User talk:Trimatis

This is Trimatis's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (August 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This submission seems to be a test edit and not an article worthy of an encyclopedia. Please use the sandbox for any editing tests, but do not submit for review until you have an article that you want reviewed for inclusion in Wikipedia. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Trimatis/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:20, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Trimatis! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:20, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (August 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission seems to be a test edit and not an article worthy of an encyclopedia. Please use the sandbox for any editing tests, but do not submit for review until you have an article that you want reviewed for inclusion in Wikipedia. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Trimatis/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 11:06, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (August 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Trimatis/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:30, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Trimatis/sandbox

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Trimatis/sandbox, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
It appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free Web hosting service. (See section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:30, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Thanuja Theethira (August 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by InterstellarGamer12321 were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This is a WP:BLP article, so all statements and claims should be backed up with inline citations to reliable sources. Almost all information in the article is unsourced. See WP:REFB and MOS:CITE for information on how to cite sources properly.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Thanuja Theethira and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 15:03, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

About Draft:Thanuja Theethira

Hello Trimatis and welcome to Wikipedia! I'm here concerning Draft:Thanuja Theethira. A word of advice, please heed User:InterstellarGamer12321's comment after your last proposal before trying to submit it again, as it will almost certainly be declined. As the article is about a living person, there is a higher standard of verifiability than standard. I'd recommend that you try some beginner tasks at the task center to learn the ropes before you jump straight into creating an article. Please also read and follow Wikipedia's manual of style. If you have any questions, please drop by the Teahouse or leave a note on my talk page. Thank you. Grumpylawnchair (talk) 04:22, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What is the error?

I have created About Draft:Thanuja Theethira . What is the error or mistake in this?? What is reliable sources? What need to do to publish this page officially? Trimatis (talk) 05:54, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

All facts must be confirmed by references. David notMD (talk) 10:13, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The photograph is scheduled to be deleted from Commons and the draft as there is no evidence confirming that you personally took the photo despite claiming it as your own work. David notMD (talk) 12:10, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Thanuja Theethira (August 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

issues not addressed it is disruptive and pointless to re-submit with zero improvement.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Thanuja Theethira and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 06:07, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Paid editing

As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Trimatis, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Trimatis|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. Theroadislong (talk) 06:09, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (August 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

We're sorry, but we cannot accept blank submissions. If in fact you did include text within the article, but it isn't showing, please make sure that any extra text above your entry is removed, as it may be causing it to hide and not be shown to the reviewer.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Trimatis/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:17, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Trimatis

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Trimatis, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. VViking_TalkEdits 14:03, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you create an inappropriate page. --VViking_TalkEdits 14:03, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

But what is the error in that ?? Trimatis (talk) 14:09, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong place. Your User page is only to contain information about you as a Wikipedia editor. It is not a place to create a draft or website-like content. See WP:UP. As not being an Administrator, I cannot see what was deleted at User:Trimatis, I can guess it was about your company. David notMD (talk) 16:19, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Also, your draft about Prem Jayan had so much wonderful content about him, his skill, his talent, his expertise, etc. I deleted all of that as not being neutral point of view. If you have a reference of someone saying nice things about him, OK; if it's you, not. David notMD (talk) 16:34, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okay now where to create a article for a actor ? What are the requirements for that? What are the procedure for create an article for a movie ? Trimatis (talk) 03:41, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

And Prem Jayan is a notable cinematographer ..We need his wikipedia page, so what is there reason to delete the page or declining ? Where to create a article for him ? and what are the requirements, rules and regulations for creating an article for actor / cinematograhper ? Trimatis (talk) 04:26, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You still have not adequately responded or taken action to the inquiry regarding your appearance as an undisclosed paid editor. If you make any additional edits without complying, you may be blocked from editing. DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:51, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: User:Trimatis/sandbox has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at User:Trimatis/sandbox. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 16:35, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okay now where to create a article for a actor ? What are the requirements for that? What are the procedure for create an article for a movie ? And Prem Jayan is a notable cinematographer ..We need his wikipedia page, so what is there reason to delete the page or declining ? Where to create a article for him ? and what are the requirements, rules and regulations for creating an article for actor / cinematograhper ?

Trimatis (talk) 06:13, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:NACTOR for the criteria, you can create an article at WP:AFC. Theroadislong (talk) 07:09, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

More specifically, you can submit a draft via AfC, which will then be reviewed by an experienced reviewer. All the cuts I made to the Sandbox draft were to improve the draft, but in no was guarantees it will be accepted. I am not a Reviewer. P.S. 'Birthdate' calls for a year (confirmed by a ref), not the date of a month. David notMD (talk) 12:22, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing establishes notability. The references for the movies list his name for cinematography but are not ABOUT him. What is essential are references that are to published articles about him as a cinematographer. Without at least three references like that, there is no potential for the draft to be approved. David notMD (talk) 12:28, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Thanuja Theethira

Hello, Trimatis. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Thanuja Theethira, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:06, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]