User talk:TogetherinParis

Could you join in the discussion regarding your work in pheromones in Talk:Pheromone? I'd like to have a public conversation regarding your contributions. --Piquan 11:57, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

HOPE Scholarship[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to this article; however, without citations, I felt like I had to revert your changes, as I've never heard of most of what you said. Bubba Nicholson did not come up on Google, and I can't find anything regarding HOPE from 1975. I'd love to see your sources, but until you put them in the article, I'm afraid your edits don't belong in Wikipedia. Thanks for contributing, though, and I look forward to more from you in the future. --SuperNova |T|C| 21:52, 9 June 2006 (UTC) Ask Tom Houk, Zell Miller's first chief of staff. He currently lives in Atlanta, Georgia. Mary Beasley was Zell Miller's secretary later on (she was also Jimmy Carter's secretary) and she knew me well. Also Mr. Lipshitz who worked for Carter knew me, as did his daughter with the contractured knuckle on her right hand, brilliant girl. Miller's head door keeper was a former Atlanta Brave and I worked for him briefly before my promotion to Postmaster of the Georgia Senate and aide for student and university affairs. A letter I wrote to Miller is in the state archives, although my original proposal for the HOPE Scholarship went missing. Another copy was sent to the US National Archives in Washington, D.C., but it was returned. The Atlanta Journal newspaper carried an article on the beginnings of HOPE from my proposal which every person in Miller's office signed. It was the only document signed by every member of his staff, including the secretaries.[reply]

Your edits to The Island (2005 film)[edit]

Thank you for experimenting with the page The Island (2005 film) on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. MarkBrooks 12:22, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to John F. Kennedy, you will be blocked from editing. --Nlu (talk) 14:02, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, and your repeated vandalism in the Braveheart article is not much better. Either grow up or get out. the very next time you vandalize the Braveheart page, you won't like the results. - Arcayne (^{cast a spell}) 20:07, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What the hell was your point of your post in my page? It came across like some wildly self-important and disturbed rant. You are going to find that if you are even a quarter as famous and well-known as you claim (or think) you are, you are going to be exceptionally disappointed by Wikipedia. I don't care who you are. If you follow the rules that the rest of us consensually agree to, we are going to be just dandy. If you don't, you and I have a problem. Now, it isn't the sort of problem that cannot be resolved (and no, not resolved at 20 paces on a dusty street at high noon), but you are going to find that treating me with less respect than you yourself would desire is going to garner the absolute worst result from me. Now, you may not care about that now, but I am planning on being here for the long haul. At some point, we are going to encounter each other again (that is, if you aren't blocked or banned at some point); its in everyone's best interest to stay civil. - Arcayne (^{cast a spell}) 10:44, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: From your userpage[edit]

Wow. You should accept the word of any person who claims to be a principal with personal knowledge of historical events. I certainly wouldn't mind if my contribution waits for authentication, but to be labeled and attacked injudiciously by someone without knowledge of the facts is unfair and even unwise on your part. Not only is history lost (at least for the present--you haven't totally erased anything), but you will inevitably subject yourself to criticism, perhaps for generations on end.
You seem to feel some problem with my attempting to write you. You were first and I respond similarly. You hurt my feelings with your untruths.
Gee. I hope you start feeling better. Exercise is always good!
Yours in service,
Ross C. "Bubba" Nicholson
Postmaster of the Georgia Senate, 1975.
Tom Houck was Zell's Chief of staff
Pat Jarvis, a former baseball player, was head doorkeeper.
McQuerter? was Secretary of the Senate. Julian Bond and Senator Tate were present, too. Senator Bond would remember that I advised him to seek his current position, after a stint as an announcer. I have the handbook around somewhere, but what's the point? You wouldn't believe that, either. TogetherinParis (talk) 12:42, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

I would really appreciate if you could refrain from posting messages to me from here on. I am not really quite sure what sort of approbation you are seeking to receive from me, but allow me to succinctly state that I am not prepared to render it. I will delete your post from my user/talk page, since revealing your real name on Wikipedia isn't all that wise. And if it isn't you, I don't really want to play your reindeer games. Thanks for the post, but please, pedal crazy somewhere else. I'm all stocked up here. - Arcayne (^{cast a spell}) 22:33, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Pheromone. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- Ed (Edgar181) 01:12, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Strobe Talbot edit.[edit]

Strobe Talbot modeled for several memorable characters in Indiana Jones and Star Wars movies.TogetherinParis (talk) 15:10, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to Romano-Ward syndrome. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. -- Ed (Edgar181) 20:31, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

January 2009, vandalism[edit]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did to Bill Clinton, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This warning covers your vandalism at Hillary Rodham Clinton, Steven Spielberg and the Robert F. Kennedy assassination as well. Tarc (talk) 15:39, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

May 2012[edit]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Farry (talk) 08:41, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Materialscientist (talk) 23:26, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014, vandalism[edit]

I have reverted your homophobic and otherwise disruptive vandalism to the Oxycodone page. Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Oxycodone, you may be blocked from editing. InfestedTemplar (talk) 23:31, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: slight overlap - I was adding this warning before the blocked message above was added. InfestedTemplar (talk) 23:36, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TogetherinParis (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not afraid of homosexual people. I have been accused of a crime, "vandalism", that I did not commit, nor do I have any idea what the problem is. I wrote about homosexuality because I am a recognized expert in the field of chemical ecology. I've appeared on BBC-TV Channel 4, and Tomorrow's World, on CBC-TV, and Australian national broadcasting. I attended four years of medical school. the word "perversion" is or was? generally accepted medical terminology. Indeed, when sexually perverted people were openly and physically attacked in America I proposed the Don't Ask--Don't Tell policy for accepting homosexual people and other perverted people into the US military. Furthermore, I have never, even once, vandalized any article on Wikipedia. I have offered corrections when I was physically present at the historical event. Your policy of accusing innocent people, in my case, is troubling and wrong. I feel that religious bias is frequently in play. I am a scientist. I believe in a physical world. I believe in Occam's razor, that simple explanations should prevail. I have no personality, no psychological states, no self concepts, no ghost. Instead of false accusations of criminal behavior, perhaps alternative viewpoints should be respected. I demand an apology and restoration of my completely honest and truthful edits.

Decline reason:

On Wikipedia, anyone can claim to be whoever they want, but it carries no weight - the content of your contribution is what is judged here. And what I see is disruptive and unsourced or improperly sourced nonsense being added to articles, together with unacceptable homophobic terminology. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:06, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.