User talk:Softvision

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Contributions.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!

Triplets Paradox[edit]

Hi, concerning your edits on Twin paradox and Triplets Paradox, please have a very careful look at WP:NOR. DVdm (talk) 15:19, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

Reconciled - article deleted. Softvision (talk) 12:21, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

Deletion of Triplets Paradox[edit]

I interpreted your statement on the talk page of this article as a good faith deletion request, and have therefore tagged the article for speedy deletion per WP:CSD#G7. I hope you will continue to contribute positively to Wikipedia in the future. decltype (talk) 18:18, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

I confirm this. My intention is positive. Softvision (talk) 12:21, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

Triplets Paradox - User page[edit]

Article moved here : User:Softvision/Triplets Paradox

Discussion is welcome.

Softvision (talk) 17:17, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

I removed the section on Talk:Twin paradox linking to your Triplet Paradox. Please do not advertise your original research. Paradoctor (talk) 23:59, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

Your recent edits[edit]

Information.svg Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button Button sig.png located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 19:29, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

Preview instead of many small edits[edit]

Information.svgThank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. In the future, it is recommended that you use the preview button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, reduces edit conflicts, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Thank you. Dicklyon (talk) 02:51, 15 August 2009 (UTC)

I agree. OK. Thank you. Softvision (talk) 19:14, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

Your recent posts[edit]

You seem to be advocating for inclusion of original research here, and your posts to User talk:DVdm are bordering on harassment. I have to ask you to back off on both of these things, please.

Also, you've been asked before to take more care with previewing before you save so you don't flood the page history: please remember to do this. Thanks. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 02:40, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

As I wrote, these actions against my submissions are based on not understending the essence of my submissions and not understanding the importance of the content in these submissions. The only way to fight against not understanding is to explain, to teach, to learn and to extend knowledge. It is evident, that these actions against my submissions are subjective, and their intension is distinctly NOT to enable discussion and NOT to exhibit serious contradictions in informations published globally in specific Wikipedia articles. I consider this as a serious matter. If such state is actively supported, that represents degradation of specific Wikipedia content, controlled and censored by specific users. I do not think that this represents the Wikipedia comunity. This represents the user DVdm. Howgh. Softvision (talk) 11:26, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
Softvision, this is an encyclopedia. The point is not to "understand the essence of [your] submissions" -- it's to be able to WP:verify the information in them. If you're putting your own research into the articles, then whether or not it is accurate, it is not acceptable here. Also, you were asked to stay off DVdm's talk page. If you can't comply with this, then you'll need to be blocked. Please don't make this necessary. Thanks. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 12:33, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

Hello, Softvision. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by SarekOfVulcan (talkcontribs)

Softvision, if you continue to edit Wikipedia without responding to the complaint about you filed at WP:ANI#User Softvision on talk pages you may be blocked from editing. EdJohnston (talk) 16:16, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for leaving a note at WP:ANI, but it falls short of what we expect. To avoid further criticism, you should promise to:
  1. Follow our policies
  2. Pay attention to the views of other editors when advancing theories on Wikipedia that do not enjoy majority support in the outside world.
You are expected to negotiate to get support for your ideas, not just broadcast them to unwilling listeners without waiting for feedback. You are entering a place that already has rules, and you are expected to follow them. EdJohnston (talk) 20:52, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:Softvision/Triplets Paradox[edit]

User:Softvision/Triplets Paradox, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Softvision/Triplets Paradox and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Softvision/Triplets Paradox during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Elen of the Roads (talk) 21:53, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

Delete it. Softvision (talk) 22:09, 6 November 2009 (UTC)