The rules of wikipedia are clear : no wp:original research. Wikipedia is not a place to express personal opinions / points of view. This song was described as pop by one very wp:reliable source. If you don't have a source (from a famous music paper) saying what you support, it is original research. Other very important point, you always have to wp:STICKTOSOURCE when editing. Woovee (talk) 19:10, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
- A song description has not anything to do with OR. Guitar techniques, sound effects... it's all music theory and practice. Do you think it's OR if you call a cube "angular"? No. Because it is angular. Or do you need a source for that? And don't tell me what Wikipedia is. I'm working with Wikipedia since 2003... --RivetHeadCulture (talk) 11:52, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
Please do not attack other editors, as you did at User talk:Binksternet. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Acroterion (talk) 12:47, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
- What attack? It was a warning, the same he gave me. An attack looks different. --RivetHeadCulture (talk) 13:03, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
- Are you kidding? User:Binksternet vandalizes permanently articles, removes sources, and that's the only thing you have to say? Leave my discussion page, please. Thanks. --RivetHeadCulture (talk) 17:38, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
Do not continue to remove the CSD tag at Common Language (band). As the author of the article you cannot remove the tag yourself; instead please use the talk page as instructed in the deletion template to dispute the deletion. An admin will review the article and the speedy deletion request in due time. --Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 18:36, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
Nomination of Common Language (band) for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Common Language (band) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. JMHamo (talk) 00:18, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Siouxsie and the Banshees - Arabian Knights.ogg
Thanks for uploading File:Siouxsie and the Banshees - Arabian Knights.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).