User talk:Scathain

Nomination of Sky Picnic for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sky Picnic is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sky Picnic until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 09:21, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Send me a message and remember to sign with the squiggles in the symbols box. Thanks [[1]]

Since September 2007

I started contributing lately to wikipedia..However my weaknesses are in referencing..any ideas guys-does it just require alot of reading..ie finding differing opinions-sounds like alot of work getting it right academically? A problem with my dissertation at the mo. October 2007.

It takes abit of time, some reading and being confident enough to enquire with experts. Most are helpful! Just doing final dissertation editing. Then finished. December 11th, 2007.

Welcome!

Hello, Scathain, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ~~~~; this will insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!

Brian Cowan article duplicate of Brian Cowen article

The Brian Cowan article is obviously a duplicate of the Brian Cowen article, so I have redirected to the correct article. FlowerpotmaN·(t) 00:14, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Flowerpotman was spot on!

Broadcasting (Amendment) Act 2007

I agree that the Act is available elsewhere, and as part of my dissertation I have explored it and the result is what you see. I temporarily left the Act up to raise awareness of the Act among visitors but have got down to discussing it now. This hopefully removes copyright issues also Thanks all.

SCTV Digital

The article that I have created needs more citations for which I currently have no time. I have avoided any figures with regards to subcriptions or contact numbers to ensure the article is not advertising. Because it is part of the Irish television distribution landscape in nevertheless warrants encylopedic coverage while stiking a balance not to be advertising. More references may be needed and the article does resemble the website but would not be considered copyright as the info is informational in nature. It can be compared to other articles. However I would suggest amendment rather than deletion if the article is not deemed encyplopedic enough.

I have now viewed your talk page. The article must be covered in third party, reliable sources in order to be deemed notable. You may also want to see Wikipedia's notability guidelines. If you feel the deletion was in error, please request its undeletion at deletion review. I'm willing to answer any questions you may have. Thank you. Keilana^talk_(recall) 00:26, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't normally check people's talk pages, just the article's, but I will consider your suggestion in the future. Yes, I agree with you about Wikipedia's credibility; we must walk a fine line between deleting things of value and including junk that shouldn't be. Good luck on your dissertation, and thanks for your reasonable suggestions. Hopefully, Wikipedia's a pleasant learning experience for you, and that you stay to help. Regards, Keilana^talk_(recall) 00:40, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, if you can't find any sources then it will probably just get deleted again. Often times, people do not understand the difference between truth and verifiability; that difference is very important on Wikipedia. Thank you for being patient, and I hope you have a happy new year. Best regards, Keilana^talk_(recall) 00:50, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

Autoblock #1351674 lifted or expired.

Request handled by: jpgordon^∇∆∇∆ 00:02, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unblocking administrator: Please check for active autoblocks on this user after accepting the unblock request.

193.120.116.14

193.120.116.14 This is a shared IP Address it seems (mobile wireless broadband). Any edits I do almost always use my scath account, thus perhaps someone else that gets assigned this address sometimes has been identified for vandalism.Scathain (talk) 13:57, 5 April 2009 (UTC) Just clarifying[reply]

I have no idea what you are talking about with that message .Garda40 (talk) 16:37, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

And I still have no idea what you are talking about .And please do not edit messages on my talk page even your own .Please just add an updated message.

I have restored your orignal message and also added back in your updated version .Garda40 (talk) 19:47, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I will conform regarding not editing my contributions on other users talk pages. This topic is now closed as I may have unnecessarily brought up the issue of shared IP address blocks I was experiencing. My apologies for my part if so. I request this topic be closed and that no further comments are added unless brief.

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Comission for Energy Regulation Republic of Ireland.gif)

⚠

Thanks for uploading Image:Comission for Energy Regulation Republic of Ireland.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 01:03, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This image is used in the article Commission_for_Energy_Regulation, has been converted to PNG and the pic commentary updated. If you still feel this image may not be used I will not replace it again as it is up to the authority that owns it regarding its use and I will respect wikipedia rules. Thanks for your understanding, Skier Dude.

