User talk:Tuttermouse

September 2016

Hello, I'm Cahk. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Template:The Original Barnstar have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Cahk (talk) 08:28, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Cahk (talk) 08:30, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Your username impersonates User:TutterMouse and you have made only unconstructive edits. I have therefore blocked you per WP:NOTHERE. If you would care to explain, I am listening. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 08:39, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Anna Frodesiak: Sorry I did not know that there was another user named Tuttermouse. My edits are not unconstructive. Users @EvergreenFir, SephyTheThird, TheFarix, Koavf, Materialscientist, Satellizer, and Koala Tea Of Mercy: can all verify that my edits are very constructive. Tuttermouse (talk) 08:42, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Futanari (criminal organization)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that Futanari (criminal organization), a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It is unambiguous vandalism or an obvious hoax. (See section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please do not introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia; doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.
It covers a topic on which we already have an article - Five Points Gang. (See section A10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Five Points Gang, or to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Cahk (talk) 08:40, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]