User talk:Rosesandguns

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome[edit]

Hello Rosesandguns, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.


Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Need help?

How you can help:

Additional tips...

Rosesandguns, good luck, and have fun. --Aboutmovies (talk) 06:41, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

Rosesandguns, you are invited to the Teahouse[edit]

Teahouse logo

Hi Rosesandguns! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Please join other people who edit Wikipedia at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space on Wikipedia where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! SarahStierch (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:22, 11 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Rouben Galichian, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

  • I changed the references in this article so they link to Worldcat, not a bookdealer. I also removed some POV--please don't use a biographical article as an opportunity for advocacy.
DGG ( talk ) 20:36, 11 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article Campaign on granting Nizami the status of the national poet of Azerbaijan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The article is written to promote a point of view. In fact, it qualifies for speedy deletion as promotion, but I am not at present taking that route, to allow time for rewriting in a neutral way. If, however, it remains in its present form, it must be deleted. Wikipedia does not exist in order to provide a platform for promoting opinions, campaigns, or points of view.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:31, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Campaign on granting Nizami the status of the national poet of Azerbaijan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Campaign on granting Nizami the status of the national poet of Azerbaijan until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. JamesBWatson (talk) 09:48, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]