User talk:Rex65mya

Welcome!

On 22 February 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Potamophylax coronavirus, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Potamophylax coronavirus's range has been described as a battlefield between scientists and hydropower plant management? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Potamophylax coronavirus. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Potamophylax coronavirus), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

wikipedia may i be unblocked

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rex65mya (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i learned about the copyright policies and i don't know how i vandalised, if you can tell me please do so i can fix my mistakes

Decline reason:

This is not convincing. Yamla (talk) 10:17, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rex65mya (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

may i have a second chance. i promise not to do any copyright or vandalism. I learned from my mistakes Rex65mya (talk) 18:15, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

As copyright violations potentially put Wikipedia in legal jeopardy, we must be convinced that you understand what copyright is and when and how copyrighted content can be used on Wikipedia. You say you have read about it, you must demonstrate this by explaining it in your own words. I get the sense that perhaps you lack the skills and maturity needed to partcipate here; you will need to convince us otherwise. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 10:03, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Per Wikipedia:KEEPDECLINEDUNBLOCK Users are not allowed to remove declined unblock requests. Lavalizard101 (talk) 20:09, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rex65mya (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

1. I have been on the ordovician period side of wikipedia and i notice lots or articles that are stubs. I would like to be unblocked so i can make theses stubs non stubs and so i can improve wikipedia Rex65mya (talk) 21:10, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only; you forgot to address the reason for your block. Yamla (talk) 11:29, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

UTRS appeal #56590

is closed. I did not see the HOAX article concern. That would explain the vandalism block. You'll need to address that as well. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 02:27, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deepfriedokra (talk) I do not see anything about hoax unless they mean when i was new and did not know the rules relly. I also accidently messed up the Opossum classification section a little (got reverted) but other then that i don't see anything. I will keep searching just in case i missed something. Rex65mya (talk)

One of your pages was deleted as a hoax article. Hard to find 'cause you keep removing content form your talk page. Maybe it's in your talk page archives. You should have seen it at the time. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:43, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Here we are. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:48, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As you have been told before, you must more specifically address what you did to merit a block, and what you would do instead. Thanks, --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:49, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rex65mya (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was blocked due to copyright, vandalism and hoax. The hoax article was the article SCP 001-100. I did not realize that this was a hoax article. I will go over the wikipedian guidelines again before editing wikipedia to make sure hoax articles and vandalism does not occur agian

Decline reason:

As long as you keep abusing multiple accounts, you will not be unblocked. The standard offer is available to you. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 23:22, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

User has evaded their block as PermianExtinction. --Yamla (talk) 18:55, 5 May 2022 (UTC) Yet more attempted block evasion with User:Dinosaurloard123. Lavalizard101 (talk) 23:18, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Lamar, Colorado wind gusting 2021

Hello, Rex65mya. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Lamar, Colorado wind gusting 2021, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:33, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Lamar, Colorado wind gusting 2021

Hello, Rex65mya. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Lamar".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:36, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Enchanted: Forest of Light

Hello, Rex65mya. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Enchanted: Forest of Light, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:04, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Enchanted: Forest of Light

Hello, Rex65mya. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Enchanted: Forest of Light".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 17:03, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:List of Hot Jupiters

Hello, Rex65mya. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of Hot Jupiters, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:01, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:List of Hot Jupiters

Hello, Rex65mya. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of Hot Jupiters".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:26, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of Neptunian exoplanets for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Neptunian exoplanets is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Neptunian exoplanets until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

🪐Kepler-1229b | talk | contribs🪐 17:05, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]