User talk:Rushilsharmichael

December 2023[edit]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Nik Shahr, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Squeakachu (talk) 06:06, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm DreamRimmer. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Nikhil Sharma—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. – DreamRimmer (talk) 14:23, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I was citing the sources. Nikhil Shah (Sharma) is me, its an Indian name. That was a photo of a white guy. Rushilsharmichael (talk) 14:26, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Nikhil Sharma, you may be blocked from editing. – DreamRimmer (talk) 14:30, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's not vandalizing. Good thing these logs show as proof so we can see who is behind these messages. It's pointless to drag this issue out please. Please respect me as I respect you. Rushilsharmichael (talk) 19:17, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nikhil Shah (December 7)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nikhil Shah and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 19:01, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Rushilsharmichael! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 19:01, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

there should be no reasonable basis for this deletion. i'm going to revert your deletion and challenge you to prove or refute any information I've provided for Nikhil Shah as not true. it's none of your business if the information is 100% factual and true and of good sources. if it isn't, i'll show you numerous sources throughout wikipedia of the same exact thing. Rushilsharmichael (talk) 19:16, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Nikhil Shah[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Nikhil Shah, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Taking Out The Trash (talk) 19:12, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Nik Shah[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Nik Shah, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Squeakachu (talk) 20:03, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Stop. Please read WP:Notability, WP:Reliable sources, and WP:Autobiography before continuing to edit. Your blogs are not sufficient sources for an article. If you persist you're going to end up being blocked. Squeakachu (talk) 20:12, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not for telling the world about oneself[edit]

You are, of course, very welcome to start making contributions to the encyclopaedia, in line with Wikipedia policies and guidelines, on subjects other than yourself, in a neutral way, if you are interested in doing so. However, if you wish to publicise yourself, then there are many web sites which provide that sort of service, but Wikipedia is not one of them. In addition, while you may have come to Wikipedia sincerely believing that posting self-promotional material would be acceptable, it is difficult to believe that you honestly thought that it would be all right to do so by hijacking existing articles and replacing their content with material about yourself. If you continue in the same way, you are likely to be blocked from editing by an administrator. JBW (talk) 20:24, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. --Blablubbs (talk) 15:43, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]