Jump to content

User talk:SotirSoca

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!)

Hello, SotirSoca, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{Help me}} on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Please sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing four tildes (~~~~); our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.

We're so glad you're here! Meatsgains (talk) 21:03, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Permission requests

Many editors often wonder how to request permission to use an image they found somewhere, or a section of text from another source. Try using one of the permission request templates created specifically for this purpose so that you do not have to fuss with all the details.

To add this auto-updating template to your user page, use {{totd}}

Ways to improve IFFHS Top 200 European clubs of the 20th century

[edit]

Hi, I'm Domdeparis. SotirSoca, thanks for creating IFFHS Top 200 European clubs of the 20th century!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. please add a reference

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Domdeparis (talk) 16:39, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Branko Klenkovski has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Boleyn (talk) 12:30, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Red Star Belgrade former players columns

[edit]

Hello. Do you understand that with 5 columns most names are broken into 2 lines because in many devices there is no space for 5 columns and that makes the list visually look very unestethic? Besides, names being broken that way when less columns would fix the problem is preferable by Wikipedia principles and rules. Would yoyu be kind to revert yourself and restore 3 columns that fix the poblem? FkpCascais (talk) 11:53, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I see you didnt respond or fixed the problem. Names of players listed should not be broken into two lines, which is how it is displayed in most devices when 5 or 4 columns are added there. So 3 columns fixes that problem and it is the appropriate number of columns for that case. I am an over a decade-long football editor, so be sure me in personal life being a Partizan fan is completelly irrelevant, I changed from 5 to 3 columns as well when someone did that at Partizan article. I am here to comply with Wikipedia rules and principles and manual of style and I try to improve all articles regardless of my personal preferences. Regards, FkpCascais (talk) 12:23, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve 1999–2000 Red Star Belgrade season

[edit]

Hi, I'm Willsome429. SotirSoca, thanks for creating 1999–2000 Red Star Belgrade season!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. The page looks good, but more sources and readable prose would be better if possible.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Willsome429 (talk) 00:20, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Doubt

[edit]

Hi, I have a doubt about the goalkeeper Dragomir Racić. Racić or Račić? Thanks. --Zigurat (talk) 09:15, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

His correct surname is Racić. Best regards! SotirSoca (talk) 09:18, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Merges

[edit]

It has been suggested that the article Serbia and Montenegro national basketball team be merged with Serbia men's national basketball team. Maybe you want to discuss on it.--IndexAccount (talk) 11:37, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Rather than to revert, see {{Infobox Football club season}}. Your last edit doesn't agree to this pattern. The kit must be also. As well, you injured WP:ROLLBACK--Unikalinho (talk) 09:50, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Pozdrav

[edit]

Do not remove the semifinals of the Red Star in the 1991-92 championship in the Champions League, because the second-placed teams are counted as semifinalists. These are Sparta from Prague and Red Star. You are right on the Serbian version of FK Red Star and FK Sparta Prague and IFK Göteborg and Rangers 1992-93. Here is all semifinalist of European Cup and Champions League https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Cup_and_UEFA_Champions_League_records_and_statistics#By_semi-final_appearances_(European_Cup_and_UEFA_Champions_League) — Preceding unsigned comment added by VucoCar (talkcontribs) 21:20, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your explanation. Best regards! SotirSoca (talk) 22:29, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, SotirSoca. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Serbian spelling vs English spelling

[edit]

