User talk:Voyagerstype

This is Voyagerstype's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hamley Bridge railway station (July 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hamley Bridge railway station and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 16:11, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Voyagerstype! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 16:11, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hamley Bridge railway station (July 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hamley Bridge railway station and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 15:47, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Burra railway station has been accepted

Burra railway station, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 08:35, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

July 2024

Your edit to Burra railway station has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Broc (talk) 09:33, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hamley Bridge railway station (July 27)

I left some comments on the draft. When you find an article in Trove, please include the name of the newspaper in your reference. Please add coordinates to the infobox. Please indicate the name of the regional council or local authority where where the station is located. To see the best way to create a reference to a newspaper article, please see Template:Cite_news Eastmain (talk • contribs) 05:18, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August 2024

Your edit to Bowmans railway station has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Broc (talk) 14:03, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; however, please remember the essential rule of respecting copyrights. Edits to Wikipedia, such as your edit to the page Goolwa railway station, may not contain material from copyrighted sources unless that text is available under a suitable free license. It is almost never okay to copy extensive text out of a book or website and paste it into a Wikipedia article with little or no alteration, though you can clearly and briefly quote copyrighted text in the right circumstances. Content that does not comply with this legal rule must be removed. For more information on this, see:

If you still have questions, there is the Teahouse, or you can click here to ask a question on your talk page and someone will be along to answer it shortly. As you get started, you may find the pages below to be helpful.

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Wikishovel (talk) 11:41, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

please make an effort

Please have a look at:-

https://trove.nla.gov.au/search/category/newspapers?keyword=goolwa%20railway%20station

https://trove.nla.gov.au/search/category/newspapers?keyword=semaphore%20railway%20station

JarrahTree 13:18, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I have seen no engagement with other editors (I may well have missed something), when you have had so many tags for a range of issues, it really helps to see if you can acknowledge the points, and understand what is going on. Thanks for your edits on railway stations. JarrahTree 10:35, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It has now got to the point where editors are seeing you as a point of contact for draftifying new articles - which questions the notability or verifiability of a particular railway station - it appears that no one has offered you links to the state of the policies and practices in wikipedia in relation to railway stations and notability. You are now at a point where talk page silence, and lack of effort in clarifying railway stations as notable may well be at your disadvantage. JarrahTree 00:54, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Grand Junction Road railway station, Adelaide moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Grand Junction Road railway station, Adelaide. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Waqar💬 08:52, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Plympton railway station, Adelaide moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Plympton railway station, Adelaide. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 12:05, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Eastern Parade railway station

The article Eastern Parade railway station has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of any notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 10:06, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Eastern Parade railway station for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Eastern Parade railway station is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eastern Parade railway station until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Fram (talk) 13:51, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

MOS:REFSPACE

Per MOS:REFSPACE, please do not put any spaces between words or punctuation and the following citation(s) and/or tags. Fork99 (talk) 08:02, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And no spaces between citations either. Fork99 (talk) 08:03, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Plush's Corner railway station

The article Plush's Corner railway station has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable "stopping place" on South Australian railway line that closed in 1956. Surely does not meet, and is incapable of meeting, WP:N.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cabrils (talk) 06:46, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Plush's Corner railway station

Hello Voyagerstype, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Plush's Corner railway station, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Plush's Corner railway station.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Cabrils}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Cabrils (talk) 08:39, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Actil railway station for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Actil railway station is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Actil railway station until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Trainsandotherthings (talk) 15:44, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of closed railway stations in Adelaide moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to List of closed railway stations in Adelaide. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 16:08, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of closed railway stations in Adelaide (September 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Utopes was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The first paragraph should not have 16 references, and then having no inline citations throughout the rest of the article. Please fix and distribute the citations throughout, depending on which material is attributed to each reference.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of closed railway stations in Adelaide and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 14:27, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that your recent edit to List of closed railway stations in South Australia did not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary (or the default undo summary), and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! Fork99 (talk) 20:39, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved content from List of closed railway stations in South Australia into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content (here or elsewhere), Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Fork99 (talk) 21:13, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Chowilla Dam railway line

