User talk:Smoneill

Image:BruBabalogo.gif listed for deletion

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as Image:BruBabalogo.gif has been listed for speedy deletion because you selected a copyright license type implying some type of restricted use, such as for non-commercial use only, or for educational use only or for use on Wikipedia by permission. While it might seem reasonable to assume that such files can be freely used on Wikipedia, a non-profit website, this is in fact not the case. Please do not upload any more files with these restrictions on them, because content on Wikipedia needs to be compatible with the GNU Free Documentation License, which allows anyone to use it for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial.

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it, but use the license {{GFDL-self}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If you have any questions please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you. Banyan Tree 14:32, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Rugby

Hi Smoneill, Nice work creating the Brussels club page. Be sure to check out the Rugby project, and please don't hesitate in adding or creating more articles on Belgium rugby, as at the moment there are not many at all (see Belgium national rugby union team). Cheers. Cvene64 02:30, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mat Hocken

Hi Smoneill, nice work on expanding this page.

The info box quotes Hull but this just goes to a dab page. Can you give some idication as to which article it should point to? There appears to be no Rugby Union team articles that relate to Hull only 2 Rugby League articles.

Keith D 12:55, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Luke Fitzgerald

Please do not remove AfD notices, see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. It was not a speedy delete tag and should not be removed. If you think the article should be kept then go to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luke Fitzgerald and let your thoughts be known, as I did. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 15:46, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WPRU Announcement template

Hey, I see you are a participant of Wikiproject Rugby Union. A template has been created {{WPRU Announcements}} for the project. It's function is to allow users to better communicate and co-ordinate tasks. Please consider placing it on your user page. Thanks. - Shudda ^talk 11:17, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Gay_Mitchell_MEP.JPG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Gay_Mitchell_MEP.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 22:39, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ahmad Black

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Ahmad Black, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 05:14, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Brusselsbabaslogo.gif

An image that you uploaded or altered, File:Brusselsbabaslogo.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 11:12, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Smoneill! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 3 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 242 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Oli Hockley - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Graeme Forbes - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Neil French (rugby union) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 23:44, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Graeme Forbes

The article Graeme Forbes has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Proposed deletion of Oli Hockley

The article Oli Hockley has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable, no sources found to verify this BLP

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mattg82 (talk) 23:04, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Neale28.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Neale28.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 03:40, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:2004-2005 squad.JPG listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:2004-2005 squad.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sreejith K (talk) 06:29, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Kevin Weaver

Hello Smoneill,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Kevin Weaver for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. St8fan (talk) 02:26, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:54, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of James Atkins (rugby union)

The article James Atkins (rugby union) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of subject meeting WP:GNG - hasn't been the subject of significant coverage in reliable sources. Fails the the relevant subject-specific notability guideline WP:NRU - hasn't played in a fully professional rugby competition or at international level for a tier 1 high performance union

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hack (talk) 03:05, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:LukeFitzgerald.jpg

The file File:LukeFitzgerald.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused (see WP:NOTWEBHOST), unclear purpose

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Zinclithium (talk) 06:27, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:LukeFitzgerald.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:LukeFitzgerald.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:55, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]