Jump to content

User talk:Rosuacamus

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: Julian Kim (March 21)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Anuwrites were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
ANUwrites 09:57, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Rosuacamus! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ANUwrites 09:57, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the prompt response. Since the review process may take up to 2 months, I only included basic information initially. Julian Kim is an opera singer; he portrayed the Phantom in the Korean replica production of 'The Phantom of the Opera,' the musical. Would it be beneficial to include this reference? I plan to start simple and add additional details later, as his extensive work as a lead singer in operas would be challenging to summarize completely upfront and might risk rejection again. Rosuacamus (talk) 10:09, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
He won multiple competitions including Concours International de Chant de Toulouse (1st place) and Verdi Competiton (2nd place). He was lead singers in more than 20 operas in Italy. I can reference them. Would it help? Rosuacamus (talk) 10:25, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Julian Jootaek Kim

[edit]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Julian Jootaek Kim, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 13:55, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I just saw your comment now. I think I've fixed all the bare URLs. I appreciate you taking your precious time to help newbies like myself improve the articles. This means a lot to me. Rosuacamus (talk) 15:28, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Phillip Jeong

[edit]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Phillip Jeong, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 15:11, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I saw this also just now. I didn't even know what a bare URL was, but now I do. If you have any other critical comments, please feel free to share them. Thanks a million. Rosuacamus (talk) 15:31, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Phillip Jeong

[edit]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Phillip Jeong, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 10:43, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Phillip Jeong lead

[edit]

You can remove the citations in the Phillip Jeong lead by the way. You don't need them! TheWikiToby (talk) 04:49, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I expanded the lead section and removed the citations, thanks to your comment. Rosuacamus (talk) 04:59, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Miraclass

[edit]

Hello, Rosuacamus,

Thank you for creating Miraclass.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

This is a big undertaking and well done. It is a very long article and a bit hard to navigate - remember, we are only trying to chronicle the most relevant/interesting content, and the reader can get more detail elsewhere. Well done.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Aszx5000}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Aszx5000 (talk) 20:36, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Aszx5000: Thank you for reading and commenting on the article. I could merge the three tables of group and individual activities into one and remove the large discography table since there are Wikipedia articles for individual members. Once that's done, I can tweak the body of the article for better flow. What do you think? It may take a few days. ~~~~ Rosuacamus (talk) 03:48, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That sounds great. In all cases, stick to only the most interesting/important content that would hold a casual reader's attention, and might encourage them to dig deeper into the topic on more detailed sources. thanks. Aszx5000 (talk) 10:36, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Aszx5000: Great! I'll do it in a few days. Have a good weekend! ~~~~ Rosuacamus (talk) 11:36, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Aszx5000: I have merged the tables and deleted one, bringing the article to 119,095 bytes. While the article appears lengthy, this is primarily due to the extensive reference section. If you believe further shortening is necessary, I am prepared to go for it; however, it's important to note that many of the references are in Korean and Italian, which may not be easily accessible for English-speaking readers. ~~~~ Rosuacamus (talk) 11:08, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That looks much better. As always in WP, less is more, which is the key to engaging the casual reader (our target audience). Well done. Aszx5000 (talk) 11:12, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks a million! I’ll go through the article again to slim it down even further. Rosuacamus (talk) 11:39, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A belated welcome!

[edit]
The welcome may be belated, but the cookies are still warm!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Rosuacamus! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! TheWikiToby (talk) 03:42, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I was just wandering around looking for something to do and noticed you never got a proper welcome message, so here it is! TheWikiToby (talk) 03:43, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
What a heart-warming welcome! Glad to hear from you. I'm learning with every edit and thoroughly enjoying it! Thanks a lot! Rosuacamus (talk) 10:42, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Phillip Jeong

[edit]
Hi Rosuacamus, I've now finished my copy-edit. I noticed some uncited sentences and have marked them with {{cn}} tags; please see WP:BLP. I've also removed some unnecessary subsections and retitled a couple of sections. From a c/e point of view, the rest of the article seems fine now. Cheers, Baffle☿gab 03:30, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks a lot! I will carefully read through the changes you made. For now, I will add citations. Warm thanks again for your help and support! Rosuacamus (talk) 02:00, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]