User talk:StarSpangledKiwi

Archives

Spangled 2006 Spangled 2007

.

Empire State University

Hi StarSpangledKiwi. It's no big deal, but I'm confused as to why you reverted my edit to Empire State University (fictional). [1] I had thought that it would be more useful to specify the appropriate notability guideline (in this case, fiction) than to point to the generic guideline. Am I missing something? --GentlemanGhost (talk) 02:07, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Destiny

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Destiny (Marvel Comics), you will be blocked from editing. Scottandrewhutchins (talk) 19:33, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The two Destinies have nothing to do with one another aside from being Marvel Comics characters and you had no business merging them. It has been discussed before and this is the second time someone has reverted the change. If you will see from the discussion, the consensus was that they belong on different pages. --Scottandrewhutchins (talk) 19:33, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. However, they were separated fairly recently. I wasn't even on Wikipedia two years ago and I voted for it. I was the one who added the personification. I'll go fix The Destine page.--Scottandrewhutchins (talk) 20:07, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tower Insurance

Do you work for Tower since we are have the same IP address at the mo. StarSpangledKiwi (talk) 19:51, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No, I do not. Don't know how we ended up with the same IP address. 204.153.84.10 (talk) 19:55, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Windshear (comics)

I'm not sure what you meant by "Eventually, the Canadian government disbanded and Hume returned to England," but I doubt you meant that statement the way it sounds. :) 204.153.84.10 (talk) 16:36, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comics Articles for Deletion

One or more articles you’ve been involved in editing (Melter, Ringer (comics), Ego the Living Planet, or others including Marlene Alraune) has been nominated for deletion. If you feel you can make contributions to the article to improve it and make it worth keeping, please do so. BOZ (talk) 16:01, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An article you've been involved in editing, Crimson Daffodil has been nominated for deletion. If you feel you can make contributions to the article to improve it and make it worth keeping, please do so. BOZ (talk) 14:30, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Also, Mathemanic is up for deletion, if you can do anything to help that one. BOZ (talk) 00:24, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Deviants

FYI, I see you've been fixing up lists of comics characters - Deviant (comics) has a big list of Deviants that you might want to work your way towards eventually. :) 207.229.140.148 (talk) 02:11, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Also, Attilan has a huge list of Inhumans - not entirely sure why, probably needs a separate list page since there are so many. :) (Except for the fact that there'd be little left on the page, I guess!) 207.229.140.148 (talk) 02:32, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nice work, by the way! You may also want to check out Kree#Notable Kree at some point. 207.229.140.148 (talk) 23:52, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If I spot any more articles with character lists, I sure will let you know! You've done excellent work sourcing and expanding them. 207.229.140.148 (talk) 00:50, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent as always! :) I guess it wouldn't surprise you that there is also Skrull#Notable Skrulls, Homo mermanus#Known Atlanteans, or Vampire (Marvel Comics)#Known Vampires would it? :) 207.229.140.148 (talk) 04:30, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! There's also Secret Empire. 67.162.109.200 (talk) 00:27, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And New Men (Marvel Comics). 67.162.108.96 (talk) 02:17, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bran Bardic

Can you direct me to where inOfficial Handbook of the Marvel Universe A-Z Hardcover #2 where it mention Bran Bardic cus for the life of me i cant find it. Im looking in the second issue "Benny Beckley to Crazy Eight". --- Paulley (talk) 19:08, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you StarSpangledKiwi, that'll help loads.. we are really trying to have a complete clean over of the Corps and some of its related articles and this will be extremely helpful.. now i just gotta see if i can get a hold of it somewhere. Thanks again. --- Paulley (talk) 20:37, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Im having difficulty getting hold of a copy of the book... could you do me a favor and move up and Captain that it notes in the entry as being former from the unconfirmed list to the former list... if you move them the way they are i will get back and put them in the table. Anyway thanxs in advanced. --- Paulley (talk) 20:39, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

oooh thanxs, i take it that this handbook set after the end of X-Men: Die By The Sword as Albion's on the list. However, 616 Brian Braddock stated in CB & MI: 13 #1 that he is no long part of any Corps. So i guess that's a mistake on Marvel's part. Anyway thanxs for the list, it a good base to work with til their next appearance. We will look into any additional notes later no rush im sure we can condense and reword them easily enough. --- Paulley (talk) 15:57, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Original Moonstone

I've added a discussion regarding the creators. Where did you get the information about Lee and Kirby creating Moonstone? Patchwor (talk) 07:41, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of What to Do?