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Commission for Communications Regulation Ireland.gif)

⚠

Thanks for uploading Image:Commission for Communications Regulation Ireland.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 01:04, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This image is used ad is part of the article Commission_for_Communication_Regulation and the image has been converted to PNG.If you still feel this image may not be used I will not replace it again as it is up to the authority that owns it regarding its use and I will respect wikipedia rules. Thanks for your understanding, Skier Dude.Scathain (talk) 00:39, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

193

It may be patently clear to you what edits you are talking about but I still have no ideas what you are talking about since you never bothered to provide any links etc .I never posted a message to your User page before you started this series of messages and if I posted a message to 193 I never took it to be your account .So you have a bit of a cheek telling me to be more mannerly when I have repeatedly told you I have no idea what you are talking about

As for my talk page I don't like messages to be edited on it .I have no problem with a new message being added on to an existing message Garda40 (talk) 00:59, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Because the block is on my page further up, if you bothered read it, there is no need to provide links to it and clog your talk page up.

This topic is now closed. The topic related to before I logged into my accountan article I was updating where occasionally I don't use my account to update it. I was faced with a block due to some editing an article regarding vandalism. That is fine. I was merely clarifying that whoever it appears another user sharing the IP address with me, may have been doing the vandalism to which caused the block,that I was not doing the vandalism for my part using the IP address and that my articles under my username confirm this. That was all. To which your reply should have been, that is fine.

Maybe this update to the talk page was unnecessary as perhaps shared IP address and vandalism is well know to more seasoned wikipedians and not worthy of talk. However Garda40, you seemed to show lack of understanding and rather made a point of 'I don't know what yer talking about' rather than say, 'oh, that often happens' and that would be the end of the topic. That would be 'mannerly'. Perhaps I did not explain the problem clearly enough to you earlier. But I expect it is now clear. But now it has blown out of all proportion into a ill-mannered debate because of the way you reacted to my input on your talk page with disdain.

I see no benefit to debate further with you, nor wish to have any interaction in the future with you due to your ill-mannered attitude towards me, showing clear lack of interest in getting to the root of the issue and I don't want any more interaction with you on my talk page. I will not add to your talkpage again for my part and ask you do the same. Let's respect each others viewpoints and let it go.Scathain (talk) 19:35, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

One Vision

I saw your edit about OV entering into talks. (Personal comment: nice to see companies realising that recessions don't go on for ever. :)) Yeah, I was a bit worried about notability at the atart of the article; not that I thought that the subject was inherently non-notable, but at the stage when the consortium was really only a vehicle for the bid, I thought there might be a problem. But there has been enough commentary to generate sources since. I also have to admit that though I was following the general story of DTT over the last few years, I didn't realize that Boxer had pulled out until I read it on Wikipedia. :) FlowerpotmaN·(t) 15:34, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Dctv.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Dctv.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:22, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Broadcasting Bill 2008, Broadcasting Act 2009

You moved Broadcasting Bill 2008 to Broadcasting Act 2009 by cut-and-paste; I have now history-merged it. Please see Wikipedia:Requested moves for how to ask for a page to be moved, taking its edit history with it. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 21:06, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Easy app.pdf

Thank you for uploading File:Easy app.pdf. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:34, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Saorview.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Saorview.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:17, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Referencing at Raidió Teilifís Éireann

Your referencing at this article isn't quite right yet. At least one link I tried isn't working. In the meantime, it might be a good idea to restore your comments at the Talk Page so that other editors are aware that help might be required. Best. RashersTierney (talk) 22:59, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind. I've tweaked it and it seems fine now. RashersTierney (talk) 23:16, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Saorviewtv.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Saorviewtv.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 04:52, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Crossdresser1.JPG

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Crossdresser1.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Acather96 (talk) 18:57, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of television channels available in the Republic of Ireland may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

*[[UTV Ireland]] (set to launch January 1st 2015, has been approved by the [[Broadcasting Authority of Ireland]]<ref>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:14, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Using the minor checkbox

Hi Scathain. Thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. However, could I ask that you read WP:MINOR and stop marking all your edits with the minor edit checkbox, please? The vast majority of your changes look like they don't meet the criteria.--Otus scops (talk) 13:17, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Houses of the Oireachtas Channel (logo).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Houses of the Oireachtas Channel (logo).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 17:58, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:34, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of P5tv for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article P5tv is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/P5tv until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 06:47, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Province5TV.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Province5TV.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:53, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]