User talk:Sixtrojans

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome[edit]

Hello Sixtrojans and welcome to Wikipedia! I'm glad you've chosen to join us. This is a great project with lots of dedicated people, which might seem intimidating at times, but don't let anything discourage you. Be bold!, explore, and contribute. Try to be civil by following simple guidelines and signing your talk comments with ~~~~ but never forget that one of our central tenets is to ignore all rules.

If you want to learn more, Wikipedia:Tutorial is the place to go, but eventually the following links might also come in handy:
Help
FAQ
Glossary
Manual of Style

Float around until you find something that tickles your fancy. One easy way to do this is to hit the random page button in the navigation bar to the left. Additionally, the Community Portal offers a more structured way to become acquainted with the many great committees and groups that focus on specific tasks. My personal favorite stomping grounds are Wikipedia:Translation into English as well as the cleanup, welcoming, and counter-vandalism committees. Finally, the Wikimedia Foundation has several other wiki projects that you might enjoy. If you have any more questions, always feel free to ask me anything on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- Draeco 20:09, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Bridge_jesus.GIF[edit]

Please read more carefully before flagging something as a copyright violation. The fair use guidelines say a free copy of a graphic or a picture is preferred to using something off a web site directly. I am the author of the image in question. I released it to the public domain. It is clearly marked on its upload page with appropriate verbiage. It is a free copy of a image from the site mentioned so as (a) not to violate the copyright and (b) comply with fair use guidelines.

Thanks for your concern. I like to be sure Wikipedia endures, too, and not gets scuttled for a silly copyright infringement. — Kghusker 05:14, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your image substantially represents the same illustration that you copied--you did not create original artwork. --Sixtrojans 16:16, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Bbrighttempleton.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Bbrighttempleton.jpg. The image description page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 16:06, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Bigbreak.jpg[edit]

Replaceable fair use
Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Bigbreak.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Carl (CBM · talk) 17:45, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

We have issues it seems[edit]

I'm trying to make the Jesus film article better. Do you have a personal issue with me? It seems you do. GeorgeC (talk) 05:37, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, but I can't restore that article. Why? Well, for starters, because it was a word-for-word copy of this page! Thus, not only was it a shameless advertisement for the group, but a blatant violation of copyright as well! The organization may well be notable; but if it is, create a new article without the copyright violations and advertisements, and with solid evidence of notability from reliable sources not affiliated with CCC. --Orange Mike | Talk 20:38, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

See Talk:The King's College#Requested move. Cheers! --Aepoutre (talk) 18:42, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RE:LOST[edit]

Ha ha, no problem. Glad I can help. --HELLØ ŦHERE 03:00, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Userfying your WP:POT complaint about WP:AGF then your ABF complaint about "racially offensive" comments[edit]

Discussion moved to Hrafn Talk since my complaint was about the uncivil conduct of User:Hrafn.--Sixtrojans (talk) 01:58, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hrafn has deleted the comments from his talk page. Since it's my complaint about him, it doesn't really belong on my page. I've restored the discussion to an archived portion of the Christian Leadership Ministries talk page which seems to me like the next best home for them.--Sixtrojans (talk) 03:59, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

March 2009[edit]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary, as you forgot on your recent edit to Evangelicals and Catholics Together. Thank you. --Ericdn (talk) 14:20, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

September 2012[edit]

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you recently tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut and paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is needed for attribution and various other purposes. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Thank you. StAnselm (talk) 22:34, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article you want is now at Cru (Christian organization). Feel free to update it. StAnselm (talk) 03:26, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Billbright2.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Billbright2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 17:25, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:50, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Billbright2.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Billbright2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:25, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Bbrighttempleton.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bbrighttempleton.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:04, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]