User talk:TitanSymphony

New messages will appear at the bottom of this page.

Welcome!

Hello, TitanSymphony, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Eyer ^contact 21:39, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Why Illggd (talk) 21:45, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Because TitanSymphony (talk) 21:46, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Define because Illggd (talk) 21:48, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop wasting my time. It's not funny. TitanSymphony (talk) 21:49, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry Illggd (talk) 21:50, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Help me!

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

What's the board on Wikipedia for reporting vandalism to admins? In my 10 or so years of absence, I have forgotten its name.

TitanSymphony (talk) 09:40, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

That would be WP:AIV. 331dot (talk) 09:40, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! TitanSymphony (talk) 09:42, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi User:TitanSymphony, thanks for reporting users to WP:AIV. I would encourage you to refresh yourself with Wikipedia:Vandalism#How_to_respond_to_vandalism when you have a chance. Some of the users you reported recently haven't vandalized since receiving a warning, and that falls under Step 5 of the above: "While not strictly required, administrators there are most likely to respond rapidly to requests which include at least two warnings, culminating in the level-four "last chance" template." Consider waiting to see if a user continues vandalism after a warning before reporting, rather than reporting if they stop their disruption after receiving a warning. Best, Spencer^T•C 09:54, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Ang Probinsyano

Good day!

I dropped by to seek your help in preventing vandalisms on the page Ang Probinsyano perpetrated by User:Kazu parungao. I'd like to point out that the edits he makes is moot and academic considering that those points he is raising is adequately addressed in the notes attached to the characters which the user is editing. The fact that the information is obvious if the user only took the time to read the attached note makes the mootness of his edits all the more glaring. The fact that the user persists in doing so, in my view, warrants him or her to be sanctioned.

Warmest regards. Gardo Versace (talk) 12:02, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Steve Kazor

My brother is Steve Kazor. He has asked me to remove certain info from his page that is either too personal, too specific, or erroneous. I made 10 edits today... Slowly and methodically to ensure the correct GENERAL information is appearing. With one swipe somehow you undid everything i worked on!! Please stop reverting the back back! Kaliena22 (talk) 21:04, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Kaliena22: Unfortunately we can't believe what you're stating, since you haven't proven it yet. I have reverted your newest edits. TitanSymphony (talk) 21:17, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Edit Filter

Just a FYI, once your account becomes "confirmed" (required 4 days and some minimal amount of edits that you have already surpassed), you will trip a lot fewer edit filters. Sasquatch t|c 22:28, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Cool. TitanSymphony (talk) 00:09, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah. Unfortunately, until then, you will probably continue to trip the "rapid revert" edit filter. You can request Confirmed Rights early at WP:RFR if you want, but admins usually don't grant this right to newcomers. LightandDark2000 🌀 (talk) 02:41, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I can live with that. I've only got one more day though. TitanSymphony (talk) 02:42, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop posting about this to WP:AIV That is not the proper place to make your complaints. Sasquatch t|c 02:47, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

About the "Bot-reported" false positives? OK, I shall stop. TitanSymphony (talk) 12:26, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Can you prove that Cafzal is your account (I don't see any account named BoredHistoryGeek)? The way I see it, that account would have Extended confirmed rights if it made one more edit, anyway, and this account is a WP:LEGITSOCK. So I see no reason why this account shouldn't have xcon rights, also, though an admin might see it differently. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 03:02, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, I don't think so. I have long forgotten the password to my first account. I have no quibs about "making a fresh start under a new name", though. That way, I can avoid some of the mistakes I made previously (e. g. cluttering my user page with userboxes!) TitanSymphony (talk) 12:26, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hey...

Why is MY edit, to Alistair Brownlee, listed as a possible BLP violation? TitanSymphony (talk) 12:42, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Special:AbuseFilter/364 tags all not-yet confirmed user's changes to information in infoboxes as a possible BLP violation. It's an automated thing because most people who just join Wikipedia aren't as helpful on the anti-vandalism front as you have been. Please don't take it personally. If you have any more questions about the WP:Edit filter, you can ask me on my talk page. Cheers. Sasquatch t|c 15:33, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Whew! Hopefully this problem fades by tomorrow morning! TitanSymphony (talk) 15:34, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Warn after Reverts

Hi TitanSymphony, It would be best if you warned the vandals after each revert. You can use Twinkle to make it easier and faster.

Cheers, --BoothSiftTalks 01:26, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@BoothSift: How do I enable Twinkle? I took a quick scroll down Preferences, but I can't find it! TitanSymphony (talk) 01:27, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi TitanSymphony! You created a thread called Kurdistan at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Gregg Popovich page

What do you mean my accidental mistake was a common problem Illggd (talk) 00:27, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

TonyBallioni (talk) 00:35, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Hungarian folk songs

A tag has been placed on Category:Hungarian folk songs requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 03:16, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]