User talk:Schattentanz
Thank you for registering an account. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.
| |||||||
You can also place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will come shortly to answer your questions. | |||||||
Anna Frodesiak (talk) 09:17, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
Your user page
[edit]
Hello. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, please do not add promotional material to articles or other Wikipedia pages, as you did to your userpage. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 09:17, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
Schattentanz, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!
[edit]
|
Hi Schattentanz!! You're invited to play The Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive game to become a great contributor to Wikipedia. It's a fun interstellar journey--learn how to edit Wikipedia in about an hour. We hope to see you there! This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:44, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
|
Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!
[edit]
- Hi ! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
--
| Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
| Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
Please take a brief survey about The Wikipedia Adventure
[edit]Hi! Thanks for playing The Wikipedia Adventure, or at least considering it. We'd like to hear about your thoughts and feelings on the game, to help us improve it. Please take this brief survey: 10 minute survey.
- --thanks and cheers, Ocaasi 20:18, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Mohr im Hemd
[edit]Hello Schattentanz,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Mohr im Hemd for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Lemonmelonsuperstar (talk) 13:07, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Whack & Slaughter (December 30)
[edit]
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Whack & Slaughter.
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the . Please remember to link to the submission!
- You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.
- Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! A412 (Talk • C) 18:12, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Whack & Slaughter (January 12)
[edit]- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Whack & Slaughter.
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the . Please remember to link to the submission!
- You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.
- Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Chris1834 (talk) 14:32, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
Response for article review.
[edit]Most of the articles you referenced seem to have been around for nearly a decade. Unfortunately for you, Wikipedia has put in guidelines since that try to establish notability for an article before it is created so that the encyclopedia is not full of tiny articles that aren't useful to most people. I reviewed your three references: The 1st to are profile pages which are not very extensive and the third is a thread which is not even considered a valid source. If you could find one magazine/newspaper article (online or otherwise) that talks about it a little deeper than a profile page, you would probably be OK for references. I have gone through the 5 pages you sent me and marked them for improvement as well. As you can imagine, once these new rules come in to place, it can take a long time to bring everything up to this level (Especially when we are all volunteers and over 100 new articles asked to be approved every day). Chris1834 (talk) 22:46, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
- OK for your three links you sent me...#1 (the thread): This falls under a user editable site, which means anyone can post to it and thus not reliable, #2 (video review) This is exactly what you need. It is a reliable source independent of the subject of your article with a review of the subject of your article, #3 (game rules) a simple posting of the games rules is not notable for reference (it could be a good external link however). As for external links: I don't even look at them when reviewing. We are looking for references and external links are completely different. Basically they should be things that are...if you would like more info on this subject type of things. That is why the rules of the game would make a good external link. I hope this helps you out. Chris1834 (talk) 15:30, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
Your submission at AfC Whack & Slaughter was accepted
[edit]
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Chris1834 (talk) 13:28, 14 January 2014 (UTC)