Hello SotirSoca, I noteced some of your recent edits at Red Star Belgrade in which you were pipping the names of people to show the Serbian spelling of the name, for exemple Milko Gjurovski to Milko Đurovski. I know you and some other editors have been doing this, but I must remind you that this encyclopedia is written for English-language readers, and it is important to have the names written in the way they write them. Exemple, don´t change Dan Tana to his proper name, because what matters is that English language speakers immeditelly associate that it is Dan Tana we are refering to. It is not relevant how he is known in Serbia. Don´t ever forget this is English-language Wikipedia written towards English-language speakers, if you want to write things in Serbian, then write the Serbian Wikipedia. Regards, FkpCascais (talk) 15:08, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I was just fixing redirects to certain pages, including Gjurovski brothers. Their surname has different spellings on English Wikipedia, Boško Gjurovski and Milko Djurovski. How is that possible? SotirSoca (talk) 16:00, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I saw you fixed some links, and you did them right (the pipping to say Đurovski is what is the problem). The Gjurovski brothers should both have the surname as Gjuovski. The rules are at Romanization of Macedonian. Unfortunatelly, Macedonians changed their romanization to a different way, previously their romanization was to write the names in Serbo-Croatian Latin. Now they do it as Bulgarian does. English language followed that rule because English, unless has a proper English name (for exemple Red Star Belgrade for FK Crvena zvezda) uses the way local names are written in local way using the rules of romanization of the language when some language is written in other alphabet that not Latin. I will see now the case of Gjurovskis. FkpCascais (talk) 16:26, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
OK, this is what happened. Initially, like 10 years ago, both articles had the title as Djurovski. That is because back then the official romanziation of Macedonian was to write it in Serbo-Croatian Latin. But somewhere later the Macedonian governament changed that and issued a decree on how romanization of Macedonian should be done (VMRO basically changed it to Bulgarian way except few cases Macedonian is different, like this case of the Ѓ´s). English language follows each language rules, so adopted that as well. Macedonian editors changed the titles accordingly, but at Milko Gjurovski case, that spelling was already a redirect. When that happends, only an administrator can move the page to a new title, and until today nobody had the time to ask some admin to do it. Boško Djuovski by the way should be Boshko Gjurovski. Me personally, I don´t favour this, I think is stupid as hell, they should have kept using Serbo-Croatian Latin, but unfortunatelly the reality is this one. FkpCascais (talk) 16:40, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Super Cup of Yugoslavia, Summer Champions League, League Cup

[edit]

Thanks man for your work on Supercups in YU football. Ustedeo si mi vreme. Nice job. See ya.

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi SotirSoca. Could you please help with this. Not sure about it. --IndexAccount (talk) 07:05, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:52, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Capitalization of 'Zvezda'

[edit]

Hello,

Can I ask you for your reasoning as to why you have removed the capitalization of the word 'Zvezda' in the team title 'Crvena Zvezda'?

It doesn't make sense to me, and I have a feeling that it may actually be incorrect grammar-wise. I believe that the whole team title of 'Crvena Zvezda' should be capitalized. Look forward to hearing back from you. Cheers. Docholliday11 (talk) 12:05, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The correct name of the club in Serbian is Crvena zvezda. The word 'zvezda' is not capitalized in this case, it's capitalized only if we just say Zvezda which is the club's nickname. Cheers. SotirSoca (talk) 10:20, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Red Star Belgrade in European football

[edit]

Izvini ali neki izgleda Hrvat 91.191.37.22 je unistio ovu gore stranicu u naslovu "Red Star Belgrade in European football" i sve izmenjao. Nema vise ni one trake srebrne za finala i zlatne za osvojen trofej.

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article IFFHS Top 200 European clubs of the 20th century is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IFFHS Top 200 European clubs of the 20th century until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Joseph2302 (talk) 15:58, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The greatest success since 1992

[edit]

Why is the placement among the 32 best teams in the Europa League is a greater success than the placement among the 16 teams in the UEFA Cup Winners' Cup? I think that if Zvezda biggest successes after 1992 are the group stage of the Champions League and the knockout phase among 32 teams in the Europa League, it must also be in the round of 16 of the Cup Winners' Cup 1996/97. — Preceding unsigned comment added by VucoCar (talkcontribs) 13:06, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Players' statistics in Yugoslav Cup

[edit]

Hello, I tried to find statistics of Crvena zvezda players in Yugoslav Cup for the article about Robert Prosinecki but failed. In 2018 you add statistics in this article for the whole squad. If you remember the source, can you share it with me? Big thanks! Илья Яковлев (talk) 18:13, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, my source was a forum of Red Star fans where they posted newspaper articles for every match and it was mostly my own research. Unfortunately, that forum doesn't exist anymore but I can give you another source where you can find statistics for every cup that Red Star managed to win. However, I found out that there are some mistakes in those lists. Best regards! SotirSoca (talk) 14:06, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

KK CZ

[edit]

Template:KK Crvena zvezda sidebar has been nominated for deletion. Could you comment on the discussion. DragonFederal (talk) 13:50, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]