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article What to Do?, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. justinfr (talk/contribs) 13:44, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem

Thanks for your uploads. You've indicated that the following images are being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why they meet Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page an image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --14:34, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome back!

Glad to see you. :) Happy New Year! BOZ (talk) 00:37, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Good deal, have fun. :) BOZ (talk) 00:42, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of IceTV Good

I have nominated IceTV Good, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IceTV Good. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Many otters • One hammer • HELP)} 15:43, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I added Ice TV (soundtrack) into the above nomination.-gadfium 04:02, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats!

		The New Zealand Barnstar of National Merit
		Good work on everything... kiwiteen123 (talk) 04:12, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
		_{this WikiAward was given to StarSpangledKiwi by kiwiteen123 (talk) on 04:12, 26 October 2009 (UTC)}[reply]

Spider Society

Hi StarSpangledKiwi - It looks like you posted the edits to the Spider Society where full names were given to Mr. Sanderson, Nina, and Phil. Can you tell me where the names Leroy Sanderson, Nina Tanner, and Phil McGrath came from? Particletracker (talk) 15:31, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I went ahead and corrected the names I previously mentioned as per the Official Handbook #11 (2009) Particletracker (talk) 03:41, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Whitetrash-steriogram.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Whitetrash-steriogram.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 07:00, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Heybabykangaroojack.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Heybabykangaroojack.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.

I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.

If you recieved this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.

To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 14:05, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Heybabyworldcup.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Heybabyworldcup.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.

I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.

If you received this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.

To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 17:52, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Steriogram-go.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Steriogram-go.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 03:34, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Toy Love EP

The article Toy Love EP has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for reliable, secondary sources reveals an insufficient amount of significant coverage. This article fails Wikipedia's notability guidelines for albums.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Neelix (talk) 21:02, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Cuts (album)

The article Cuts (album) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for reliable, secondary sources reveals an insufficient amount of significant coverage. This article fails Wikipedia's notability guidelines for albums.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Neelix (talk) 23:50, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Toy Love (album)

The article Toy Love (album) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for reliable, secondary sources reveals an insufficient amount of significant coverage. This article fails Wikipedia's notability guidelines for albums.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Neelix (talk) 20:53, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Caterwauling (album)

The article Caterwauling (album) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not a notable release as required by WP:NALBUMS and WP:GNG.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mattg82 (talk) 01:38, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Black Spectre for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Black Spectre is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Black Spectre until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.--Crazy runner (talk) 14:53, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dance Stamina

The article Dance Stamina has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No references, no claim of notability, fails WP:GNG and WP:NSONGS.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richhoncho (talk) 10:30, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Freak the Sheep Vol. 2

The article Freak the Sheep Vol. 2 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced since 2006, this is an unremarkable non notable compilation, just put together to make money

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Gbawden (talk) 08:46, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Very Best of Kiwi Country for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Very Best of Kiwi Country is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Very Best of Kiwi Country until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Angry Bald English Villian Man Chat 20:45, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:20, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Wakandans has been nominated for discussion

Category:Wakandans, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Killer Moff (talk) 15:47, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Lou-onlyyou.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Lou-onlyyou.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:57, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Best of Wildside for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Best of Wildside is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Best of Wildside (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 03:41, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Oneoftwothings.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Oneoftwothings.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:36, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Warratahs-collection.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Warratahs-collection.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:43, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ultras (comics)

The article Ultras (comics) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Extremely minor topic that fails GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TTN (talk) 14:15, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Hellosailor.pacificaamour.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Hellosailor.pacificaamour.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:37, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Request for feedback on the List of X-Men members talk page

If you have time, your feedback is requested on the List of X-Men members talk page in the section about Other Status, X-Corporation, etc. We have massive sections of the page being removed, including things that have been debated and compromised on in the past, instead of being taken to the talk page first. Your thoughts would be appreciated. DeadpoolRP (talk) 15:03, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ghostclubbing for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ghostclubbing is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ghostclubbing until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 15:38, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Come to Nothing

The article Come to Nothing has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Tagged as unsourced since 2007; merge to Dreams (Evermore album)?

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Another Believer _(Talk) 03:57, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Gettingolder.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Gettingolder.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:19, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]