User talk:Tearstosweat

December 2017

Hello, I'm Oshwah. An edit you recently made to Uppum Mulakum seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 10:34, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to S. P. Sreekumar, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Bennv3771 (talk) 11:35, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia!

Hello, Tearstosweat, and welcome to Wikipedia!

An edit that you recently made to S. P. Sreekumar seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox.

Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Bennv3771 (talk) 11:37, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Stop adding circular links

Please stop trying to link to pages that don't exist, especially since you are just linking alternative names which would just link right back to the original article. Please read MOS:LINK. Bennv3771 (talk) 11:41, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Font colours

Hi there, please refrain from adding font colours as you've done here and here. In addition to looking unprofessional, as encyclopedias typically don't mess with font colours, we care about content accessibility. Readers who are colour blind or readers with other visual impairments may have trouble seeing the content, which is problematic.

Also, re: this edit, we don't typically use Malayalam script in articles at the English Wikipedia. Members of the Noticeboard for India-related Topics prefers that we not use Indic scripts in the infobox or lead section. There might be an argument for using it in the body of the article, but we always translate non-English words, so that our readers across the globe can understand it. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:14, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Biju Sopanam (December 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ernestchuajiasheng was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The personal life and career sections lack of inclined citation and would be prone to being challenged. Some of the sources didn't even mention the actor while others were just mere mentions.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Biju Sopanam and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Biju Sopanam, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ernestchuajiasheng (talk) 16:38, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Tearstosweat, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Ernestchuajiasheng (talk) 16:38, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May I know the reason for declining my article? Tearstosweat (talk) 17:01, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Biju Sopanam (December 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Biju Sopanam and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Biju Sopanam, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 17:25, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Biju Sopanam

Greetings, Tearstosweat. Your draft was declined because sources you used as references were unreliable. Sources should be secondary sources so that they are verifiable. For example, a major newspaper, a factual and widely-published book, high-quality generally trusted mainstream publications and not blogs, MySpace, Facebook, LinkedIn, YouTube, fansites, Twitter, wikis, or other sites with user-generated content. You can visit Help:Referencing for beginners, Help:Introduction to referencing with Wiki Markup/1, WP:BLP and also WP:ENTERTAINER for more information to improve your draft. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time. Thank you and good luck. Ernestchuajiasheng (talk) 10:28, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Times of India & Decaan Chronicle are renowned major newspapers in India. Then why they can't be approved as reference..? Tearstosweat (talk) 22:32, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decaan Chronicle was added in after my visit to your draft. It would be best to add your sources using an inclined citation and to include more quality sources like Times of India. Nevertheless, you could consult help from Theroadislong pertaining your draft should you have more enquiries. Ernestchuajiasheng (talk) 04:21, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Unni Mukundan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Oru Murai Vanthu Parthaya (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:53, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NOINDICSCRIPT

Hi there, thank you for your recent edits[1][2] at Uppum Mulakum, but per community consensus detailed at WP:NOINDICSCRIPT, we do not add Indic scripts to article leads or to the infobox. Thanks for understanding, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 05:37, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Awards not merited

You seem to have insufficient time and edit count to give yourself th awards . Please explain. -- Alexf^(talk) 12:45, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of Malayalam-language television channels. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Alexf^(talk) 12:47, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Biju Sopanam (February 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dial911 was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Biju Sopanam instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Biju Sopanam and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Biju Sopanam, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dial911 (talk) 15:23, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Biju Sopanam

A tag has been placed on Draft:Biju Sopanam requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Page already exists in mainspace.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Dial911 (talk) 15:24, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Muhammed Zafwan (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. —SpacemanSpiff 03:48, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]