User talk:Thu
Welcome!
Hello, Thu, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Merovingian (t) (c) 15:37, August 30, 2005 (UTC)
Help
[edit]I created this site based on Lord of the Rings. I could use some help developing it. Would you like to? Here is the link:
http://lordoftheringsmelkorfaction.wetpaint.com/
Please give me some help, I could use it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rembrant13 (talk • contribs) 00:18, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
WikiProject Middle-earth
[edit]Hello, Thu! Thank you for your contributions to a Tolkien-related article. If you are interested, feel free to join WikiProject Middle-earth, a WikiProject focused on improving Tolkien-related articles in Wikipedia. We would be glad to have you join in the effort! Here're some good links and subpages related to the WikiProject.
If you have any questions or concerns, don't hesitate to ask on our talk page. Thank you for your contributions and have fun editing! --Mirlen 17:28, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
Update
[edit]There is a poll/proposal concerning the renaming of our WikiProject. Please vote here to share your opinion! —Mirlen
The Lord of the Rings Peer Review
[edit]I have make extensive changes to our Lord of the Rings article in an attempt to work it up to Featured Article status. In order to find more suggestions I have listed it under Wikipedia:Peer Review. Under the guidelines to nominations I am required to notify others of knowledge in the area to review it. I have decided that the best group for this would be our WikiProject. So I ask you all to look at the article and make any suggestions you can. Hopefully we will be voting this FA soon enough. SorryGuy 00:58, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
Maia/Vala/Ainu
[edit]I am doing a typo run on Middle-earth articles now, and I'm also correcting any instances of links to Maia/Vala/Ainu (and other races). Just so you know ;) -- Jordi·✆ 13:23, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
ME-ref
[edit]I added entries for the Chronology and Reader's Guide as you requested, but can't find author, publiser, ISBN etc.. Can you add these to the pages? Chronology is Template:ME-ref/CHR and Reader's Guide is Template:ME-ref/RG. -- Jordi·✆ 09:18, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
Wikilinking plurals
[edit]A neater way of linking plurals is seen here. Hope that helps. Carcharoth 13:15, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
Lotr IS a trilogy. 3 Books. Therefore Trilogy! --Jestix 17:24, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
I'd like to volunteer an exerpt from the Foreword of the Lord Of The Rings. This is how the Foreword begins. As in the first page.
"Note on the Text: J. R. R. Tolkien's The Lord of the Rings is often erroneously called a trilogy, when it is in fact a single novel, consisting of six books plus appendices, sometimes published in three volumes."
--Will.r.french 15:49, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
Merging Shire articles
[edit]I replied to your comment at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Middle-earth/things_to_do. Thanks. Carcharoth 11:09, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
Redirects
[edit]Hi Thu. I noticed you moved Almaren, which is good, but when moving sections, there will often be a link pointing to the section, and that will need updating. See my edit here. To find the things pointing at a section, use "what links here" if the name isn't obvious. In this case, it is obvious: Almaren. Thanks. Carcharoth 15:14, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
English/American spelling
[edit]You wrote:
- Please don't 'correct' edits without checking your facts. -ize is a perfectly acceptable British English spelling variant (see American and British English spelling differences#-ise, -ize) and was JRRT's preferred form. Thu (talk) 09:54, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
The Hobbit article has seen endless edits back and forth on this. It's inane. The British and Australian readership will continue to revert it to "ise" regardless of your position on the topic; the article had largely gelled on "ise" until you came along and decided that your "correct" was more "correct" than what was already there. It's hard to care anymore. If you can find some authority on Tolkien's preference in that regard, or can come up with several pages from his writing that demonstrate it, I'll be happy to leave your edits alone. I just read an entire chapter out of The Hobbit without finding a single word ending in ise/ize, so I'm done looking.
Featured article review
[edit]Thought you might be interested in helping out with improving The Lord of the Rings, so I'm letting you know about Wikipedia:Featured article review/The Lord of the Rings. Thanks. Carcharoth (talk) 02:24, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
/Forward_error_correction
Pier Gerlofs Donia]]
[edit]Please review and pass the following article for GA class. Last king of Frisia (talk) 09:55, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
Science Future Vision
[edit]If its pure invention, use afd. I'm not qualified to judge whether or not it is, but i do know that it cannot at this point be called unquestionable vandalism. But if the bands mentioned do not exist either, use a prod tag and say so. that would be enough to make it a hoax, and prod is the place for hoaxes. If they do exist, you'll have to argue the existence of the genre at afd. DGG (talk) 17:26, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Josh Sanders
[edit]An article that you have been involved in editing, Josh Sanders, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Josh Sanders. Thank you. ttonyb1 (talk) 23:38, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
File copyright problem with File:AccessRunner.jpg
[edit]Thank you for uploading File:AccessRunner.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. — neuro(talk) 21:52, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
You are now a Reviewer
[edit]Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.
Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.
When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.
If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 17:56, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
The Hobbit FA push
[edit]Hello. As you've been one of the more regular contributors to The Hobbit I thought I'd let you know that I'd like to nominate it as a Featured Article candidate. The article has recently received a peer review and I've addressed the issues that were mentioned by the reviewer. But if you think there's some more work to do, please let me know. The only thing I'm a bit worried about is the mentioning of the very first film adaptation, an animated short film by Gene Deitch of Tom & Jerry fame, that has only recently been recalled by its creator. The sourcing for this entry is a bit poor but from my point of view the rest of the article is ready to go. Regards, De728631 (talk) 15:43, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:50, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Invitation to a research survey
[edit]Hello Thu, I am Qi Wu, a computer science MS student at the University of Minnesota - Twin Cities. Currently, we are working on a project studying the main article and sub article relationship in a purpose of better serving the Wikipedia article structure. It would be appreciated if you could take 4-5 minutes to finish the survey questions. Thanks in advance! We will not collect any of your personally information.
Thank you for your time to participate this survey. Your response is important for us!
https://umn.qualtrics.com/SE/?SID=SV_bvm2A1lvzYfJN9H
License tagging for File:WGA3 Flames of the Falcon.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:WGA3 Flames of the Falcon.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.
To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 00:05, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]Hello, Thu. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page.
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]Hello, Thu. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Thu. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Thu. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
The article Ornendil has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Very minor character from Tolkien works. No in-depth coverage. WP:PLOT. Fails WP:NFICTION/WP:GNG.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 05:33, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit]Nomination of Malbeth the Seer for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Malbeth the Seer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Malbeth the Seer until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:32, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
"Nár" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Nár. Since you had some involvement with the Nár redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. BenKuykendall (talk) 19:24, 31 January 2020 (UTC)