User talk:Stavros Triandafylides

Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!)

Hello, Stavros Triandafylides, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{Help me}} on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Please sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing four tildes (~~~~); our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.

We're so glad you're here! Meatsgains (talk) 03:22, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Stavros Triandafylides. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the article Truce Sport, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. Editing for the purpose of advertising or promotion is not permitted. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 03:31, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Truce Sport

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Truce Sport requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. —C.Fred (talk) 03:41, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Truce Sport

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Truce Sport requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Whispe ring 05:50, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —Cryptic 18:22, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Cryptic, I really appreciate your hard work and quick response. Being careful and critical is very important for the encyclopedic community. I would like to apologize for any inconvenience that I may have created without my willingness. As I requested in my previous message, there is a mistake and you unfairly accused me with block. I appeal for unblocking and I request an analytic response of your critical opinion on WHY you believe that is advertising and promotion a sport NPO that exposes the inconvenient truths and civil right through the social change platform of sport? I would really appreciate contacting someone that supervised you and can claim that you have the right to block appropriate encyclopedic knowledge. Thank you.

I am looking forward to hearing from you at your earliest convenience.

I'm willing to unblock you only if you'll commit to entirely cease editing articles about yourself, your relatives, and your companies. You're clearly either incapable or unwilling to write about them in a neutral manner. In particular, while the sort of claims you made in Truce Sport can be waved away as the usual advertising hyperbole somewhere like Facebook or a press release outlet, they're actively deceptive in an encyclopedia. I gave you the proper route of appeal in response to your inquiry on my talk page; it was your choice to ignore that and simply repost the article again. This is the consequence.

Your route of appeal for the block is given in the box above: write {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} on this page, and another volunteer will take a look. The route of appeal for the deletion remains WP:Deletion review. —Cryptic 20:05, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your response and I really appreciate your understanding. i was totally unaware that you provided me the appeal in response to my inquiry. I honestly did not ignore it at all. I misread and I misunderstood. This was my mistake, and I would never have the intention to mislead information relate to myself. Accordingly, I pledge that I will cease editing related to me articles, so other volunteers randomly can have th eoption voluntarily to contribute and enhance, add or change these articles. I am a passionate individual towards writing and contributing to knowledge and encyclopedia. I read a lot, I use appropriate and important sources and references and I am willing to contribute only positively to Wikipedia. I would really appreciate your understanding and accept my apologies. I am looking forward to hearing from you and if you wish to asvise me on appealing the block. Thank you. Please find attached my unblock appeal.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Stavros Triandafylides (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I commit and pledge to cease editing articles about myself, my relatives, and my companies. I would really appreciate your understanding. I apologize for any incovenience I created.

Accept reason:

Unblocked by blocking admin. —Cryptic 14:34, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I really appreciate your understanding.

Just to confirm - you understand that this topic ban would include every edit you've made so far, and that violating it would, per our policy on conditional unblocking, would be grounds for any administrator to immediately reimpose the block? —Cryptic 21:24, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your notice. Yes,I read the policies and I confirm that I agree with your words. Thank you and I really appreciate the second opportunity that you provided me to become again an editor of wikipedia articles. I pledge that my contribution wil be on the highest quality and only beneficial for Wikipedia. Much apperciation. Looking forward to unblock.

Very well. I've unblocked.

A topic ban normally forbids you from making drafts of pages, or even discussing them. I'm loosening that here, since you're a new user: you may edit drafts (e.g. Draft:Stavros Triantafyllidis, Draft:Truce Sports) and discussion pages (e.g. Talk:DeRosan), but not edit articles (such as DeRosan or Stavros Triantafyllidis) once they've been published into the main namespace. Per our guidelines on conflicts of interest, you shouldn't have been doing that anyway; this just formalizes it. —Cryptic 14:34, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Cryptic, I really appreicate your understanding. I honestly misunderstood the rules and almost all the procedures of how things work in Wikipedia. I read carefully now adn I will read carefully from now on all guidelines. According to your last message , I have a question (just to make sure that I understood): First, the Draft:Stavros Triantafyllidis is under review, does this mean that I can improve it? For example, Can I provide more detailed biography for Stavros Triantafyllidis life? As is still under review? Second,as far as the published articles are concerned (not articles that I have contributed to publish), such as "Olympic Truce" (link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Olympic_truce) which is already published, or "Samoans" (link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samoans), Could I contribute and edit them? If I have the knowledge, and I can contribute, add more information, imprive writing etc., based on all guidelines of Wikipedia. In that case, can I edit published articles? Third, Does the topic ban cover only articles related to my category? or all the othe topics and categories? For example if I would like to edit a published articles related tou "Plants and Science" can I edit? or like I mentioned the "Samans" can I edit? Thank you, and really appreciate your time and help in advance!

Draft:Stavros Triantafyllidis: Yes, you can edit it, since it's still under review - that's what the "Draft:" at its start means.
Olympic truce, Samoans, miscellaneous plant and animal articles: Yes; they're not about you. (And wouldn't be even if you were Samoan, not Greek.)
Michalis Triantafyllidis: No, because it's 1) a published article that is 2) about your relative. —Cryptic 03:22, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good. I will act according to your feedback. Thank you. If I misunderstand anything in the future, I will ask you a question to make sure that I am not violate the Wikipedia policies. Really appreciate for everything!

Nomination of Green mind theory for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Green mind theory is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Green mind theory until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Largoplazo (talk) 21:10, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Stavros Triantafyllidis (February 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nihlus was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Stavros Triantafyllidis and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Stavros Triantafyllidis, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Nihlus 21:57, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Stavros Triandafylides! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Nihlus 21:57, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reference spamming

Above you committed "cease editing articles about myself, my relatives, and my companies" yet today you have added references to your own work to several articles. This is considered reference spamming as the primary reason appears to draw readers towards your publications. Please do not do it again. SmartSE (talk) 08:49, 2 May 2018 (UTC) Thank you for your understanding. I will utilize references as reccomended.[reply]

Deceptive edit summaries

Please use edit summaries that accurately reflect the edits you have made. Adding a reference to yourself is not a "verbal improvement" as it would usually be understood, i.e., an improvement to the construction or wording of a passage of text. Shock Brigade Harvester Boris (talk) 23:02, 2 May 2018 (UTC) Thank you for your reccomendation and support. I really appreciate it.[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Stavros Triantafyllidis

Hello, Stavros Triandafylides. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Stavros Triantafyllidis".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Sam Sailor 21:29, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of DeRosan

The article DeRosan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I don't see anything indicating that DeRosan is notable; and the website no longer exists. This page should be deleted.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rockstone^{[Send me a message!]} 23:30, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for sockpuppetry and self promotion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. SmartSE (talk) 13:48, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]