User talk:Starblind/2009

Locking of Battledawn

It appears that you locked the page Battledawn due to previous bad creations. I wish to create an informative page about this subject and would like it unlocked. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by YanivPeer (talk • contribs) 15:12, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

• Given the really bad history of that article, I would suggest making a very well-sourced draft article, using only reliable sources. That's the only way it would possible stand a chance at passing a DRV vote. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 20:23, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

I hate you because you deleted my Ramblecs page... —Preceding unsigned comment added by TheHerminator11 (talk • contribs) 18:06, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

Deletion of Nathanial Carter

Thanks for deleting this article, Friend. I found this site stealing an article from my web site; so, I wanted to test the ease of writing misinformation. Guess you passed that test, and, I totally agree with your deletion statement: This actor will never be of enough interest for a site like this... so, please keep my name and related information from appearing here again! Ban it permanently!!! Thank you for your co-operation... Best of Wishes, Nathanial Carter. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.0.183.240 (talk) 15:46, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

• What you're asking for is called article protection, which would prevent an article under that title from being created indefinitely, but it's usually not a good idea to protect common names as chances are there's someone else of that name who might have an article eventually. For example, a quick Google Books search for "Nathanial Carter" shows that was the name of one of the first black pastors in the US, and that could certainly be an article. However, per your request I will add the article to my watchlist and delete it if it comes back in its former incarnation. Hopefully this will suffice. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 15:53, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

Deletion of Dolphin Code (refers to different code)

Sir, I believe the version of Dolphin Code that was previously deleted (per discussion for copyright violation) refered to a different "Dolphin Code." The one I'm referring to is public domain. Do you recommend I resubmit under a different title? Riggsdr (talk) 21:18, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

• Response on my talk page. 87.22.70.107 (talk) 21:06, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
• 2nd Response posted, thanks! Riggsdr (talk) 18:58, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

LOVED YOUR ARTICLE

I loved your article: User:Starblind/DeletionWars I think I am going to post a link to it on other pages, other editors should read this article. Have you considered updating the article for 2009? maybe a brief paragraph?

What was the article which Jimbo put up for deletion? travb (talk) 09:17, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

Deletion of Youtube Poop...

I believe that the article mentioned above was wrongly deleted. I would very much appreciate you reconsidering this move.JIMfoamy1 (talk) 21:43, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

Odyssey Con

Hi. I happened to randomly come across another Sci Fi conference that appears to be non-notable and nominated it for deletion. Unlike the deletion discussion for MatsuriCon, this one was contested immediately. I don't know if you have a view on this conference, or if if you find the logic for the keep !vote persuasive, but you may wish to add your views to the AfD. Rgds, Bongomatic 03:39, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

Comanche Stallion

You found a great interview... but Harry specifically spoke about CS being his last HERE and again in an interview HERE. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 21:22, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

Hoax units of measure

• Beard-second (AfD discussion)
• The Dave (AfD discussion)

There's a parallel here, alas. Uncle G (talk) 18:48, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

GorillaThrill

you know, i was gonna ask why you deleted my page without even explaining it to me first like a reasonable person, but apparently there's a million other people on here upset about the same thing. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Petwar83 (talk • contribs) 16:12, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

• Yeah, it's been deleted 9 times in less than a year as non-notable web content, and is now protected. It's pretty unlikely that it's ever coming back. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 16:29, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

Problems with Angel Taormina

Hello Andrew, Could you please take a look at the AfD discussion, especially the most recent comments. It's now pretty clear the article was created as a subtle attack page. The subject's father and manager is most upset. Is there any way this AfD can be closed early and preferably courtesy blanked? I've asked for assistance at Biographies of living persons noticeboard, but in my experience reports can get lost in the shuffle unless they pertain to famous people. Best, Voceditenore (talk) 07:20, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

• Hi, under Wikipedia guidelines it would be generally inappropriate for me to close a debate that I participated in. It's definitely headed for an inevitable deletion though and it would probably be best to just wait a couple days for it to close naturally. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 14:30, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

AbsoluteTelnet DRV

Andrew, I was wondering if you could have a second look at Wikipedia:DRV#AbsoluteTelnet. After your comments, there has been additional discussion, including citation of additional sources that may be enough for you to at least consider a relist vote for this article. If you have the time, I'd really appreciate a second glance.

Regards,

--Brian Pence (talk) 20:43, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

The Newtones

I'm pretty sure that following Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Newtones the article was not eligible for speedy deletion, even if the discussion was a bit brief. Regards, Guest9999 (talk) 12:27, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

Request for comment

Hi Starblind. Per the stipulations at WP:CANVASSING, I've pinged your talk page to "appropriately canvass" you wrt the deletion discussion currently taking place at "WP:Articles for deletion/Home and family blog." (Note that I've also pinged the talkpages of all of your fellow participants at last years deletion discussion at "WP:Articles for deletion/List of blogs," to ensure that my notifications are to are small number of wiki-contributors that have been neutrally selected.) I hope you'll consider taking part in our discussion. Thanks. ↜Just me, here, now … 07:28, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

