User talk:The Gold VR

The Gold VR, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!

The

Adventure

Hi The Gold VR!! You're invited: learn how to edit Wikipedia in under an hour. I hope to see you there! Ocaasi

Play The Wikipedia Adventure

This message was delivered by HostBot (talk) 18:21, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Fewer Friends

The article Fewer Friends has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No references, no claim of notability, fails WP:NSONG and WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richhoncho (talk) 23:40, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Jetix, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Diffs: [1] and [2] The content you are submitting is unsourced, firstly, and although it is bold, it has been contested. Per WP:BRD, if your edit is contested, you need to open a discussion on the article's talk page to achieve consensus, not resubmit it. Resubmission of contested content is considered edit-warring, which can result in your account being blocked. Consensus is achieved through discussion. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 21:55, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

God, well sorry. Who are you anyway? The Gold VR (talk) 21:56, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Cyphoidbomb. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Jetix, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Diffs: [3] The content you have submitted is still unsourced, and you need to use the talk page to establish consensus for the formatting changes you are making. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 14:23, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. NeilN ^{talk to me} 15:02, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bbb23 (talk) 17:16, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

The Gold VR (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

What the f**k is this nonsense? I ain't no sock. That f**ks are probabbly just messing about. They should be blocked and I should be unblocked. I make good edits. The Gold VR (talk) 10:27, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You may want to address the conclusions and material presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/HoshiNoKaabii2000 instead of ranting. Kuru (talk) 12:09, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

So what? I kind of edit the same pages he does. That Jetania thing I said in an edit summary, I dunno. I may have heard of the guy before. I was probabbly joking about. The Gold VR (talk) 14:16, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]