User talk:Smmurphy/Archive3

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
User talk • Archives: 1 2 3 4


The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XL (June 2009)[edit]

The June 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:04, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLI (July 2009)[edit]

The July 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:05, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations open for the Military history WikiProject coordinator election[edit]

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on 12 September!
Many thanks,  Roger Davies talk 04:24, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLII (August 2009)[edit]

The August 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:14, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Military history coordinator elections: voting has started![edit]

Voting in the Military history WikiProject coordinator election has now started. The aim is to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of sixteen candidates. Please vote here by 23:59 (UTC) on 26 September!
For the coordinators,  Roger Davies talk 22:09, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLIII (September 2009)[edit]

The September 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:50, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As a member of the Military history WikiProject or World War I task force, you may be interested in competing in the Henry Allingham International Contest! The contest aims to improve article quality and member participation within the World War I task force. It will also be a step in preparing for Operation Great War Centennial, the project's commemorative effort for the World War I centenary.

If you would like to participate, please sign up by 11 November 2009, 00:00, when the first round is scheduled to begin! You can sign up here, read up on the rules here, and discuss the contest here!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 20:33, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLIV (October 2009)[edit]

The October 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 20:33, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs[edit]

Hello Smmurphy! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 4 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 941 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

  1. Al Jewer - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  2. Moses Brings Plenty - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  3. Paride Taban - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  4. Michael Collier (photographer) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 04:48, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article J-Rocc has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't meet WP:ATHLETE as he has not worked at the top level of the sport. No reliable third party sources to help establish notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nikki311 21:56, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the March 2010 Military history Project Coordinator elections now open![edit]

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on 8 March 2010! More information on coordinatorship may be found on the coordinator academy course and in the responsibilities section on the coordinator page.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:24, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Coordinator elections have opened![edit]

Voting for the Military history WikiProject coordinator elections has opened; all users are encouraged to participate in the elections. Voting will conclude 23:59 (UTC) on 28 March 2010.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:20, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer[edit]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 17:54, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Milhist election has started![edit]

The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has started. You are cordially invited to help pick fourteen new coordinators from a pool of twenty candidates. This time round, the term has increased from six to twelve months so it is doubly important that you have your say! Please cast your vote here no later than 23:59 (UTC) on Tuesday, 28 September 2010.

With many thanks in advance for your participation from the coordinator team,  Roger Davies talk 19:39, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference[edit]

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion, guidelines for use at WP:MINOR). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and all users will still be able to manually mark their edits as being minor in the usual way.

For well-established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 21:08, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Smmurphy. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

UOJComm (talk) 01:20, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article Michael Murphy (musician) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Poorly sourced BLP. No signifcant coverage found. No indication of meeting WP:NMUSIC.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Michig (talk) 14:39, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXVI, August 2011[edit]

To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. EdwardsBot (talk) 18:42, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXVII, September 2011[edit]

To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. EdwardsBot (talk) 02:48, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXVIII, October 2011[edit]

To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. EdwardsBot (talk) 08:47, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXIX, November 2011[edit]

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 21:09, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Military Historian of the Year[edit]

Nominations for the "Military Historian of the Year" for 2011 are now open. If you would like to nominate an editor for this award, please do so here. Voting will open on 22 January and run for seven days. Thanks! On behalf of the coordinators, Nick-D (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 00:29, 16 January 2012 (UTC) You were sent this message because you are a listed as a member of the Military history WikiProject.[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXX, January 2012[edit]

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 00:42, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXXI, February 2012[edit]

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 10:29, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

World Factoring Yearbook[edit]

I'm leaving this message as you're listed as a current participant of WikiProject Business. I was informed yesterday that the current World Factoring Yearbook (circa £150) is now free for download as an ebook. It's a matter of filling out this form. I'm not sure if you'll find this useful as a reliable source, but I thought I should let you know that it's freely available online. I apologise in advance if this doesn't interest you! All the best, The Cavalry (Message me) 15:14, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXXII, March 2012[edit]

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 02:40, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXXIII, April 2012[edit]

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 00:44, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXXIV, May 2012[edit]

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 15:26, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GOCE July 2012 Copy Edit Drive[edit]