Deletion review for The Newtones

An editor has asked for a deletion review of The Newtones. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Guest9999 (talk) 18:03, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you for your comments at the M*A*S*H* episodes listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Television.

in case you are not watching these pages, just to let you know there has been a response to all of your comments. Ikip (talk) 17:40, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

MASH

• Don't forget to express your opinion one way or the other at all the List_of_M*A*S*H_episodes_(Season_1). Every episode has been nominated individually and there is only a few days left for the comments period to remain open. Even the pilot is up for deletion, and it was nominated for multiple awards. Your opinion one way or the other will determine if the nominator moves on to season two, and starts the process again. 24 episodes are up for deletion, some don't have full plot summaries added yet, but the vote determines whether the episodes have the right to exist to be expanded upon later. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 06:44, 16 May 2009 (UTC)

Ramblecs

Starblind deleted my page that I made about Ramblecs. I have the right to rant while i am wasting time at school....stop being a meanie. —Preceding unsigned comment added by TheHerminator11 (talk • contribs) 18:10, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

Invitation to participate in SecurePoll feedback and workshop

As you participated in the recent Audit Subcommittee election, or in one of two requests for comment that relate to the use of SecurePoll for elections on this project, you are invited to participate in the SecurePoll feedback and workshop. Your comments, suggestions and observations are welcome.

For the Arbitration Committee,
Risker (talk) 08:34, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

Louis Lesser

Starblind. I am a new editor. The questions you raise regarding Louis Lesser are reasonable. If EVERYTHING I wrote in the article is true, a better question to ask would be, why did your search, AND MY OWN ORIGINAL SEARCHES, turn up nothing? If everything I wrote about 93 year old Louis Lesser, and the massive tragedy that is his story about how Warren Buffet and Kirk Kirkorian's mentor, the guy who was Hughes Aircraft landlord, and the guy who stormed into JFK's White House Office and walked out partners with JFK (and the Shah of Iran, Ferdinand Marcos, Donald Trump, etc.). Questions you raised are good, but better ones, which you WILL raise when you find everything I wrote was true, is WHY WAS LESSER ERASED FROM HISTORY, including from Las Vegas? I will give you my email address, and send you real, historic documents, if you will agree to write the correct history of Louis Lesser on Wikipedia, AND KEEP IT FROM BEING ERASED AGAIN. I am a new editor, and you seem to be experienced. If I am not a nut, and if everything I wrote is true, you will have the same questions I have, what happened to the real history. I have some idea what happened, since Louis Lesser appears to have had $15 BILLION stolen from him, just recently, and is now penniless. And that is just the tip of a very weird iceberg of history, which I could use the help of skeptics in uncovering, and putting a real history on Wikipedia. HkFnsNGA (talk) 20:30, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

• So, in other words, he did all this great world-class stuff and became one of the world's 20 richest people, yet by some bizarre conspiracy involving apparently all the newspapers of the world, the government, and everybody who ever wrote a book about Las Vegas, the whole world FORGOT TO WRITE ANY OF THAT DOWN?! You have to admit this is a really tough one to swallow. But let's assume, just for a moment, that everything you just wrote is completely true as written... even then, Wikipedia would STILL not be the place to put it until all this is documented in reliable sources. Wikipedia is not a place for original research (see WP:NOR, WP:V, and WP:RS, for a start. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 21:27, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

I posted the SEC findings on Lou's $1.5 Billion when he left Louis Lesser Enterprises in 1982. You can check it. I put a "construction" tag at the top of the article, but someone tried to delete it before I could do anything more. I am a volunteer who reads to and helps senior citizens, and that is my sources. The SEC finding in the Tri National bankrucy report verifies the $1.5 Billion. I poasted a link with HUNDREDS of headline stories just on Louis Lesser Enterprises. I have now scanned the list of his assets in 1963. How do I post them. I believe you will change your mind when you see it. HkFnsNGA (talk) 04:35, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

Even setting aside the obvious silliness of that story, you contradict yourself once again: if he was supposedly born in 1916 as the article claims, he would have been 83 around 1999, by which time the Trump Taj Mahal had been (rather famously) operating for nearly a decade. And Donald Trump's dad, Fred Trump never lived to age 94, either. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 21:39, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

Starblind, this is the first thing, in this entire page of name calling, that anyone has said that does not check out with Louis Lesser's story, if what you say is true. That is the story Louis Lesser told me. I did not put it in the article, since I do not have any confirmation beyond what Louis Lesser told me. I will ask him about it. I did NOT put it in the article, as you can check, since I just have the story from Mr Lesser, and no independent sourse. I am sure, however, that Lesser sold Trump the two parcels in Atlantic City, since I saw the info on paper. And Lesser told me he "showed Buffet and Kerkorian things, but OTHERS told me he was their mentor. This "mentor" word is also on a report to the LAPD police commission, and a recent report to the US prosector Robinson in LA. How do I upload the Annual Report? HkFnsNGA (talk) 04:37, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

Julian Barry

Thank you very much for noticing. I try.Jarhed (talk) 18:53, 29 December 2009 (UTC)