User talk:TheCyberDragon

Welcome!

Welcome...

Hello, TheCyberDragon, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Tweedle (talk) 16:24, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May 2023

Hello, I'm Dr Greg. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Yorkshire and the Humber have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. The "Yorkshire and the Humber" region is not the same thing as the historic county of Yorkshire. Dr Greg talk 20:59, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: I'm Lum-chan the Notorious! (September 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:I'm Lum-chan the Notorious! and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 18:04, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TheCyberDragon! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 18:04, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: I'm Lum-chan the Notorious! (September 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:

The proposed article is not suitable for Wikipedia. Because Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, articles on fictional subjects should cover their real-world context and contain sourced analysis, offering detail on a work's development, impact or historical significance—not just a summary of the plot. You may wish to add this content to an existing article, such as I'm Lum-chan the Notorious!. As anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are free to do so yourself.

The comment the reviewer left was:

As much as I like Urusei Yatsura, Wikipedia articles are not to consist solely of plot summaries with nothing else.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:I'm Lum-chan the Notorious! and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Qcne (talk) 18:09, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: I'm Lum-chan the Notorious! (September 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:

The proposed article is not suitable for Wikipedia. Because Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, articles on fictional subjects should cover their real-world context and contain sourced analysis, offering detail on a work's development, impact or historical significance—not just a summary of the plot. You may wish to add this content to an existing article, such as Urusei Yatsura. As anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are free to do so yourself.

The comment the reviewer left was:

No, sorry, adding an infobox does nothing for this article. Please do not remove previous decline notices.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:I'm Lum-chan the Notorious! and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Qcne (talk) 18:23, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

County flags

Hi TheCyberDragon, can I ask you to pause adding flags to English county infoboxes for a sec? I'll explain more fully below, I just wanted to notify you quickly. A.D.Hope (talk) 13:55, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

So, the main reason the English counties don't have flags in their infobox is that most flags represent the historic counties; they've been registered with the Flag Institute, which only registers flags for the historic counties. The county infoboxes, on the other hand, are about the ceremonial counties. The borders of the two types of county are often different, so the historic flags shouldn't be used to represent the ceremonial counties. Instead, the historic flags are often included somewhere in the body of the article (e.g. Herefordshire#Emblems).

I hope that makes sense, but feel free to ask if you have any questions. A.D.Hope (talk) 14:05, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why does the "Flag Institute" only register flags for Historic counties?

Why do they not register flags for Ceremonial Counties? TheCyberDragon (talk) 17:13, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure, it's probably just a decision they've made. They're our main source for many of the county flags, however, so using them for the ceremonial counties is tricky. A.D.Hope (talk) 17:17, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

And it's also completely wrong. We don't recognise the difference between 'historic' and other types of county on wikipedia as our longstanding policy makes clear. Also why are you giving credence to the flag institute? They aren't an official body. G-13114 (talk) 18:34, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again! It's now part of the WP:UKCOUNTIES guidelines that the ceremonial county infoboxes shouldn't contain flags, so it would be helpful if you didn't re-add them. Thanks, A.D.Hope (talk) 13:37, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

but the articles are not only about the Ceremonial counties, they are also about the Historic counties.

The Ceremonial County and Historic County are the same article, so why can't I add the flag of a Historic county on an article about the Historic county? TheCyberDragon (talk) 16:49, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You shouldn't need to – the historic county flags registered with the Flag Institute should all be somewhere in the body of the relevant ceremonial county article. A.D.Hope (talk) 16:50, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Flag of Appleby-in-Westmoreland (February 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CoconutOctopus was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Flag of Appleby-in-Westmoreland and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CoconutOctopus talk 19:19, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:I'm Lum-chan the Notorious!

Hello, TheCyberDragon. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:I'm Lum-chan the Notorious!, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:04, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Portraits of historical figures

Hi TheCyberDragon, I've just reverted several of your edits at Alfred the Great, Henry V of England, and Henry IV of England. In most cases, a contemporary image of a biographical subject is more encyclopedic and natural than one made hundreds of years later by someone who never saw the subject. There may be exceptions, such as later portraits that are widely recognized as the best image of the subject, but this didn't appear to be the case. I hope this helps. Please let me know if you have any questions. Cheers! Woodroar (talk) 16:24, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Flag of Appleby-in-Westmoreland

Hello, TheCyberDragon. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Flag of Appleby-in-Westmoreland, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:05, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: I'm Lum-chan the Notorious! (July 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Significa liberdade was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Article needs sources to establish notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:I'm Lum-chan the Notorious! and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 23:50, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]