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 19:28, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXXVI, July 2012[edit]

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 09:49, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Military history coordinator election[edit]

The Military history WikiProject has started its 2012 project coordinator election process, where we will select a team of coordinators to organize the project over the coming year. If you would like to be considered as a candidate, please submit your nomination by 14 September. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact one of the current coordinators on their talk page. This message was delivered here because you are a member of the Military history WikiProject. – Military history coordinators (about the projectwhat coordinators do) 09:54, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 10[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Billy Rich (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Bluegrass, Silvertone, John Simon, Conrad, Howard Johnson, Sambas and John McLaughlin

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:03, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Love history & culture? Get involved in WikiProject World Digital Library![edit]

World Digital Library Wikipedia Partnership - We need you!
Hi Smmurphy! I'm the Wikipedian In Residence at the World Digital Library, a project of the Library of Congress and UNESCO. I'm recruiting Wikipedians who are passionate about history & culture to participate in improving Wikipedia using the WDL's vast free online resources. Participants can earn our awesome WDL barnstar and help to disseminate free knowledge from over 100 libraries in 7 different languages. Please sign up to participate here. Thanks for editing Wikipedia and I look forward to working with you! SarahStierch (talk) 17:30, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Emmett Louis Murphy) has been reviewed![edit]

Thanks for creating Emmett Louis Murphy, Smmurphy!

Wikipedia editor Missionedit just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Great Job!

To reply, leave a comment on Missionedit's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Disambiguation link notification for September 16[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Emmett Louis Murphy, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Attorney, PTA and Municipal court (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:28, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Military history coordinator election[edit]

Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September! Kirill [talk] 16:17, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 19[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Robert Sanford, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Ashley River and Native American (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:25, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Bennie Khoapa requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. – S. Rich (talk) 06:11, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Military history coordinator election[edit]

Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September! Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 22:07, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the Military history Wikiproject's Historian and Newcomer of the Year Awards are now open![edit]

The Military history Wikiproject has opened nominations for the Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year. Nominations will be accepted until 13 December at 23:59 GMT, with voting to begin at 0:00 GMT 14 December. The voting will conclude on 21 December. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:41, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This message was accidentally sent using an incorrect mailing list, therefore this message is being resent using the correct list. As a result, some users may get this message twice; if so please discard. We apologize for the inconvenience.

Voting for the Military historian and Military newcomer of the year now open![edit]

Nominations for the military historian of the year and military newcomer of the year have now closed, and voting for the candidates has officially opened. All project members are invited to cast there votes for the Military historian and Military newcomer of the year candidates before the elections close at 23:59 December 21st. For the coordinators, TomStar81

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Robert Sanford source[edit]

What document is referred to in this statement from the article? "Sanford was born in England before 1642 and was mentioned as with his brother, William, in a document of that date, the older brother being between 5 and 10 (it isn't clear which brother was the elder)."

Good question, I'll try and find it. Smmurphy(Talk) 16:24, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Military history coordinator election[edit]

Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 29 September. Yours, Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 05:21, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Christianity Barnstar
Smmurphy, I award you The Christianity Barnstar for all your hard work in WikiProject Christianity related articles, especially your recent creation of the John Adams, Sr (Nebraska). Keep up the good work! Your efforts are making a difference here! With regards, AnupamTalk 01:30, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A brownie for you![edit]

Great article about the woman's hospital! Keep up the great work. :) Calaka (talk) 13:40, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Favor?[edit]

Could you please message me a list of the articles you've been creating about Omaha's African American leaders? I would like to feature what you've been doing on my North Omaha History Blog and share them with the North Omaha History Blog Facebook page. Also, I just want to keep up with you! I'm excited to see someone's kept working on this since I've mostly stopped! • Freechild | talk to me 20:05, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

