User talk:ReGoG Now

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!)[edit]

Here are a few links you might find helpful:

You can sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing ~~~~; our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

We're so glad you're here! --Simonkoldyk 01:20, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. OhNoitsJamie Talk 23:01, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Don't remove vandalism warnings[edit]

You are not supposed to remove vandalism warnings from your own userpage. I trust you were acting in good faith. TheDJ (talkcontribsWikiProject Television) 17:41, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

When was I vandalizing...?
Looking at the history of the pages: you got the warning for one of these edits:
You may consider this to be another warning. Stop vandalizing and spreading your Point of View. TheDJ (talkcontribsWikiProject Television) 18:44, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for disrupting Wikipedia to illustrate a point. Please note that utilizing Wikipedia to illustrate a point is disruptive and unacceptable. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires. -Changlc 00:16, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Edits to South Korea[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Some of your recent edits, such as those you made to South Korea, have been considered unhelpful or unconstructive and have been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Saligron 02:29, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is your final warning. If you continue to replace traditional characters with simplified irrespective of context you will be blocked for disruption for longer periods of time. Wikipedia is not the place for you to grind your political axe. Please stop and consider making constructive contributions instead. -Loren 21:38, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a short time in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. Please stop. You're welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

-Loren 03:32, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ReGoG Now (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Please provide my evidence of vandalism. Is it because I'm pro-KMT while you're a member of the Pan-Green and A-bian? Because I do not agree with your views, you give me this, correct? Because I've been trying my best not to start a fight with you.

Decline reason:

The unblock template is to be used to request an unblock, not to communicate back with the person who blocked you. — Yamla 22:49, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Good work. Thanks! Xiner (talk, email) 22:21, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning.
The next time you violate Wikipedia's NPOV rule by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did to Republic of China presidential election, 2008, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Nlu (talk) 07:28, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ReGoG Now (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

OK Nlu. I learned my lesson about the NPOV rule. However, it sickens me how it seems that TI-ers here can practically do anything they want and edit any page they desire, while people that support reunification are being punished. Even moderators inside Wikipedia have admitted that a few mods are biased here. I agree with your decision in blocking me from editing pages, and I apologize for this. I will try to not do it again. If I do, you can block my account from reading as well. Please accept my apology and allow me to edit again.

Decline reason:

I'm not convinced you understand the purpose here. Wikipedia is not a battleground. Mangojuicetalk 13:38, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.