User talk:Sebstr

Welcome!

Hello, Sebstr, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Diana Bambrough, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Otisjimmy1 (talk) 00:34, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Diana Bambrough[edit]

A tag has been placed on Diana Bambrough, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Otisjimmy1 (talk) 00:34, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Diana Bambrough[edit]

A tag has been placed on Diana Bambrough requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ttonyb1 (talk) 04:09, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Diana Bambrough[edit]

A tag has been placed on Diana Bambrough requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Verbal chat 11:23, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

PS: If you continually recreate this article you will probably be blocked. Please have a look at the wikipedia WP:TUTORIAL and wikipedia:Article development guides. Verbal chat 11:31, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Enlightenment (concept) — Own research?[edit]

I appreciate your effort to improve the article, but your revision isn't supported by references. Please read WP:OR. Simply adding links to other Wikipedia links doesn't count as references. Most of the Wikipedia links you've cited are not articles, but simply pages that link to other articles. The reader of your material is left to guess what is the correct reference. Also, when you link to other articles, link only the first occurrence, or the first time the linked article is most relevant.

All of these links from your revision are disambiguation lists. Their purpose is give a reader a choice of many articles. A reader should not have to guess which article is correct. None of these articles should be linked in your revision. For each of these, please select the one article that is relevant or find a good reference.

Other articles in your revision are incorrectly linked and will confuse the reader. For example, Train: a train is a connected series of vehicles that move along a track. This is not what you meant when you wrote "in order to train and discipline the mind." The By-product article is also not the article you intended as it refers to "a secondary or incidental product deriving from a manufacturing process, a chemical reaction or a biochemical pathway" and not the "the abilities and powers" that are gained through enlightenment.

Please find good references that support the material you're submitting. Please read A caution before citing Wikipedia and WP:VERIFY.

Mtd2006 (talk) 03:35, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]