For Omahans, in order, its been: legislator John Adams, Jr (Nebraska), legislator John Adams, Sr (Nebraska), legislator Johnny Owen (Nebraska), legislator John Andrew Singleton, legislator Aaron Manasses McMillan, Harrison J. Pinkett, Walter J. Singleton, and Millard F. Singleton. All worked as activists and all had incredible lives in and outside of the legislature (I'm sure you'll look at the articles, but a miniseries or multi-part documentary about these 8 people would not be believable).
After doing Pinkett, I did an associate of his who doesn't really have a connection to Omaha, Lafayette M. Hershaw (an Niagara Movement/NAACP founder). Millard F. Singleton was the father of John Andrew and the brother of Walter J. Owen was the only Democrat. The NAACP and WEB DuBois seemed especially influential in all of their lives. I thought about pulling all of the stories together into one of the articles about North Omaha History (African-American Civil Rights Movement in Omaha, Nebraska, African Americans in Omaha, Nebraska, or History of North Omaha, Nebraska), but I like writing biographical articles better, so I don't plan on doing it. I should try to at least find ways to link to the articles I'm writing in one or more of those existing articles, and I did try for the first couple articles, but then I realized that I don't have a big picture view of it, so I decided to wait to add more.
My conception is that I am talking about roughly two different generations, with Pinkett and Walter and Millard Singleton being the older generation and Adams, Jr, Owen, Singleton, and McMillan being the younger. Adams, Sr is sort of in both generations (being the age of the older figures but becoming a state legislator after the younger ones). The older generation tried to consolidate the political work of Ricketts but failed (Pinkett blamed Dennison, but I couldn't find anyone else who said so, so I didn't really weave that thread into the profiles). So instead they had to build a new foundation in north Omaha, a foundation that has continued through Adams, Sr's successor, Edward Danner, and to Chambers today. I'm not sure how accurate that is, though.
My most recent new article was about Nebraska's first female state senator, Mabel Gillespie. Gillespie, who was white, was elected out of Ord, but she lived in Omaha during WWI. I don't like to hate people, and writing about Gillespie made not hating people much easier because she wrote for the Omaha Bee in 1919, the year the Omaha Bee played a horrible role in the lynching of Willy Brown. That is, this amazing woman who did all of these amazing things may have played an important role on the wrong side of the one of the worst things to happen in Nebraska in the last 100 years. To be clear, I haven't looked for/at the Bee in the days leading up to the lynching, and I don't know if her byline or writing style is apparent in any of the offending articles. Also, she left the Bee in 1919, so she may have been off of the paper by then, I don't know. But I do find it appealing to humanize the staff at the Bee, even if I can't excuse some of the work they were doing.
I plan to continue writing a few more articles about pre-war Omaha figures. I have a list, but I might not get to them, I'm probably not going to write much in November but hopefully will start back up after. I don't plan on doing an article about Danner, as I really don't know much about the civil rights era and prefer to learn and write more about the earlier time. But Danner desperately needs an article (hint, hint).
Sorry for the long response, I just felt if you were thinking of these as a collection, I should give a bit of context.Smmurphy(Talk) 10:53, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This is tremendous, thank you, thank you! You know I started African-American Civil Rights Movement in Omaha, Nebraska, African Americans in Omaha, Nebraska, and History of North Omaha, Nebraska, right? I surely didn't have much context for doing those, but I still did. If you don't mind, I'll begin entering your analysis and articles into those articles. I am massively curious what your main source for these figures is though - where did you find the list, or did you cultivate it? And I would love to see the rest of your list - enticing! I'll also start on Danner soon. I don't know if you're local to North Omaha, but the community needs this info, and I'm finding that folks are hungry for it. I'll do anything I can to help move the people forward, and sharing history seems to be something I can do relatively easily. Thanks for helping me do it! • Freechild | talk to me 18:27, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I'm very aware that you did most of those articles. I think you remember, but we ran into each other a few times on wp a few years ago, I'm just coming back to the hobby now for some reason. My sources are almost completely old newspaper articles, mostly OWH, that I get from archives through a genealogybank.com account. If you have an Omaha Public Library card, Omaha newspaper archives are available through their site. I'll look up figures in google books and such, but the newspaper is usually more than enough. I try to cite a non OWH source at least once because I think that strengthens the notability argument. But I enjoy reading the old newspaper and magazine articles and find more than enough material that way. My list of future projects is just other people I read about in the articles I'd like to know more about. I'm afraid of showing you the list (which is in my userspace, here) because your blog posts are very good and I don't want to be scooped, so to speak (don't let