Jump to content

User talk:Rupert Nichol

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome...

Hello, Rupert Nichol, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.  Again, welcome! Sweet xxTalk 16:17, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

August 2010

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Yangtse Incident (1957 film), please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --Sweet xxTalk 16:17, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Models of warships

[edit]

Rupert, I really like the sections you are adding to various warships (e.g. Daring class destroyer (1949)#Models). These sections could be improved a lot if you put in citations (footnotes) showing where the information comes from.--Toddy1 (talk) 16:37, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Dear Toddy 1 (and Sweet Talk last year)

Many thanks for your comments. I usually try to put in as many internal Wiki references as I can, to support my small contributions to Naval History, and Railway or Tramway topics. I find the Wiki footnotes system cumbersome and difficult to understand.

My refs for the current contributions on ship models are only web pages on other people's sites, and I am unsure how to index these. (The basic knowledge is my own memory in many cases). I am not trying to create full lists of models of each type, but to record models which existed at the time the ships were in service, which had the historical function of increasing awareness of these now forgotten post-war & cold-war naval ship types to a younger generation in the 1950s & 60s.

The references for the Triang Minic models are Here:

http://www.triangminicships.com/classic_edition/catalogues/2nd_edition.htm (pps 7, 8, 9) http://www.triangminicships.com/classic_edition/catalogues/1st_edition.htm (p3)

Evidence of the models' continuing interest to collectors comes from several sites, which change as items are sold: (they also appear and disappear on e-bay) eg: http://www.uniquecollections.co.uk/showpage.asp?dept=91&Triang+%2F+Spot+On+Models%2FMinic+Ships http://www.groovycart.co.uk/cart.php?c=551&cat=Triang+1st+%2F2nd+series+ships http://waterline-ships.co.uk/index.php?cPath=81&osCsid=8e01e776d983a4a59c6c19cce3b27b81

The Albatros models are again part of a dealer's site, which cannot be relied upon; DARING: http://www.anticsonline.co.uk/2010_1_105337396.html VANGUARD: http://www.anticsonline.co.uk/2010_1_2736575.html (I would also like to use these excellent photos to illustrate the articles: how do i incorporate them into Wiki Commons?)

The Frog model ships info is even more ephemeral, and comes in enthusiast's talk pages:

I actually cannot find the pages with Frog's Undine, Blackpool and Trafalgar moels that i saw earlier this year. The served to confirm my memories, but are no use as wiki refs!

Any advice from you about how to ref these pages and pictures is welcome.

Rupert Nichol (talk) 17:03, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Rupert Nichol

(Royal Navy: 1969-1987)

Talkback

[edit]
Hello, Rupert Nichol. You have new messages at Talk:Type 45 destroyer.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Bedford Incident, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Crimson Tide (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:19, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Zulu (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Buffalo River (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:50, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Cruel Sea (1953 film), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Zulu and Castle-class (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:26, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited HMS President (1918), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Minesweepers and The Cruel Sea (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:32, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Your addition to Yeovilton has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

The information about the church is useful but would need to be put into your own words before it can be added to wikipedia.— Rod talk 17:26, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for getting back to me. You suggest you added the text as it is in the public domain, however the web site it was taken from says (c) Fleet Air Arm Museum. Most web sites (and books, journals etc) are covered by copyright (even if they don't say so) and can not be copied unless they specifically say this or someone (eg the web site owner) sends the appropriate message to wikipedia - if you are the web site owner let me know & I'll send more details. It you rewrite it into your own words you can add the source as a reference using any of several citation systems - I use WP:cite web. It is not original research if you can show a reliable source which can be verified.
The standard order of sections is set out at WP:UKCITY. If you want to have another go I'd be happy to help - in fact you have picqued my interest and I intend to start a new article just about the church & am working on it at User:Rodw/Sandbox/Church of St Bartholomew, Yeovilton.— Rod talk 18:28, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Ok Thanks - I shouldn't have reverted your change to south of the road - I'd be happy with that. You are welcome to edit the St Bartholomew article in my sand box & I will put in there about the RNAS links etc, or you can wait to edit it until I put it into article space which will probably be this evening.— Rod talk 19:36, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The new article is now up at Church of St Bartholomew, Yeovilton for everyone to edit.— Rod talk 21:39, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of ship names of the Royal Navy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Daring-class destroyer (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:37, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

June 2013

[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Sink the Bismarck! may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 06:12, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Stinger (cocktail), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kiss Them for Me (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:54, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

August 2013

[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of ship names of the Royal Navy may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • * ''[[HMS Venus|Venus]]'': (an apochryphal ship's name used in the [[scatalogical]] drinking song ''[[Good Ship Venus]]''; (

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:42, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Flower-class sloop, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ASW (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:54, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

HMS Chrysanthemum (1917) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Medway River
HMS President (1918) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Medway River

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:30, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

November 2013

[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Personal union may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • the French throne]] were finally abandoned in 1800, following the abolition of the French monarchy).

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:51, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Cruel Sea (1953 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Zulu (film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of international auto racing colors, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Or (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 17:09, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of international auto racing colors, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Napier and Bleu de France (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lobnitz, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Blackfriars (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited London King's Cross railway station, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Great Northern Railway and South Eastern Railway (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:47, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Season's Greetings

[edit]
File:Xmas Ornament.jpg

To You and Yours!

FWiW Bzuk (talk) 18:43, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, Rupert Nichol. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Merry, merry!

[edit]

From the icy Canajian north; to you and yours! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 23:13, 26 December 2016 (UTC) [reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Rupert Nichol. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Seasons' Greetings

[edit]

...to you and yours, from the Great White North! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 17:57, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Beacon Mill, Rottingdean, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Heinemann (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Rupert Nichol. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Iron Cross

[edit]

Please add citations when you add content and use edit summaries. Wikipedia is a collaborative project. Chris Troutman (talk) 17:19, 20 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Steam locomotive, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Blücher (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:05, 12 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nicholas Winton, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page LNER (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:59, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Crowe Hall, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ITV (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:12, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

HMS Broke

[edit]

The newspaper you quoted doesn't actually support what you added - it was written before the film was shot (so plans may have changed or the footage shot may not have been used in the final print) and it doesn't include all the details anyway - i.e. what ship Broke was portraying and that it was John Mill's first starring role.Nigel Ish (talk) 11:48, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:29, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit reversion

[edit]

In this edit here, I reverted some information that appears to be a violation of our copyright policy.

I provided a brief summary of the problem in the edit summary, which should be visible just below my name. You can also click on the "view history" tab in the article to see the recent history of the article. This should be an edit with my name, and a parenthetical comment explaining why your edit was reverted. If that information is not sufficient to explain the situation, please ask.

I do occasionally make mistakes. We get hundreds of reports of potential copyright violations every week, and sometimes there are false positives, for a variety of reasons. (Perhaps the material was moved from another Wikipedia article, or the material was properly licensed but the license information was not obvious, or the material is in the public domain but I didn't realize it was public domain, and there can be other situations generating a report to our Copy Patrol tool that turn out not to be actual copyright violations.) If you think my edit was mistaken, please politely let me know and I will investigate. S Philbrick(Talk) 13:06, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]