User talk:RufaMoritz

April 2023

Hello, I'm Skynxnex. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Chono have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Skynxnex (talk) 16:19, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dear mr or Skynxnex

I have to ask something

why my post is removed, i'm trying to add Khelents armoured vehicle to Mongolian armoured force.

I downloaded mongolian 2022 parade photo and added the photo but wikipedia is appearing it's copyright. Khelents vehicle is Mongolian smart designed secret military vehicle. I'm sorry for named it Chono, it was Khelents also can you appear this because i'm new user else i can study from internet or wikipedia

FROM user RufaMoritz RufaMoritz (talk) 16:42, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @RufaMoritz, the article Chono is a disambiguation page, that is, a page that lists the articles on Wikipedia that share nearly the same title. So at least right now, it's intended to direct readers to other articles and not be an article itself. If you'd like to start an article about the Khelents vehicle, please read WP:Your first article, which is very daunting, I know. Writing your first article is one of the harder things at Wikipedia so it may make sense to read more and try to do small edits to improve existing articles about things you know about. Like other Mongolian armed forces articles or whatever you're interested in. Also take a look at things like WP:HELP and such to get an idea of how to contribute. I hope you decide to stay and look forward to seeing you around. Thanks! Skynxnex (talk) 22:11, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Skynxnex

I have to ask something really special

i was planning to add Eol 1, 2 tusul in Mongolian AirForce

Eol1, 2 tusul is Mongolian first military drone.

You think it's horrible if i explain Mongolian armoured force's secret

but 'Khelents' isn't not really secret because military commanders was explaining about the car 'Khelents' and some videos about 'Khelents' vehicle on youtube. The reason of i explained this secret is Everyone also other countries citizens are said Mongolian military is trash on TikTok, Instagram, faceBook, evrywhere. 'Khelents' vehicle can up Mongolian army's reputation. I am not saying it's your fault about my deleted post, i was having not enough photo, equipment.

I wish you can post about 'Khelents' light amoured military vehicle. From RufaMoritz, Kid who from Mongolia. RufaMoritz (talk) 06:44, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I don't really know very much about this topic. I'd welcome you to do research and perhaps write a WP:DRAFT in your user space or in Draft space if it's developed enough. Feel free to read existing articles of similar topics and/or look at WP:MILITARY to perhaps learn more. Skynxnex (talk) 13:45, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on List of equipment of the Mongolian Armed Forces

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page List of equipment of the Mongolian Armed Forces, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 09:50, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on List of equipment of the Mongolian Armed Forces

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page List of equipment of the Mongolian Armed Forces, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL" error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 09:50, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of equipment of the Mongolian Armed Forces, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page File. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023

Hello, I'm Recoil16. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, S-300 missile system, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. – Recoil16 (talk) 22:03, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Recoil16, I agree that there ne reliable sources in my post but i never post anything without any source

this source is not proven and posted in public chat, I believe that is untrustable but true https://www.quora.com/Does-Mongolia-have-strong-military-forces-and-weapons

"The Mongolian Air Defense Force is responsible for defending the country from air attack. The Air Defense Force is equipped with a variety of anti-aircraft weapons, including Russian-made S-300 missile systems."

RufaMoritz (talk) 06:17, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024

Please do not remove information from articles, as you did to T-90. Wikipedia is not censored, and content is not removed on the sole grounds of perceived offensiveness. Please discuss this issue on the article's talk page to reach consensus rather than continuing to remove the disputed material. If the content in question involves images, you also have the option to configure Wikipedia to hide the images that you may find offensive. Thank you. TylerBurden (talk) 21:29, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop attacking other editors. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Mr. Komori (talk) 22:44, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mr. Komori vandalized my edit, i have been editing since september but he destroyed all my work, He did that even with out knowing and spreading fake news.

he edited List of equipment of the Mongolian Armed Forces#Vehicles without even reseachring.

i spent 3 months to edit all and reseach but he changed my edit, i want complaint. RufaMoritz (talk) 08:25, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

First of all, most of your edits there were unsourced, and the ones that were sourced used the SIPRI database, which only lists the amount of equipment received, not the number in service (e.g. some vehicles can be used as source for spare parts), unlike the IISS Military Balance. All I did was remove unsourced entries, and add citations for the entries that I managed to verify. The burden of proof is on the editor who adds or restores material, not on the one who removes it.