that stop you, of course). I haven't read your post yet, but I know you just wrote about Dan Desdunes, who is on my list for sure. Smmurphy(Talk) 04:40, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I promise promise I won't scoop anything from your beautiful list - would it be okay if I filled in some blanks on WP, like putting in stubs for the newspapers, etc? What you've found here is astounding. What I will do for the blog is summarize what you've written here and point everyone to come and read your work. You really outdo yourself here, over and over. • Freechild | talk to me 17:43, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, I think I'm done with my project. There is a lot of copy-editing to do and smoothing for readability, but I've created all the articles I plan on doing for now. If you want a list, you can see the additions to your list of African Americans in Omaha here.Smmurphy(Talk) 06:50, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you - spectacular. You have taught me a lot here, and I will do my best share this info accurately. Two quick questions: I can't find anything on Vic Walker's death! You must've run into the same dead end? And second, have you already searched all the available images for those missing them? I assume as much, but want to make sure. Oh, and when I use these I'll cite you as User:Smmurphy, unless you tell me otherwise? Thanks again. • Freechild | talk to me 22:52, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't see anything about Walker's death in Nebraska or Colorado newspapers (on top of genealogy bank, I now have wikipedia library based access to newspapers.com), nor on any genealogy sites, but I didn't look very hard. He may well have moved away from Colorado in the 1920s, as it seemed his attempt to get into the newspaper business there was failing. I don't think I ever figured out who his children were, but perhaps he moved to wherever they were living. So, I wouldn't call it a dead end so much as I had so much material that I didn't try very hard to figure how the story ended. I might try again sometime. As for images, I tried to keep track of any pre-1923 images in those newspaper sources and add those. There are a few exceptions, for instance I used images from Rodolphe Desdune's Creole history book as well - the version in French is PD but not the translation and I have a pdf of the French version. I never contacted any Omaha museums, newspapers, or schools to ask about other images; I know they exist but it just isn't part of my process right now. For another example, The phototype of Ophelia Clenlans on her page is from 1901 in the OWH, but a copy of the photo on which it was based is in the Enterprise in 1896. The scans online of that paper aren't as clear as the phototype, so I used the phototype (both are on the wikimedia page [1]). I'm sure a good copy of the photo exists somewhere, maybe eventually it will be uploaded, who knows. as for my name, smmurphy is prefered, thank you. It isn't much of a secret and I'm sure someone could guess who I am, but as long as I don't have my full name in my wikipedia profile, I think my work here should be cited under my username if I am cited at all (and I'm flattered to be so). Keep in touch.Smmurphy(Talk) 09:45, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I was a month behind on your site and just caught up. Great job! I see some of my work in the African-American Newspapers post as well as the Vic Walker stuff. For the Vic Walker page, you skipped over his legal work and particularly his involvement in defense of sex workers - which is fine. I sometimes consider doing a bit more on wp about crime in Omaha in the 1800s, including sex work, but I'm not sure. I know there has been some scholarship on sex work in the old west recently, so I think it would pass WP:N, but it is a bit of an odd thing to do and is a bit further down my list - which has been on hold for a few months anyway. Smmurphy(Talk) 11:20, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:56, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the Military history WikiProject historian and newcomer of the year awards now open![edit]

On behalf of the Military history WikiProject's Coordinators, we would like to extend an invitation to nominate deserving editors for the 2015 Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year awards. The nomination period will run from 7 December to 23:59 13 December, with the election phase running from 14 December to 23:59 21 December. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:06, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia email re Newspapers.com signup[edit]

Hello, Smmurphy. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

HazelAB (talk) 15:19, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Sarah Helen Mahammitt) has been reviewed![edit]

Thanks for creating Sarah Helen Mahammitt, Smmurphy!

Wikipedia editor Vague just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Hi! I just wanted to give you some Kudos for these well written articles you've added to Wikipedia! There may need to be a little cleanup done, such as Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Linking but kudos to the great contribution!

To reply, leave a comment on Vague's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Thanks. Feel free to edit the pages, I appreciate your interest and help.Smmurphy(Talk) 14:44, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you![edit]

For great new article contributions! Yay! Thanks for all the writing you've done for these!

- [Vague] 03:28, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]