User talk:Uncle Scrooge
|
Welcome to my Talk Page! |
Claymore (manga)
[edit]The Claymore (manga) page has too much in-universe information in it since you merged the content from the other page. I was the one who initially created the other page in order to simplify the main one. Can you tell me the reason for re-merging them? 23:55, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
- Look at Claymore talk page ;)
Mrpouetpouet (talk) 23:57, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
Request for Username change
[edit]A note has been posted about your request. It can be found here. Icestorm815 • Talk 00:15, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of User infobox:Uncle Scrooge
[edit]
A tag has been placed on User infobox:Uncle Scrooge, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 18:32, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
- Wrong title O_O Uncle Scrooge (talk) 18:36, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
ZOMG giant squirrel i can has laste?
[edit]That is a BIG squirrel image! - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 18:49, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
Map
[edit]as ypu can see it is marked "West Germany / Germany, USSR / Russia, Czechoslovakia / Czech Republic, SFR Yugoslavia / FR Yugoslavia / Serbia and Montenegro / Serbia are all shown separatly" There would be no reason not to have consistency — chandler — 18:18, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
- Yes but if you look at all the other pictures (World Cup pictures) they have the USSR Czechoslovakia Yugoslavia etc separated, and I would be for skipping the old countries and just have a current map etc, but I think it's only consistent to have either all or none former states "split" on the map — chandler — 10:11, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
Ancient revert at Russia and the United Nations
[edit]Just got my eyes on an edit of yours from February 19, which among other things restored the "Counter-Arguments" section that had been added by Supersexyspacemonkey on July 19, 2006 and removed by Miyokan on January 6 as "one big original research violation", which sounds about right. I was just about to remove the section again, but checked the history first and wanted to know if there is some sort of dispute behind this or if the section just happened to slip back in during your reverting other stuff. -- Jao (talk) 21:20, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
Copyright concerns, UEFA Cup Winners' Cup records and statistics
[edit]Hello. The article UEFA Cup Winners' Cup records and statistics was listed on the copyright problems board on September 2nd, here. Under question was the section entitled "Trivia and records", which was added to the article by you in June of 2007, here. This material seems to have been duplicated, not from the source that the tagger identified, but from this source. Archived version shows that it was practically identical to the version you added as of May 2007. The material has had to be modified or removed. While that source does permit reuse if authorship is credited, it would have been insufficient simply to add that attribution because it explicitly reserves all other rights, which is incompatible with GFDL. Material released to Wikipedia must authorize modifications as well.
If you are the author of the original website and wish to verify Wikipedia's rights to use the material according to GFDL, please review "donating copyrighted materials" for further steps. If you are not but believe that the author will permit its use, please see "using copyrighted works from others". Alternatively, you are welcome to revise the text in your own words.
Please let me if you would like to discuss the situation. I will be watching your talk page for a time, as I find it easier to keep conversations together, but you can of course reply at my talk page if you'd prefer. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 11:44, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
- Ah, thank you for clearing that up for me. I need to look at the main article, then, to see when it first arrived. Just as a general note, when you split material from one article to another, please mention the split in the edit summaries for the source and destination articles. This is necessary for GFDL compliance, so that readers of the article can see in the article history who authored what. :) --Moonriddengirl (talk) 16:34, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
- Found it. An IP editor introduced it in 2005, and an earlier archive of the source confirms it was there first. Again, thanks for clearing that up. :) --Moonriddengirl (talk) 16:40, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:LausanneHClogo.png
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:LausanneHClogo.png. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check
- That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
- That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 09:25, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
House WikiProject
[edit]
Cheers. --Music26/11 17:04, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
Request for involvement
[edit]According to the history of the Iran-Iraq War article, you are a significant contributor to it. Therefore, I was wondering if you would like to get involved in a discussion I have started concerning a proposal to trim some sections, and move some text back into the article. The discussion can be found here: [1]. Thank you very much if you do get involved. Cheers for reading. Terrakyte (talk) 22:34, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
List of European Cup and UEFA Champions League winners
[edit]Hi I feel that you have made unnecessary use of templates on the above titled page. It is a definitive page and the content you have separated to templates should remain on the page itself as there is no use for the templates elsewhere. Therefore the templates should be copied back over to the main page and then deleted. Please respond whether you agree or disagree.
Thanks You. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Justme54s (talk • contribs) 15:36, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
Template:User non nobis sed omnibus has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Bulwersator (talk) 08:12, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
MfD nomination of Template:User non nobis sed omnibus
[edit]Template:User non nobis sed omnibus, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Template:User non nobis sed omnibus and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Template:User non nobis sed omnibus during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Bulwersator (talk) 08:14, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
Template:UEFA Champions League Performance by clubs has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Mentoz86 (talk) 10:58, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
SUL
[edit]- Username: Uncle Scrooge (lancer l'usurpation)
- Confirmation of claim on home wiki: User talk:Uncle Scrooge#SUL
- Requête du : 5 septembre 2013 à 21:46 (CEST)
- OK, thank you. The username Uncle Scrooge is now available for usurpation on frwiki. Litlok (talk) 15:04, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:LausanneHClogo.png
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:LausanneHClogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:21, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:40, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, Uncle Scrooge. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:LausanneHClogo.png
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:LausanneHClogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:11, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Nationalliga Team
[edit]
Template:Nationalliga Team has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 00:27, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Uncle Scrooge. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:ATP Race Points Distribution
[edit]Template:ATP Race Points Distribution has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. SFB 18:59, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:ATP Entry Ranking Points Distribution 2008
[edit]Template:ATP Entry Ranking Points Distribution 2008 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Nigej (talk) 19:56, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
February 2022
[edit]
A page you created has been nominated for deletion because it is a biography of a living person that is entirely negative in tone and has unsourced content, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
Do not create articles about living people that are entirely negative in tone and unsourced. Wikipedia has a policy of verifiability and any negative information we use must be reliably sourced, and our articles must be balanced. Negative, unreferenced biographies of living people, along with attack pages, are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or repost such pages and images in violation of our biographies of living persons policy may be blocked from editing. Chess (talk) (please use {{reply to|Chess}} on reply) 22:53, 4 February 2022 (UTC)