User talk:TheEmeraldMiner1

August 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Jacob Sartorius has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Jacob Sartorius was changed by TheEmeraldMiner1 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.955763 on 2016-08-17T19:59:41+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:59, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Killing of Harambe. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 02:05, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Cory in the House. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Geraldo Perez (talk) 22:57, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:TheEmeraldMiner1

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:TheEmeraldMiner1, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 23:59, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion

This page is not unambiguously promotional, because... (It’s a joke; I don’t really care if anybody subscribes to my YouTube page.) --TheEmeraldMiner1 (talk) 00:06, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Tiangong-1. Izno (talk) 21:29, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. --Dlohcierekim (talk) 22:30, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

October 2018

Hello, I'm Dan Koehl. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Alabama— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Dan Koehl (talk) 19:30, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. IdreamofJeanie (talk) 19:27, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. IdreamofJeanie (talk) 19:31, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:34, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]