User talk:Rma17

Rma17, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Rma17! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Jtmorgan (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

New article

Thanks for creating Jazz-funk dance, unfortunately the article has no references or citations. Please see Wikipedia:Citing sources for information on how to add references, or ask me if you have any questions. --Canley (talk) 13:59, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

April 2022

Hello, I'm Le Marteau. I noticed that in this edit to Hip hop dance, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Le Marteau (talk) 13:17, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

i dont know where i must explain the reason, i ve just created the Jazz- funk dance style.... there explaining what is the difference between hip-hop, but it is not genre of hip-hop . someone added this to hip- hop page..im professional dancer,this is not genre of hip-hop....so please delete it by yourself Rma17 (talk) 13:20, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Rma17. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Rma17. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Rma17|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. PRAXIDICAE💕 21:17, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Im dancer. and just editing dance page and creating articles, for famous dancers for free because this is my sphere. Wikipedia is ensiclopedy for our future. after your message i'm leaving wikipedia. i dont want create any page anymore. Rma17 (talk) 21:29, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, such as at Talk:Salif Gueye, (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 22:51, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edits to Jazz-funk dance

I’ve noticed your recent edits to Jazz-funk dance and I’m wondering what your source for them is. I presume it’s a source already on the page, but if not it’d be nice to know, and if it is from a source already on the page it’d be nice to have a footnote MRN2electricboogaloo (talk) 00:18, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Funky Style (Dance) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Funky Style (Dance) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Funky Style (Dance) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

PAVLOV (talk) 11:33, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ahlamalik Williams moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Ahlamalik Williams, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DMySon (talk) 12:43, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ahlamalik Williams moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Ahlamalik Williams, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CUPIDICAE💕 22:13, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ahlamalik Williams (April 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CNMall41 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Notability is not inherent and seems like all the press is recent and associated with his relationship with Madonna.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ahlamalik Williams and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ahlamalik Williams, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CNMall41 (talk) 15:20, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your attention. I have updated the links. it was hard to find them among the news about pop Queen Madonna. Ahlamalik Williams is famous in Dance World. Rma17 (talk) 02:14, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ahlamalik Williams (April 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Praxidicae were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ahlamalik Williams and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ahlamalik Williams, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

PRAXIDICAE💕 20:04, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ahlamalik Williams for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ahlamalik Williams is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ahlamalik Williams until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

PRAXIDICAE💕 21:17, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sadeck Waff moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Sadeck Waff, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. PRAXIDICAE💕 21:18, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Geometrie Variable moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Geometrie Variable, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. PRAXIDICAE💕 21:28, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Salif Gueye

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Salif Gueye, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. PRAXIDICAE💕 21:30, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

no. why r u deleting our art, future.....Art is moving , improving by the time.....After social media, we watch others around the world and can improve art speedly. Rma17 (talk) 21:34, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is my second article.......... Rma17 (talk) 21:35, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Restore my pages what i created before i wrote on your talkpage......... i have referended every sentence.... Rma17 (talk) 21:36, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You need to respond to the inquiry about your status as a paid editor. PRAXIDICAE💕 21:38, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Who gave me this status????? Rma17 (talk) 21:41, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You say you're not paid and have no WP:COI, so please explain how all of these professional images are your own work: File:Salif Gueye.jpg, File:Sadeck Waff.jpg, File:Ahlamalik Williams.jpg? PRAXIDICAE💕 21:45, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

i dont know how to download files. so u can delete them and download again. Rma17 (talk) 21:47, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

i watched on youtube, how to download... and i dont know what lisence i must to choose, when the file is free using by author. Rma17 (talk) 21:49, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

u can watch my edits on dance style pages....if i was paided, then who paid me for creating Jazz Funk dance style. editing High Heels dance style..... Rma17 (talk) 21:45, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That is not what was asked. What is your connection to the subjects you've written about? PRAXIDICAE💕 21:47, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Love for art. Rma17 (talk) 22:16, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Salif Gueye for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Salif Gueye is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Salif Gueye until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

PRAXIDICAE💕 16:47, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Do what u want...i will not work for wikiedia anymore. u have deleted all what i have created. i will ad your name on Teahouse, for adminstrators. your reaseon is " u think i paided user"....and moving my pages.... search before theese people, who they are. Wikipedia needs to add them, not they. Rma17 (talk) 12:40, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Geometrie Variable (May 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kaleeb18 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please use reliable sources. YouTube and IMDb are not reliable sources see WP:RSPYT and WP:IMBD. Also see Help:Referencing for beginners

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Geometrie Variable and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Geometrie Variable, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

― Kaleeb18^Talk_Caleb 18:56, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Geometrie Variable (May 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Star Mississippi was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Runner up in a competition does not establish notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Geometrie Variable and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Geometrie Variable, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Star Mississippi 17:10, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you. I will add new Sourches. But this group is about XXI century new creatings of Tutting dance. Notability is in dance sphere. Rma17 (talk) 22:33, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

which you need to prove with reliable sourcing. Notability in the dance sphere does not necessarily translate Star Mississippi 01:33, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Rma17

Thank you for creating Jazz-funk dance.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 05:43, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sadeck Waff (July 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Missvain was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Hi.

I’m sorry, but the sourcing here isn’t helping the subject meet our General Notability Guidelines. All the sources here are either affiliated with the subject, passing mentions, or from non-notable news sources. Appearing on reality shows and not winning also does not establish notability.

We need *significant* in-depth coverage (that is independent of the subject - meaning no promotional pieces, government websites, event websites, social media, press releases, paid coverage) in notable major media outlets or by notable publishers about Sadeck Waff. Examples: magazine and newspaper reviews and features about Sadeck Waff specifically; books or peer-reviewed white papers written ABOUT Sadeck Waff; television and radio features ABOUT Sadeck Waff.

So also see WP:RS for additional guidance on what reliable secondary sources are.

If those are available, please improve this submission. If not, then it might not be the right time (WP:TOOSOON) for Sadeck Waff to have a Wikipedia article.

I hope you will consider improving existing Wikipedia content about other subjects of interest!

If you have any questions please ask them at WP:TEAHOUSE.

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia!

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sadeck Waff and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Sadeck Waff, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Missvain (talk) 22:10, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Geometrie Variable for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Geometrie Variable is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Geometrie Variable until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Star Mississippi 16:54, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sadeck Waff for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sadeck Waff is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sadeck Waff until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Star Mississippi 17:23, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Sadeck Waff

Hello, Rma17. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sadeck Waff, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:10, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Geometrie Variable

Hello, Rma17. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Geometrie Variable, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:17, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Sadeck Waff

Hello, Rma17. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sadeck Waff".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:45, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Geometrie Variable

Hello, Rma17. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Geometrie Variable".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:39, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]