User talk:Screendeemer

Welcome!

Hello, Screendeemer, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Robb Elementary School shooting did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Introduction tutorial
Contributing to Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Help pages
Simplified Manual of Style
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. BusterD (talk) 20:42, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Robb Elementary School shooting task force invitation

Hello! You seem to have an interest in the recent Robb Elementary School shooting, so I wanted to invite you to the new Robb Elementary School shooting Task Force, which I started from the WikiProject of Current Events. The task force’s goal is to improve any and all articles relating to the shooting . I hope you consider joining! Elijahandskip (talk) 20:43, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Shooting of Leonna Hale

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Shooting of Leonna Hale, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ASUKITE 23:20, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free version

Hi I am not confirmed on the English Wikipedia, as you likely are a low resolution version of the cover art (for What Is A Woman?) can be uploaded but only as non-free media on Wikipedia itself, not commons. A low res version can be found here. Sorry for the deletion requests they were going to happen eventually. --SunnyDays54 (talk) 08:44, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Georgia Guidestones bombing

The article Georgia Guidestones bombing has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Per WP:DELAY. There may well eventually be enough to support it's own article, but what is here now is either in the main article already, or could be a single sentence in the main article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fbifriday (talk) 20:43, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Georgia Guidestones bombing for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Georgia Guidestones bombing is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Georgia Guidestones bombing until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Fbifriday (talk) 20:50, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your consideration on proposing this article for deletion, though it is evident that it should warrant its own article as this is a sizeable attack against a historical monument. It warrants its own article due to this fact. Content will quickly be added as it is unfolding, if you are worried about it not being informative enough. Screendeemer (talk) 20:52, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 13:36, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

20 Democrats were arrested, yet you only added this to Ilhan Omar

Inquiring minds might wonder why.Doug Weller talk 13:39, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions - you haven't listed any

So that's useless, although you've had the American politics one. Doug Weller talk 16:13, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in gender-related disputes or controversies or in people associated with them. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 16:18, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Patriots in control" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Patriots in control and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 4#Patriots in control until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. MB 04:39, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Milked for laughs" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Milked for laughs and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 23#Milked for laughs until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 15:45, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Chris Chan (disambiguation) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chris Chan (disambiguation) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Chan (disambiguation) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

-- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 01:39, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Chris Chann

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Chris Chann requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 01:49, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Chris Chan (disambiguation)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Chris Chan (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either

disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 04:52, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Arbitration Enforcement noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a report involving you at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement regarding a possible violation of an Arbitration Committee decision. The thread is Screendeemer. Thank you. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 05:55, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Virgin with rage" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Virgin with rage and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 30#Virgin with rage until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 05:56, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Wikipedia’s Wikipedia article" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Wikipedia’s Wikipedia article and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 30#Wikipedia’s Wikipedia article until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 06:03, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Sonichu comic" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Sonichu comic and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 30#Sonichu comic until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 06:11, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022

Your account has been blocked indefinitely because it is suspected that it has been compromised. If your account is locked, please contact ca

wikimedia.org. Otherwise, if you are able to confirm that you are the user who created this account, please read the guide to appealing blocks (specifically this section), then add this below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.Bilby (talk) 11:52, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Per lock, LTA rather than compromised. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 21:34, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
No problem. A sudden change in behaviour could go either way, so I went with the more forgiving one. Sadly that wasn't the case. - Bilby (talk) 21:41, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Bilby: Oh absolutely, I do the same in such cases. Was just noting for the record. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 21:49, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

See also: AirFate (talk · contribs) and CertAuthor (talk · contribs). Johnuniq (talk) 01:38, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Wikipedia’s Wikipedia article" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Wikipedia’s Wikipedia article and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 28#Wikipedia’s Wikipedia article until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Elli (talk | contribs) 10:42, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]