Jump to content

User talk:Spanishwine1965

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation

[edit]
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. However, the reviewer felt that a few things need to be fixed before it is accepted. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:submit}} to the top of the article.)
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Kevin Rutherford (talk) 08:19, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

[edit]
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. However, the reviewer felt that a few things need to be fixed before it is accepted. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:submit}} to the top of the article.)
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Kevin Rutherford (talk) 06:24, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In response to your feedback

[edit]

"He is considered by many museum professionals and private collectors to be amongst some of the most important contemporary ceramic artists of our time." Does that come from a independent, secondary, verifiable source???? See WP:42. Cite it as a reference.

Ariconte (talk) 23:52, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 

In response to your feedback

[edit]

Yes, people are truly reading what you submit. Wikipedia has guidelines for articles. Read here and here.

Abigail was here :D Talk to Me. Email Me. 14:45, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 

Your submission at Articles for creation

[edit]
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. However, the reviewer felt that a few things need to be fixed before it is accepted. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:submit}} to the top of the article.)
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! mabdul 14:08, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

To demonstrate that Serna is worthy of a WP article, we need proof he has been widely noticed and reported in reliable, independent sources e.g. newspapers, magazines. Alternatively, you may be able to show proof that he meets the requirements of WP:ARTIST. Sionk (talk) 14:39, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

[edit]
Jacobo de la Serna, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Chiswick Chap (talk) 09:43, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Jacobo de la Serna - what still needs doing

[edit]

Hi Spanishwine1965, I have spent a while copy-editing, adding wiki links to other articles, adding images and generally making the article look presentable - and crucially I have asserted notability. The article still has defects - raw http:// links without descriptions, and most importantly several paragraphs without citations/references - if you could possibly add some of those, that would be very helpful! It would also be nice to have a few more images of the artworks, and ideally more detail of when the books were published. Oh, and the titles of the magazine articles, or people will start to complain! All the best Chiswick Chap (talk) 10:11, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Update: we urgently need citations for the Exhibits/Permanent Collections, in principle for each one of them (not just general links to museum websites, but proof de la Serna was exhibited at each place). A list of such things on de la Serna's own website (is there one?) would be a start. Chiswick Chap (talk) 11:26, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Totally agree. I'm a member of the Visual Arts Project (and AfC), so not unsympathetic. There is a list of magazine and book coverage in the article - it would be great if these sources could be incorporated into the article, because they are certainly reliable and independent (unlike most gallery websites and blogs). Currently the article is very poorly sourced. Please remember also to give a reliable citation for any private personal information, such as full dates of birth. Sionk (talk) 11:41, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]