User talk:Sid95Q/Archive 11

Archive 5

←

Archive 9

Archive 10

Archive 11

Leo 595 crore reference link is pointing to Salaar box office page, modify it and place appropriate link in Leo wiki page

Leo 595 crore reference link is pointing to Salaar box office page, modify it and place appropriate link in Leo wiki page. Jaggu5239 (talk) 09:12, 10 January 2024 (UTC)

Category:WWE Warrior Award recipients has been nominated for deletion

Category:WWE Warrior Award recipients has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. User:Namiba 00:44, 6 February 2024 (UTC)

Category:1980s Indian superhero films has been nominated for deletion

Category:1980s Indian superhero films has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Kailash29792 (talk) 08:45, 12 February 2024 (UTC)

"Zoran (Indian TV series" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Zoran (Indian TV series has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 13 § Zoran (Indian TV series until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 21:58, 13 February 2024 (UTC)

CfD nomination at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 February 22 § Indian superhero films by decade

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 February 22 § Indian superhero films by decade on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Kailash29792 (talk) 04:07, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

Removing the Link

Hey User:Sid95Q, I know you have removed an link which i had edited on the article The Great Maratha because it is not billed as an original series but it is acquired as this show was aired on DD National. Eventually, they had acquired some shows from this channel like The Sword of Tipu Sultan, Alif Laila and Shaktimaan. Both Alif Laila and Shaktimaan was aired on Dangal TV as Alif Laila show is available on Dangal Play app but Shaktimaan is not available in this app (because it is already available on JioCinema app and Youtube) as The Sword of Tipu Sultan and The Great Maratha is still streaming freely on this app. JudeinLenovo (talk) 19:58, 29 February 2024 (UTC)

Removing the Awards and nominations categories

Hey User:Sid95Q, I know you've removed a lot of category of awards-nominations link which I had added on this List of awards and nominations received by Sunny Deol, You have removed which is wrong. I agree that the reliable sources given in it may be incorrect which can be corrected but the awards given or nominated to the artist are absolutely correct. If you want, you can find the reliable source on the internet and mention it, I'm supporting you, but please don't delete the information given in this manner by asking for correct information through Wikipedia, people get to know incomplete things, so next time please don't do this. I' know you're master editor but don't put down new editors, help them. Don't try to put down the voices of new editors and I hope you will help new editors in the future as well. Sauravtheboy (talk) 20:52, 8 April 2024 (UTC)

@Sauravtheboy: First of all you are not a new editor, your account is 6 years old with over 700 edits and it is expected from an editor with this much experience to know about Wikipedia:Verifiability. Plus please read WP:NOTHERE and WP:NOTEVERYTHING. Sid95Q (talk) 21:01, 8 April 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:List of programmes broadcast by Star One

Hello, Sid95Q. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of programmes broadcast by Star One, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:05, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C

You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to other languages.

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

On behalf of the UCoC project team,

RamzyM (WMF) 23:10, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

Aman Gupta

If you have time, please remove extra citations from the Aman Gupta article, per WP:CITEOVERKILL. Ahmed Reza Khan (talk) 10:33, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:List of programmes broadcast by Star One

Hello, Sid95Q. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "List of programmes broadcast by Star One".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:23, 20 May 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Cultural depictions of Sachin Tendulkar

Hello Sid95Q,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Cultural depictions of Sachin Tendulkar for deletion in response to your request.

If you didn't intend to make such a request and don't want the article to be deleted, you can edit the page and remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

– Hilst [talk] 12:59, 31 May 2024 (UTC)

Pakdam Pakdai

Reliable sources apparently are impossible to find. I've tried and only ended up on other Wikis.   –Skywatcher68 (talk) 18:20, 6 June 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Golmaal Jr. for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Golmaal Jr. is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Golmaal Jr. until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

M S Hassan (talk) 13:44, 7 June 2024 (UTC)

Why did you revert my edit?

You reverted my edits 2 times without any explanation why? The edit i made removed a personal opinion passed off as fact using an opinion piece source. Knightmare2451 (talk) 22:07, 12 June 2024 (UTC)

@Knightmare2451: as explained before I revived references and sourced content. Please use article's talk page to explain your concerns. Plus see Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Film Sid95Q (talk) 22:13, 12 June 2024 (UTC)

I did just explain it to you that reversing the edit was wrong due to the fact that the sentence was a personal opinion not a fact. If you want you can keep the sources but the sentence is not true and removing it would be more neutral. Knightmare2451 (talk) 22:18, 12 June 2024 (UTC)

@Knightmare2451:, See Wikipedia:Consensus Sid95Q (talk) 22:20, 12 June 2024 (UTC)

Your edit at Sam Bahadur (film)

Hello. I have seen that you are trying to revert some of my edits in the mentioned article. I am the initial contributor of the article and trying to improve for GA. Please go through the GA review for failing reasons before you make up your mind for an edit. Twinkle1990 (talk) 16:48, 25 June 2024 (UTC)

