User talk:Religiousmyth

Religiousmyth, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Religiousmyth! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cullen328 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 10 December 2021 (UTC)

January 2022

Hi Religiousmyth! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. David Biddulph (talk) 17:49, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@David Biddulph:Thanks for the information but can you tell me which wikipedia article your talking about? Religiousmyth (talk) 18:38, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Matherchod

The article Matherchod has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable for enwiki. nor any references

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Happy Editing--IAm Chaos 06:34, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@IAmChaos: Let me first improve the article and add some reliable source for supporting the statement then you can decide if you still want to propose for deletion. Thank you. Religiousmyth (talk) 06:40, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Matherchod moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Matherchod, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. – AssumeGoodWraith (talk | contribs) 08:43, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfD is not for articles you don't like

I suggest you not make further submissions to articles for deletion until you understand the criteria. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 01:24, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Matherchod

Hello, Religiousmyth. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Matherchod, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:02, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Matherchod

Hello, Religiousmyth. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Matherchod".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! -- EN-Jungwon 10:35, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. WindTempos ^{(talk • contribs)} 09:34, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a spam link. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. WindTempos ^{(talk • contribs)} 09:40, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 14:51, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]