help but I will still be the first creator. But I didn't realize that I used the similar name then people think that I am him and I will promote myself. But I am not him, I am a professional female who works and live in Silicon Valley. As the newbie who took a lot of time to do research and learned how to create a profile is really shocking and sad situation that how much hate that I can see and received from people here. I am not a spammer, I don't get pay to do this and I just think that some new people need to get attention and respect as the new influencer. Also, we can keep an eye on them too because they have a lot of followers and will give impact to many people. I did also help create other people profile for two different languages but unfortunately I didn't use this username, those people have the same format how I created Rudy's page that might still have many imperfect resources and I need to do more research. Could you please unblock me? Because Rudy Bundini shouldn't be punished because of me. My self also needs to grow and learn more with how wikipedia operate. I also as the contributor for the wikipedia page and I donated several times and I will continue to do so. How much hate I received and call me as a spammer it's breaking my heart and discourage me to do more and learn more. If I may ask to the admins, could you please unblock me? Thanks so much for everyone who read this and I hope the admins will be unblocked me and wikipedia community will help me to grow. --Rbworld528 (talk) 21:41, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Firstly, Mr. Bundini will not be punished by your block, assuming that, as you say, you are not him. Secondly, I do not see any attacks being made on you. There are multiple attempts to explain where you are making mistakes; possibly you have misinterpreted them because English is, I suspect, not your first language. Thirdly, your article is unquestionably grossly promotional, and its removal is, I regret to have to say, entirely correct. Please you could tell us where you found initial details on this person. I feel that unless and until you understand the problems in your editing and undertake to correct them unblock is unlikely.----Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 22:05, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

File permission problem with File:Rudy Bundini, Army look, Sept 7, 2018.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Rudy Bundini, Army look, Sept 7, 2018.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

Also:

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 22 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]