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Chowilla Dam railway line requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://outdoorstype.com.au/chowilla-dam-railway-line-the-line-that-was-never-used/#:~:text=There%20was%20once%20a%20short,Dam%20project%20in%20South%20Australia.. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Fram (talk) 08:24, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Mount Gambier Rail Trail

Hello Voyagerstype, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Mount Gambier Rail Trail, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mount Gambier Rail Trail.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Wolverine XI}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Wolverine XI ^{(talk to me)} 10:34, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Shamus Liptrot Cycling Trail

Hello Voyagerstype, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Shamus Liptrot Cycling Trail, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shamus Liptrot Cycling Trail.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Wolverine XI}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Wolverine XI ^{(talk to me)} 10:36, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mount Barker Rail Trail moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Mount Barker Rail Trail. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. — Moriwen (talk) 23:11, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of closed railway stations in Adelaide has been accepted

List of closed railway stations in Adelaide, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

– Joe (talk) 12:49, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Woodville North railway station

Hello Voyagerstype, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Woodville North railway station, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Woodville North railway station.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Pygos}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Pygos (talk) 09:23, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of closed railway stations in Adelaide, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Elizabeth railway station. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rabila railway station for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rabila railway station is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rabila railway station until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Trainsandotherthings (talk) 14:12, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your editing

The constant stream of poor quality edits and outright copyright violations has gone on for too long with zero acknowledgment from you. Either you start using your talk page, or you will be taking a trip to WP:ANI. Your choice. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 14:19, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Noting here that I just removed another copyright violation from Morgan railway station. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 18:42, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Lochiel railway line

Template:Lochiel railway line has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 06:45, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 15:16, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain namespaces ((Article) and Draft) for copyright problems and failure to communicate with others.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. asilvering (talk) 16:50, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Voyagerstype (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I will add explainations when adding new information on a Wikipedia article and will have reliable sources Voyagerstype (talk) 03:20, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Per lack of reply to asilvering. Please feel free to submit a new unblock request once you have addressed their concerns. Elli (talk | contribs) 15:14, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Request unblock Voyagerstype (talk) 03:20, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, that's... a start. Please do both of those things at all times. But that doesn't really address the reasons for your block. Can you explain why you have been blocked, and what you would do differently in the future to avoid the same problems? -- asilvering (talk) 06:52, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Moorlands railway station for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Moorlands railway station is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moorlands railway station until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Trainsandotherthings (talk) 00:59, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Voyagerstype (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I will not violate copyright violations and I will communicate while creating or editing articles Voyagerstype (talk) 08:49, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Duplicate request. Please respond to asilvering above. Elli (talk | contribs) 16:16, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock request Voyagerstype (talk) 08:49, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Rabila railway station

Hello, Voyagerstype

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username TarnishedPath and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've asked for a discussion about the redirect Rabila railway station, created by you. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 October 8 § Rabila railway station.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|TarnishedPath}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

TarnishedPath^talk 10:57, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Voyagerstype (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I would like to have myself unblocked on Wikipedia, as user asilvering mentioned, I failed to communicate with others and did copyright violations, however I am happy to improve and do none of that from now. Voyagerstype (talk) 07:13, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This does not convince me that you understand the specific reasons for your block, as discussed in Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/IncidentArchive1168#User:Voyagerstype_-_repeated_copyright_violations,_low_quality_contributions,_and_refusal_to_communicate. In particular you do not describe what specifically you did that was wrong, why it was wrong, and what edits you intend to make if unblocked. Sandstein 18:43, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Voyagerstype (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I would like to have myself unblocked on Wikipedia, as user asilvering mentioned, I failed to communicate with others and did copyright violations, however I am happy to improve and do none of that from now. Voyagerstype (talk) 07:58, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

One open unblock request at a time please. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 09:51, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Voyagerstype (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello, I am user VoyagersType and I have been blocked from editing on Wikipedia by user asilvering because I violated Copyright Violations and I failed to communicate with others. I am happy to improve and follow all the rules. I will also mention others while making certain edits and will not violate any violations so I request please unblock me from Wikipedia.Voyagerstype (talk) 07:31, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Above, I specified that you may have only one onblock request open at once. Please respect that. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 15:50, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.