Please read MOS:FILMCRITICS. You are review bombing article. It should be summarized, individual reviews should not be synthesized Sid95Q (talk) 16:51, 25 June 2024 (UTC)

@Twinkle1990: Sorry forgot to ping, in cas you are not following the page. Sid95Q (talk) 16:52, 25 June 2024 (UTC)

I am aware about MOS:FILMCRITICS and nowhere it says to limit reliable sources' review. You need to check the article's talk page first. If you want to contribute, do it for GA. Otherwise please don't start any edit war. Twinkle1990 (talk) 16:55, 25 June 2024 (UTC)

@Twinkle1990: I have not reverted your edits yet. Thank you for telling me about discussion. Will give my opinion there. Thanks Sid95Q (talk) 16:58, 25 June 2024 (UTC)

Please read the GA reviewer's suggestion "Critical reception again barely covers some three to four reviews. Such a movie would definitely have had much more reviews from film critics."

This film Jab Tak Hai Jaan page has more than 20 reviews and it's a GA. But ours isn't. Twinkle1990 (talk) 17:03, 25 June 2024 (UTC)

@Twinkle1990: it's not about number of reviews, it's about reviews should be summarized (see The Dark Knight). You are adding individual reviews without summarizing the section. Sid95Q (talk) 17:09, 25 June 2024 (UTC)

Rotten Tomatoes

Hello Sid95Q, I hope you're doing well. I'm curious to know how you got the average rating for the movie Wild Wild Punjab. I had never used the template in my creation. Thanks for your consideration. — C1K98V ^{(💬 ✒️ 📂)} 18:11, 12 July 2024 (UTC)

@C1K98V: I hope this link will be helpful, [1]. Regards Sid95Q (talk) 00:09, 13 July 2024 (UTC)

Reliability of 123telugu.com

Is 123telugu.com an unreliable source? Charliehdb (talk) 13:34, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

@Charliehdb: If your question is related to my edit on Bhimaa then I removed it because satellite rights and TV rights are not notable per WP:ICTFMOS, irrespective of the fact that they are supported by a reliable source or not. Sid95Q (talk) 13:41, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

Oh! Thanks for the information. Charliehdb (talk) 13:43, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

Reception - Tokyo Swindlers

Hello Sid95Q, I hope you're doing well. Is it allowed to include reviews from Metacritic, Rotten Tomatoes and Screen Rant if the rating is not available. Thanks for your consideration. C1K98V ^{(💬 ✒️ 📂)} 07:04, 26 July 2024 (UTC)

Hello @C1K98V:. In these cases, I usually add them in 'External links" section Sid95Q (talk) 07:08, 26 July 2024 (UTC)

Bhopal assembly

where on earth you see this front facade of Bhopal old and new assembly here in this link (https://mpvidhansabha.nic.in/vidhansabhabhawan.htm) in the climax of Shool ? The front facade and sitting Gandhi statue is in Hyderabad Assembly because both director and producer of the film are from Hyderabad. In the title cards there is thnaks card to Hyderabad Unit. The traffic was blocked for whole day in 1999 near Hyderabad in assembly in Nampally during the shoot of shool climax. Inside it was shot in Bhopal but that too is doubtful. And stop removing references which I have added, You are welcome to expand the production section. Do not mention where the film was shot in lead section. Ustadeditor2011 (talk) 11:22, 19 August 2024 (UTC)

@Ustadeditor2011: I have removed the unsourced content. But you are also removing other sourced content which is creating a problem. Sid95Q (talk) 11:29, 19 August 2024 (UTC)

I have updated specific unsourced content which you are worried about. Production details pls add in respective section and add ur references there. Pls note front facade where Manoj walks in and the gandhi statue and security gates are from Hyderabad Assembly not Bhopal. Inside it could be Bhopal.Ustadeditor2011 (talk) 11:37, 19 August 2024 (UTC)

@Ustadeditor2011: You have removed accolades table and per WP:FILMPLOT actors named should not be in Plot section, plus the line "Upon release, Shool recieved highly positive reviews" is WP:SYNTH because both reviews mentioned gave a mixed response. Sid95Q (talk) 11:41, 19 August 2024 (UTC)

Also, you have not cited any valid reason to remove disambiguation link and quotes from references. Sid95Q (talk) 11:44, 19 August 2024 (UTC)

3RR

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

Ustadeditor2011 (talk) 11:36, 19 August 2024 (UTC)

Hello. A few days ago there was a situation when you and another editor were reverting each other's edits to the article on Shool. It would have helped a lot if you had used used the article talk page (Talk:Shool) to explain why your edits made the article better.-- Toddy1 (talk) 06:50, 21 August 2024 (UTC)

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that some of your recent edits to Shool did not have edit summaries. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary (or the default undo summary), and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! -- Toddy1 (talk) 06:46, 21 August 2024 (UTC)