Second, you don't own articles on Wikipedia, this is a collaborative project that anyone can join. I suggest you to stop casting aspersions and drop the stick at once, or you may end up blocked from editing. Mr. Komori (talk) 10:35, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bro your edits are unsourced and just copied from "Military wiki|fandom". Have you researched that? RufaMoritz (talk) 08:49, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can you prove it? Diffs or it didn't happen.

[1] I provided sources for all of my edits, if you refuse to assume good faith I'll have to report you to the administrators.

BTW, my sources are the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute trade registers database and the International Institute for Strategic Studies Military Balance 2023, which are pretty reliable sources. Mr. Komori (talk) 11:46, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nah Mongolian military sources always was poor. You can't find all Mongolian military equipment from one site, even it's popular rich in sources site because there is editors like you.

there is URL's

http://www.imedee.mn/n/20033

https://mass.mn/n/47884

https://vpk.name/en/569065_mongolia-received-four-more-mig-29ub-combat-training-fighters-from-russia.html

https://www.militaryfactory.com/aircraft/by-country.php?Nation=Mongolia RufaMoritz (talk) 15:49, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OK, so you can't prove that my edits were unsourced, so instead you claim that there's no good sources instead? At this point your arguments against me are getting even more nonsensical.

The IISS and SIPRI are independent think tanks run by specialists, they don't operate like Wikipedia and they are reputable sources (feel free to ask at the RS noticeboard: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard). BTW, "The Military Balance" is a book, not a website.

Also, I didn't use any of the sources that you mentioned. Like I've said diffs or it didn't happen. Mr. Komori (talk) 18:51, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I took the liberty of looking at your edits, and and found this: [2] some of the sources (SIPRI Trade Registers, World Air Forces, The Military Balance) that you've cited are the same as mine, except that I've used the 2023 edition of The Military Balance.

Most of your entries have no citations, like these: [3] [4] [5] and some of the citations that you included aren't reliable (Armyrecognition, Military Factory): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_371#Global_Firepower_Index

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_240#militaryfactory.com

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_344#armyrecognition.com

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_349#Army_Recognition

At this point I think is best for you to stop digging yourself even deeper. Mr. Komori (talk) 19:38, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you spreading fake news, i spent more than 4 months on List of equipment of the Mongolian Armed Forces, I have researched long time about mongolian military and edited before you did that RufaMoritz (talk) 08:11, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I told you, you can't find all Mongolian military equipment in one site because Mongolian military keeps everything as secret. Are you stupid? ur edit is poor in sources RufaMoritz (talk) 08:17, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Are you from Mongolia?, I think you are because you are getting mad about single thing for whole day, Why do you like argument, I spent 4 months on my edit and you deleted it. RufaMoritz (talk) 08:19, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of equipment of the Mongolian Armed Forces, you may be blocked from editing. Mr. Komori (talk) 22:46, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Wikipedia, @Mr. Komori vandalized my edit that i spent more than 4 months but he deleted and arguing with that he's sources are true, I told him Mongolian military always keeps as secret everything even it's just a single thing and you can't find all Mongolian military equipment from one site but he is arguing with me, I have worked so hard on my edits but he deleted my 4 months work. It feels so hard to me because one guy vandalized me edit and saying you edit is fake, Even i sent all sources URL's to him but led to other topic.

Wikipedia if i proven that @Mr. Komori vandalized me edit, Please edit List of equipment of the Mongolian Armed Forces to past and block him from this topic. RufaMoritz (talk) 08:28, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Mr. Komori (talk) 10:03, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to Eastern Europe or the Balkans, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

TylerBurden (talk) 21:30, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Drmies (talk) 14:28, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

RufaMoritz, there are two things going on here. First, you simply need to accept that edits here have to be verified by reliable sources. So, you said, "Dear Recoil16, I agree that there ne reliable sources in my post but i never post anything without any source"--well, that's a contradiction, and the last part is simply not true: you have made many edits without any sourcing, and to top it off without any explanation of what you were doing. Second, the harassing comments you made ([6], [7]) are not acceptable--and in comments like this one, "I told you, you can't find all Mongolian military equipment in one site because Mongolian military keeps everything as secret. Are you stupid? ur edit is poor in sources", you combine harassment with incompetence. I urge you to reconsider this pattern, lest you be blocked again. Drmies (talk) 14:34, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]